- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:15 pm to Colonel Flagg
He will catch the ball out of the backfield as good as anyone....
Bigger, stronger, faster....
You draft a RB to be a RB....McCaffery might be a better WR, but you're drafting a RB not WR...
Bigger, stronger, faster....
You draft a RB to be a RB....McCaffery might be a better WR, but you're drafting a RB not WR...
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:15 pm to LSUlefty
Not a chance id take him.
I would field calls for the chance to pick him tho
I would field calls for the chance to pick him tho
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:17 pm to HollierThanThou
quote:
I would field calls for the chance to pick him tho
Teams would give their left arm for that chance at 11. We could clean house in the draft if this happened.
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:24 pm to LSUlefty
quote:
Word is that Carolina will take McCaffrey.
Carolina is dumb if they do that...but im hoping they do. Would hate to see an offense with both Cam and lf7 in the backfield Olsen at te and Benjamin being 100% this year. Do we really want this problem?
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:26 pm to LSUlefty
Fournette fits Carolina much more than Mccaffrey.
Opposite can be said for the Saints.
Hypothetically, if Fournette is there I think you have to take him
Opposite can be said for the Saints.
Hypothetically, if Fournette is there I think you have to take him
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:29 pm to LSUlefty
Absolutely do not take Fournette. Dude goes silent and gets shut down in big games by good defenses. Imagine how much he will bust in the nfl. The dude has bust written all over him and is not the ideal modern day running back. That would be Dalvin Cook or McCaffrey.
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:31 pm to FitzBlitz52
I still think Cincy drafts Foster. That's their type of player all over the place. I also can see Allen sliding until mid to late teens. I think Jacksonville will take Fournette, NYJ take Watson, Panthers get McCaffrey. At 9 goes Foster with Buffalo on the clock. We'll have our pick of the litter it's just if we take who everyone is predicting (Barnett) like Rankins last year. Personally I'd love Barnett. The guy was super productive even when teams schemed specifically to shut him down. Barnett and Cam as our ends, Rankins and Fairley as our D tackles.
At 32 (assuming we get Butler) I say another CB or LB.
At 32 (assuming we get Butler) I say another CB or LB.
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:32 pm to breauxmosexual
quote:
Absolutely do not take Fournette. Dude goes silent and gets shut down in big games by good defenses. Imagine how much he will bust in the nfl. The dude has bust written all over him and is not the ideal modern day running back. That would be Dalvin Cook or McCaffrey.
Oh lawd in heavenz
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:35 pm to breauxmosexual
quote:
Absolutely do not take Fournette. Dude goes silent and gets shut down in big games by good defenses. Imagine how much he will bust in the nfl. The dude has bust written all over him and is not the ideal modern day running back. That would be Dalvin Cook or McCaffrey.
I wish I had more down votes that I could give you
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:48 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
He will catch the ball out of the backfield as good as anyone.... Bigger, stronger, faster.... You draft a RB to be a RB....McCaffery might be a better WR, but you're drafting a RB not WR...
I'm with you, whats the point of drafting a running Back that is really a slot receiver? I didn't like it when Bush was here either. Not only does this take your best run threat off of the field, but screams to the defense that we're passing the ball (at least the way Payton and company have done things recently.) If McCaffery is the pick, I want to see Marshall Faulk/ Tomlison type usage. They both had to put on some mass to do it, but it turned out just fine through out their careers.
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:48 pm to itig19
90% of the dumbest shite on this board is typed by breauxmosexuals fat fingers!
Posted on 4/21/17 at 2:22 pm to Magazine St
quote:
'm with you, whats the point of drafting a running Back that is really a slot receiver? I didn't like it when Bush was here either. Not only does this take your best run threat off of the field, but screams to the defense that we're passing the ball (at least the way Payton and company have done things recently.) If McCaffery is the pick, I want to see Marshall Faulk/ Tomlison type usage. They both had to put on some mass to do it, but it turned out just fine through out their careers
Yeah, this is a terrible idea because our offense sucked so bad with Reggie and Sproles. Defense knew we were passing and they just shut us down!
Now to get serious, McCaffrey would be a slam dunk pick for us and would make our offense unstoppable. I would pick him ahead of Fournette for our offense.
Posted on 4/21/17 at 2:55 pm to OleSkuleTgr
You run to the God damn podium if Fournette is available, period. He's a once in a generation talent at RB and is literally a better value than anyone else available.
Fournette running behind our O-line will be a monster. Do you know what kinds of holes that would open up on the outside? Did you see what Michael Thomas did against triple teams last year? Imagine getting single coverage all game long.
Fournette running behind our O-line will be a monster. Do you know what kinds of holes that would open up on the outside? Did you see what Michael Thomas did against triple teams last year? Imagine getting single coverage all game long.
Posted on 4/21/17 at 3:04 pm to blackandgolddude
Can Fournette stop opposing offenses from scoring 21+ a game?
Posted on 4/21/17 at 3:07 pm to JS87
Can he average 4 yards a carry and stop our stupid amount of 3 and outs, as well as dumb turnovers from throwing all game long?
The D isn't all that's wrong with this team. Our offense has issues staying on the field, too. He goes a long way to addressing that issue, as well.
The D isn't all that's wrong with this team. Our offense has issues staying on the field, too. He goes a long way to addressing that issue, as well.
Posted on 4/21/17 at 3:13 pm to breauxmosexual
Hey B$.....,Fournette ran against 11 guys in the box on almost every play of his career because of Ex-Coach Miles play calling. When everybody on earth knows the call and you still get 1700 yards plus in a season in the SEC. Well you can see his talent. Zeke flew into BR last year to watch LF7 and said he was the MAN.
You understand in the NFL in space LF7 will be a superstar.....but it is just a wait and see. Not saying the Saints will or should take him. But you Cannot say that LF7 is crap.
You understand in the NFL in space LF7 will be a superstar.....but it is just a wait and see. Not saying the Saints will or should take him. But you Cannot say that LF7 is crap.
This post was edited on 4/21/17 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 4/21/17 at 3:28 pm to LSUlefty
I do not want a RB in the first round, but I think you have to take Fournette if he somehow slides to 11. I seriously doubt we have this problem but I feel you have to pull the bite bullet, take him, and go defense after that.
Posted on 4/21/17 at 4:53 pm to blackandgolddude
Send me a picture of Michael Thomas getting triple teamed
Posted on 4/21/17 at 5:13 pm to LSUlefty
You never pass on a talent like Fournette for need.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News