- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff: Why does Aaron Brooks get so much hate?
Posted on 3/22/14 at 11:10 pm to Sho Nuff
Posted on 3/22/14 at 11:10 pm to Sho Nuff
as well as Brooks played in 2000 and helped win the 1st playoff game, I hated it for Jeff Blake.
he seemed like he was starting to hit his stride but then I think Lance Johnston of the Raiders rolled up on his foot on that old crap arse astro turf.
he seemed like he was starting to hit his stride but then I think Lance Johnston of the Raiders rolled up on his foot on that old crap arse astro turf.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 11:20 pm to Lester Earl
Saying Aaron Brooks was a below average QB is talking out of my arse?? Guess a lot of people talk out of their arse then. You realize you also talk in a matter of fact way as well?
No doubt that he threw for a lot of yards and TDs. But what about other things such as his completion %, INTs, fumbles, and record as a starter? Compare that with other QBs and see where he stacks up.
38 - 44 as a starter. Best season completion % wise was 59.1%. Career completion % was 56.3%. Was 26th in completion percentage in 2001, 27th in 2002, 15th in 2003, 24th in 2004, and 28th in 2005. Average ranking in completion percentage over 5 seasons with the Saints was 24th in the league. Below average.
Threw 120 TDs, but also had 84 INTs and 59 fumbles. 4.3% of his plays went for TDs. 3.0% of his plays went for INTs. Thats horrible. Also had a bunch of sacks over that time period. Not all his fault, but partially is his fault.
His career passer rating as a Saint was 79.7. Was only ranked in the top 16 in passer rating 1 year out of the 5 he played for the Saints, 2003. Was 21st in 2001, 23rd in 2002, 9th in 2003 19th in 2004, and 37th in 2005. His average ranking was 22nd, below average.
Its not like Im saying hes the worst QB ever, just below average. He had some moments where he looked like he could be great, like the 2003 season. But they were too few and far between his horrible moments.
No doubt that he threw for a lot of yards and TDs. But what about other things such as his completion %, INTs, fumbles, and record as a starter? Compare that with other QBs and see where he stacks up.
38 - 44 as a starter. Best season completion % wise was 59.1%. Career completion % was 56.3%. Was 26th in completion percentage in 2001, 27th in 2002, 15th in 2003, 24th in 2004, and 28th in 2005. Average ranking in completion percentage over 5 seasons with the Saints was 24th in the league. Below average.
Threw 120 TDs, but also had 84 INTs and 59 fumbles. 4.3% of his plays went for TDs. 3.0% of his plays went for INTs. Thats horrible. Also had a bunch of sacks over that time period. Not all his fault, but partially is his fault.
His career passer rating as a Saint was 79.7. Was only ranked in the top 16 in passer rating 1 year out of the 5 he played for the Saints, 2003. Was 21st in 2001, 23rd in 2002, 9th in 2003 19th in 2004, and 37th in 2005. His average ranking was 22nd, below average.
Its not like Im saying hes the worst QB ever, just below average. He had some moments where he looked like he could be great, like the 2003 season. But they were too few and far between his horrible moments.
This post was edited on 3/22/14 at 11:36 pm
Posted on 3/22/14 at 11:24 pm to KG5989
quote:
Its not like Im saying hes the worst QB ever, just below average. He had some moments where he looked like he could be great. But they were too few and far between his horrible moments.
Agreed.
Throughout the bad times, Haslett was dead set handcuffed to Brooks for some reason ala Les Miles to Jordan Jefferson. There was no chance Jake Delhomme was ever gonna see the field barring a Brooks season ending injury.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 11:29 pm to KG5989
quote:
Saying Aaron Brooks was a below average QB is talking out of my arse?? Guess a lot of people talk out of their arse then.
Uhhh yeah
Posted on 3/22/14 at 11:31 pm to KG5989
quote:
59 fumbles.
well shite. never realized he had so many. that would be something else if all of those were lost fumbles to the other team.
ronde barber used to be a real pain in the arse when ever he played Brooks. I don't know if he was just that familiar with his routines b/c they played college ball together or what but that guy use to fricking kill us.
Brooks did have the Rams number though seemed like. One of my favorite games of the Haslett era was the comeback win up there in STL in 2001.
the Saints got a bunch of turnovers on defense but Brooks threw a few nice TDs as well.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 11:49 pm to KG5989
quote:
Saying Aaron Brooks was a below average QB is talking out of my arse?? Guess a lot of people talk out of their arse then.
Gueess so.
You do not know what below average is. You should use your awesome google skills and see all the good QBs with similar career completion % and QB rating as Brooks, if that's what you want to crutch your argument on.
Fumbles? Record as a starter? Sacks?

Throwing 36 more TDs than INTs is also considered below average now

Posted on 3/23/14 at 1:05 am to oVo
quote:
Dude gave us our first playoff away game win.
Actually he didn't. That honor goes to Mr. Brees.
Posted on 3/23/14 at 2:37 am to GynoSandberg
2001 - 55.9%, 27 total TDs, 24 total turnovers.
2002- 53.6%, 29 total TDs, 20 total turnovers.
2003 - 59.1%, 26 total TDs, 19 total turnovers ( his best passing year by far, only 8 INTs but had 11 fumbles lost)
2004 - 57%, 25 total TDs, 18 total turnovers.
2005 - 55.7%, 15 total TDs, 19 total turnovers.
So 122 total TDs to 100 total turnovers as a fulltime starter. 1.2 : 1 TD:Turnover ratio. Yea I would say thats below average. Curious to know who everyone thinks is an average NFL QB. If relatively healthy, most "average" NFL QBs can stay in the league longer than Brooks did as well.
Some of the guys with similar completion % and QB rating were great QBs. They played in a completely diff era in a completely diff game. Look at the average QB rating by decade. In the 60s it was 69.4, 80s it was 74.4, and so on. The average got better as the game grew into a passing game. The QBs that are ranked near Brooks and played in the same timeframe as him are Kyle Orton, Chris Chander, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Jim Harbaugh, Mark Rypien, Elvis Grbac, Jon Kitna, Charlie Batch.
And once again, its not like Im saying Brooks was horrible or anything like that. In 2003, his best season by far, he was a solid and consistent NFL QB. 2001, 2002, 2004 he was a little below avearge. 2005 he was flat out horrible. 1 solid year out of 5 as a starter.
2002- 53.6%, 29 total TDs, 20 total turnovers.
2003 - 59.1%, 26 total TDs, 19 total turnovers ( his best passing year by far, only 8 INTs but had 11 fumbles lost)
2004 - 57%, 25 total TDs, 18 total turnovers.
2005 - 55.7%, 15 total TDs, 19 total turnovers.
So 122 total TDs to 100 total turnovers as a fulltime starter. 1.2 : 1 TD:Turnover ratio. Yea I would say thats below average. Curious to know who everyone thinks is an average NFL QB. If relatively healthy, most "average" NFL QBs can stay in the league longer than Brooks did as well.
Some of the guys with similar completion % and QB rating were great QBs. They played in a completely diff era in a completely diff game. Look at the average QB rating by decade. In the 60s it was 69.4, 80s it was 74.4, and so on. The average got better as the game grew into a passing game. The QBs that are ranked near Brooks and played in the same timeframe as him are Kyle Orton, Chris Chander, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Jim Harbaugh, Mark Rypien, Elvis Grbac, Jon Kitna, Charlie Batch.
And once again, its not like Im saying Brooks was horrible or anything like that. In 2003, his best season by far, he was a solid and consistent NFL QB. 2001, 2002, 2004 he was a little below avearge. 2005 he was flat out horrible. 1 solid year out of 5 as a starter.
Posted on 3/23/14 at 2:55 am to oVo
I love that AB gets hate for smiling. Dude was just a chill guy. The same people that get mad at AB for smiling, hate Jordan Jefferson because of all the stank faces he made.
Posted on 3/23/14 at 3:28 am to KG5989
quote:
Curious to know who everyone thinks is an average NFL QB. If relatively healthy, most "average" NFL QBs can stay in the league longer than Brooks did as well.
Tom Brady for instance, threw 124 TD passes in the same time period.
Guess how many QBs threw for more yards than Brooks from when he became a starter thru 2004. just guess,,,,
I'll help you. Payton Manning, Brett Favre, and Daunte Culpepper.
No mention of Brooks being 2nd in NFL in comeback victories during this time either to Tom Brady either.
quote:
So 122 total TDs to 100 total turnovers as a fulltime starter.
you're doing a swell job of skewing stats here. Lol, pinning all fumbles lost on him, so 120 TDs to 100 total turnovers. My god, can you reach any more. Using any stats from the Katrina season is also a joke.
And no mention of his 13 rushing TDs as a Saint. Ironic.
quote:
Curious to know who everyone thinks is an average NFL QB
as opposed to someone thinking a guy that can finish 2nd, 5th, and 7th in the WHOLE NFL in TD passes can be a below average QB.
quote:
. The QBs that are ranked near Brooks and played in the same timeframe as him are Kyle Orton, Chris Chander, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Jim Harbaugh, Mark Rypien, Elvis Grbac, Jon Kitna, Charlie Batch.
TD passes
Brooks: 123 (93 games, 7 seasons)
Kitna 169 (141 games, 16 seasons)
Grbac 99 TDs (105 games, 8 seasons)
Rypien 115 TDs (104 games, 11 seasons)
Orton 83 TDs (75 games, 9 seasons)
Fitz 105 TDs (86 games, 9 seasons)
Harabaugh 129TDs (177 games, 14 seasons)
Batch 61 TDs (81 games, 12 seasons)
Im not sure what I am missing here. Brooks basically started 5.5 seasons, and has accomplished more than any of these guys who have played much longer.
So you are saying their QB ratings are the same?
is that like saying Phillip Rivers and Tony Romo are the same as Peyton Manning because they have the same passer rating? Or Rich Gannon is = to Brett Favre? How does that work?
Posted on 3/23/14 at 7:04 am to Lester Earl
"We had a chance to go to the playoffs, and I got hard-headed because Aaron Brooks got hurt, " Haslett said to Rams beat reporter Jim Thomas in an interview with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch this week. "I should've put the backup in and didn't. Everybody wanted the backup in, and I didn't. In hindsight, I probably should have, because the backup turned out to be a pretty darn good quarterback, Jake Delhomme."
This is why Jim Haslett should never be a head coacb in the NFL again. His ego overrides the team.
This is why Jim Haslett should never be a head coacb in the NFL again. His ego overrides the team.
This post was edited on 3/23/14 at 7:06 am
Posted on 3/23/14 at 8:06 am to Breesus
quote:Mike McCarthy gets no blame?
Haslett is more to blame than brooks for his issues.
Posted on 3/23/14 at 8:27 am to oVo
quote:
Why does Aaron Brooks get so much hate?
I never got to the point of hating him and as a matter of fact was really excited with his potential for his 1st couple of years. But towards the end of his career in NO, I did get sick of the grinning like a possum after yet another one of his high-lite reel blooper plays.
But the biggest reason I was ready to see him go by the end was it was obvious by that time he had become really gun shy in the pocket. I think my main memories of him now are his famous taking the snap and immediately starting to fade backwards...and backwards....and backwards.
This post was edited on 3/23/14 at 8:35 am
Posted on 3/23/14 at 8:31 am to Hoodoo Man
quote:
But that doesn't mean they hate him because he's black.
That's why I said it was a factor. "that's why you need a white qb" "black qbs don't have it upstairs" etc aren't the same thing as your made up hypothetical. My evidence was anecdotal, but it seemed to happen in multiple sections during the last couple of years/year they delhomme.
The delhomme love was also incredible. He was an average at best qb in Carolina if you go back and actually look at the stats. Us not being married to him was such a huge blessing for this franchise.
This post was edited on 3/23/14 at 8:42 am
Posted on 3/23/14 at 8:37 am to Hoodoo Man
quote:
Let's not forget that he played injured in front of Delhomme, a player that was obviously the better choice.
That choice was obvious only during Brooks ' injury period. I blame Haslett more than anything.
Posted on 3/23/14 at 9:25 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
Why does jamarcus get so much hate from LSU fans despite being the best qb in school history?
He doesnt
Posted on 3/23/14 at 9:32 am to Choctaw
AB's grin after throwing picks erked me to the max. I was glad when he left.
Posted on 3/23/14 at 9:50 am to Cincinnati Bowtie
quote:
Mike McCarthy gets no blame?
why in Gods name would McCarthy get the blame? the man made Brooks a decent QB. McCarthys track record speaks for itself.
theres so much wrong in this thread it amazes me. Lester was actually on a decent track until he compared Drews attitude towards mistakes to Brooks'. Brooks wasnt awful. but his attitude sucked and thats what stuck out more than anything. this thread really shines a light on the rantards in disguise here.
Posted on 3/23/14 at 9:59 am to BlacknGold
quote:
Why does Aaron Brooks get so much hate?
He once called a timeout while at UV because they did not have enough players on the field. He forgot to count himself, that's why.
Oh and the freaking smirk on his face every freaking time he threw a INT.
Posted on 3/23/14 at 10:02 am to Lester Earl
quote:after throwing an INT, while running of the field? bullshite
Ive seen brees smile after a bad play before
Back to top
