- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints trade Cooks & 4th round pick to Pats for 32 pick plus 3rd round pick
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:03 pm to goatmilker
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:03 pm to goatmilker
Seems to me, he doesn't want to be here. Get something for him now. Next year, he will walk out the door.
2
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:03 pm to shel311
And for those saying that Cooks was fricking up the locker room:
quote:
Zach Strief?Verified account @ZachStrief Follow More Zach Strief Retweeted deuce mcallister 100% correct Deuce. Fantastic teammate with a tremendous attitude and work ethic. Nothing but praise for @brandincooks
quote:
deuce mcallister?Verified account @dmcallister26 Follow More deuce mcallister Retweeted Bubba He was not a locker room problem
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:03 pm to Load Toad
quote:
Next year, he will walk out the door.
He wouldn't have the choice
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:04 pm to Load Toad
quote:
Next year, he will walk out the door.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:04 pm to josh336
This team is giving the browns a run for being the worst run franchise in the league
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:06 pm to THRILLHO
guess we should've been rooting for the Falcons after all
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:06 pm to Load Toad
quote:
Saints lost to Panthers at end of game when Cooks fail to come down with catch in the end zone.
You mean when Cooks beat Norman for what should have been a TD and the ball was underthrown?
He wasn't "outmuscled" for it
Member the Denver game?
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:06 pm to THRILLHO
I think the whole "he got traded because he mouthed off" deal is overblown. I think it's mainly just the fact that we clearly got a lot of interest in him, we still have Drew Brees, and we need defensive help more than a mainly one dimensional WR.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:06 pm to THRILLHO
If no strife inside the team then whats left? The coaches believe so much in our young WR's and Brees that they valued adding to the defense more than Cooks established value?
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:07 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
That's my favorite worst hot take yet
We lost five games by a td or less last year. We need to improve defense.
We lost five games by a td or less last year. We need to improve defense.
This post was edited on 3/10/17 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:09 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
It was likely the best offer still on the table
Likely?
That's pretty much a guarantee. This just shows you how desperate they were to get rid of him. On paper, this makes no sense.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:10 pm to whatiknowsofar
We drafted a 5'10 receiver in the first round in a year where we needed defense, and traded him 3 years later.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:10 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
We drafted a 5'10 receiver in the first round in a year where we needed defense, and traded him 3 years later.
We had a top 5 defense when we drafted him, and the belief was we needed a WR
We also added Byrd that year and extended Junior and Cam
This post was edited on 3/10/17 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:11 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
We lost five games by a td or less last year. We need to improve defense.
The funny part is they will take an offensive player in the first three picks. You know it's true
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:11 pm to goatmilker
quote:
If no strife inside the team then whats left? The coaches believe so much in our young WR's and Brees that they valued adding to the defense more than Cooks established value?
Apparently.
It was like the bullshite rhetoric of why we traded Jimmy, when he wasn't a locker room problem. We just thought we could get better pieces elsewhere to help the team more.
Though with this trade I don't see that value. We needed a proven player not a draft pick.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:12 pm to cssamerican
As long as it's Fournette so I can watch this board melt.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:12 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
We had a top 5 defense when we drafted him, and the belief was we needed a WR
So they believed we had a good defense, and we had one of the worst in history. Seem like good talent evaluation to you?
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:12 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
also added Byrd that year
This is not helping your argument
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:13 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:Everyone in their right mind thought Byrd was going to be awesome for us.
We also added Byrd that year
This post was edited on 3/10/17 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:14 pm to whatiknowsofar
it would have to work pretty hard to beat the melt we are currently observing
Page 10 of 13
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News