Started By
Message

re: SFP's RB argument

Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:47 pm to
Posted by slapahoe
USA
Member since Sep 2009
7475 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Oh geez. Please stop posting this shite. The draft isn't even over and you declaring this a mistake.


Link me to where is said it was a mistake? TIA
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61866 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

who did leshour play for and against?


Same school PT did.
Posted by F machine
Member since Jun 2009
11886 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:47 pm to
Nope. They haven't. Now odds are he won't be emmitt, but he can still be really good and better than any rb in this draft. We will see.
Posted by jacks40
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
11877 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

And Saints FO probably knows more than jacks40 and SFP.


I'm sure they do.

Doesn't make them perfect though right? You think every move ever made has been correct?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

same league PT played in, you hold that against him too?


No. I really didn't know what league leshoure played in.

Posted by F machine
Member since Jun 2009
11886 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:49 pm to
I'm sure I can show you plenty of college qbs with better stats than brees, manning, and Brady. It doesn't mean they are better pros though.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61866 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

And Saints FO probably knows more than jacks40 and SFP.


Minnesota FO probably knows more too, but they still fricked up their draft.
Posted by jacks40
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
11877 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

but he can still be really good and better than any rb in this draft. We will see.


I agree he has a chance to be the best RB in this draft.

Just don't know how MUCH better

If Ingram, Williams, and Thomas all hit their peak I don't see much difference
This post was edited on 4/29/11 at 7:51 pm
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37667 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

See I can do that too...


No you can't. Ingram could have had a 2000 yard rushing season at Illinois. The majority of Ingram's yards came after contact. So your offensive line argument is null and void.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61866 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:51 pm to
BTW, I wanted Ingram at 24. Don't get it twisted, I love the guy. Just admitting SFP seems to be right and I was wrong after everything played out.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61750 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Hindsight is 20/20 but it seems SFP was right.



You didnt understand SFPs argument. Plus he specifically said he would not draft a RB in the 2nd round. Finally, are you on record saying LeShoure in the 2nd would have been better than Ingram in the first via the trade?
Posted by bubbz
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
23084 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:52 pm to
Don't listen to SFP, he thinks Jenkins was a miss...
Posted by TexasTiger6777
Surrounded by Longhorns and Aggies
Member since Jan 2008
3079 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:52 pm to
No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that your opinion is correct either.

Who do we get with our 2 3s internet guru?
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
21907 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:52 pm to
Your a fricking dillweed just like SFP. why did the entire professional football world have Ingram rated as a first round pick and not the other backs if they are all one in the same. Eat a dick and get over yourself.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:52 pm to
He had zero fumbles on 423 attempts, wow.
Posted by jacks40
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
11877 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Finally, are you on record saying LeShoure in the 2nd would have been better than Ingram in the first via the trade


you mean including the 1st we have to give up next year too?
Posted by Mahootney
Lovin' My German Footprint
Member since Sep 2008
12121 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:53 pm to
You are all retarded.
Sec competition is the best. The guy had some of the best measureables for rb's in the class, and was the only consensus 1st rounder.
Sp and the saints took a historically losing franchise and won a superbowl on talent evaluation.
Gfy. And then consider that the saints addressed 2..... 2 needs with top 15 talent. For the price of the differential between the second round and third round picks. These guys nailed it. If you can't see that. Or at least acknowledge it. You deserve to jeep the bags on your heads.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61866 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

Finally, are you on record saying LeShoure in the 2nd would have been better than Ingram in the first via the trade?


LeShoure + 1st round pick in 2012 over Ingram, yeah. Not sure how LeShoure will do in 2011 though because Detroit's line is atrocious.
Posted by oreeg
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
5404 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Hindsight is 20/20


The pick happened less than 24 hours ago and you're talking about hindsight? Why don't we let at least one season go by before you start raiding Loomis' house with torches and pitchforks?
Posted by F machine
Member since Jun 2009
11886 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:55 pm to
But how do you know he was right? Just because they have similar stats and have a similar build doesn't mean they will have similar careers.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram