- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This is a Quarterback driven league. Why do some do not understand the RW3 situation?
Posted on 3/4/21 at 5:46 pm
Posted on 3/4/21 at 5:46 pm
Just look at Tampa Bay for example with Brady. The QB is the most important player on the field and to make it all the way you have to go all in to get Wilson. Russell throws the deep ball better than anyone and is a future Hall of famer.
Lots of fans on here and mostly Facebook just don't understand it takes 3 first round picks and atleast two starters to make the trade. Look what it took for the Rams and Detroit trade.
This is all I got Hoss
Lots of fans on here and mostly Facebook just don't understand it takes 3 first round picks and atleast two starters to make the trade. Look what it took for the Rams and Detroit trade.
This is all I got Hoss
10
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:02 pm to BayouRat15
I would offer them Taysom, Lattimore, 2 first and a 3rd.
Get it done.
Get it done.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:04 pm to TeamCKennedy
That's a fair offer, but I don't think they want taysom. We might have to trade with someone that has a high draft pick and then trade that to seattle. Have to give them the ability to get a qb they can sell.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:12 pm to Pendulum
Give them Peat and be done!
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:13 pm to BayouRat15
quote:
The QB is the most important player on the field
How often does a QB with a top 5 salary even play in the SB though? There’s probably a reason it rarely (I think Manning in 2006 was the last to win it) happens.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:35 pm to BayouRat15
It would make me want to vomit but I honestly think I'd do 3 firsts for RW if that's what it took.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:42 pm to BayouRat15
Tampa didn’t have to give up anything to get Brady. Sort of a big difference.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:47 pm to BayouRat15
See the issue right now is that we have had good picks (Mccoy, cgj, trautman) in the past few years. But we haven't had anything as amazing as that 2017 class.
We're right at the edge where young talent aren't cost controlled anymore and with the cap falling there is gonna be a talent dip. How bad idk until the cuts finish.
That being said: can our team afford to give up 6 starters/potential starter picks? 4 of which would be rookie talent? I just don't know...
If we won 2 years ago and Brees retired it's a no brainer. Right now, I'm not sure we're in the ideal situation
We're right at the edge where young talent aren't cost controlled anymore and with the cap falling there is gonna be a talent dip. How bad idk until the cuts finish.
That being said: can our team afford to give up 6 starters/potential starter picks? 4 of which would be rookie talent? I just don't know...
If we won 2 years ago and Brees retired it's a no brainer. Right now, I'm not sure we're in the ideal situation
Posted on 3/4/21 at 8:24 pm to BayouRat15
You do whatever it takes to get a HOF QB
Posted on 3/4/21 at 8:31 pm to htran90
Wilson will make up for a lot of that.
He doesn't have to have a top 5 line.
You can make up for it elsewhere.
He doesn't have to have a top 5 line.
You can make up for it elsewhere.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 8:40 pm to BayouRat15
quote:
Just look at Tampa Bay for example with Brady. The QB is the most important player on the field and to make it all the way you have to go all in to get Wilson. Russell throws the deep ball better than anyone and is a future Hall of famer.
Lots of fans on here and mostly Facebook just don't understand it takes 3 first round picks and atleast two starters to make the trade. Look what it took for the Rams and Detroit trade.
This is all I got Hoss
There is two schools of thought here. If we go all out now and get Wilson it puts us in good position to win a super bowl if we can keep the team relatively intact. On the other hand, Russel Wilson turns 33 this year. Is it worth giving of a bunch of picks and assets for someone that might only be in the league another 5 years or so give or take. Like I would be all in on getting a 25 year old Deshaun Watson but that is a lot to give up for a 33 year old player. I don’t hate it and I think it puts us back in super bowl position but we don’t know how long Wilson will play for and how long before he starts to digress
Posted on 3/4/21 at 9:01 pm to BayouRat15
I’ll give them taysom hill, Andrea peat, Michael Thomas, 3 firsts, two seconds and 10 million in cash considerations
Dude above me complaining about getting a 32 year old player. That’s an 8-10 year window to win Super Bowls. You do it everytime, what you smoking?
Dude above me complaining about getting a 32 year old player. That’s an 8-10 year window to win Super Bowls. You do it everytime, what you smoking?
This post was edited on 3/4/21 at 9:14 pm
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:43 pm to Chalkywhite84
If that were true he would have won it with Seattle!
Posted on 3/4/21 at 10:51 pm to bigberg2000
quote:
Tampa didn’t have to give up anything to get Brady. Sort of a big difference
The Tom Brady example was to show the audience that a top tier quarterback was needed to take Tampa over the top. For them to boost their roster to the Super Bowl.
It didn't say anything about a Tom Brady trade.
This post was edited on 3/4/21 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:00 pm to metryboy
quote:
If that were true he would have won it with Seattle!
Uhhh, should somebody tell him?
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:04 pm to metryboy
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:27 pm to jaTigerfan
I know this will be unpopular but would your trade Kamara and a 2nd for Wilson?
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:28 pm to jaTigerfan
Since 2000 (so last 20 SBs), there has been 3 instances in which the winning QB was ranked among top 5 highest paid QBs that year. So 17 instances where this wasn’t the case. In many cases, the winning QB wasn’t even top 10 or 15. Also 1 of those 3 instances was P. Manning in 2015 where his team won in spite of his play. So really 2 revenant cases (another was Eli in 2007 who had a bad regular season).
Yet you guys want to trade everything needed to get Wilson so he can be on a more depleted team. All to get a maybe a year or two before the team is further depleted because of this trade.
Yet you guys want to trade everything needed to get Wilson so he can be on a more depleted team. All to get a maybe a year or two before the team is further depleted because of this trade.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 11:57 pm to BayouRat15
quote:
The Tom Brady example was to show the audience that a top tier quarterback was needed to take Tampa over the top. For them to boost their roster to the Super Bowl.
It didn't say anything about a Tom Brady trade.
You cannot ignore that they didn’t give up anything significant to get him. 2020 Brady would’ve only been capable of so much elevation if the team was more depleted because of a monster trade.
Posted on 3/5/21 at 7:59 am to SaintNation
quote:
I know this will be unpopular but would your trade Kamara and a 2nd for Wilson?
Seattle hangs up the phone laughing hysterically.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News