Started By
Message

re: Saints "not planning reset", will be more active in FA than last year

Posted on 2/27/25 at 7:51 am to
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
31305 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Not trying to be the dick but it’s clear that’s not what Kellen Moore wants. So…


Or mickey sat down and explained to him how hard it would be to get under the cap.

Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59377 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Tanking and resetting cap a little quicker guarantees nothing no matter how much you want to type words like it does.



It guarantees cap space and the OPPORTUNITY to be successful if you make quality moves. The Saints are operating with a significant handicap. And, it has put itself into a position where the removal of the handicap is at least a 2 year effort.

If the process doesn't start this year, then that 2 year effort is pushed down the road another year...and likely moves to a 3 year effort.

I think a lot of Saints fans simply aren't forward thinking. They don't understand.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
123895 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:08 am to
quote:

It guarantees cap space and the OPPORTUNITY to be successful if you make quality moves. The Saints are operating with a significant handicap. And, it has put itself into a position where the removal of the handicap is at least a 2 year effort.



I'm really not sure how anyone couldn't see this.

quote:

If the process doesn't start this year, then that 2 year effort is pushed down the road another year...and likely moves to a 3 year effort.



Well I have news for you. Loomis has no intention of changing his ways, he has made that very clear.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
172183 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:11 am to
quote:


It guarantees cap space and the OPPORTUNITY to be successful if you make quality moves. The Saints are operating with a significant handicap. And, it has put itself into a position where the removal of the handicap is at least a 2 year effort.

If the process doesn't start this year, then that 2 year effort is pushed down the road another year...and likely moves to a 3 year effort.

I think a lot of Saints fans simply aren't forward thinking. They don't understand.


it always guarantees you nothing.

what we do want to guarantee is a coach that is upper echeleon and can create a winning culture inside the organization sooner than later

playing the theory of, we want to hire a brilliant coach, we want to go 6-34 for 2 years, then we want to win a super bowl in 2 years is just a pie in the sky lets type good shite in a paragraph type responses. Moore is wanting to establish a winning culture vibe in new orleans. we have to string along a non idea cap situation for another year or two while we are getting by and rebuilding for the future.
This post was edited on 2/27/25 at 9:12 am
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59377 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:24 am to
quote:

it always guarantees you nothing.



it guarantees opportunity. Right now, our opportunity is limited significantly because of our cap situation.

quote:

what we do want to guarantee is a coach that is upper echeleon and can create a winning culture inside the organization sooner than later



To apply your retarded logic, that's isn't a guarantee. In fact, it's much more unlikely than likely. If you want to give Moore the best chance to succeed, you set up a multi year plan that gives him a chance of acquiring young quality talent with a year 3 cap situation that gives flexibility.

quote:

playing the theory of, we want to hire a brilliant coach, we want to go 6-34 for 2 years, then we want to win a super bowl in 2 years is just a pie in the sky lets type good shite


Year 3 is when it starts. We aren't winning in year 3. We start being able to compete then.

You don't understand the situation we are in. You just don't get it.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59377 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Well I have news for you. Loomis has no intention of changing his ways, he has made that very clear.



I understand and actually predicted it. People got very angry when I made the point that this coaching hire didn't matter because he would have almost zero chance of succeeding.

Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
70821 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:28 am to
It guarantees you have less money than other teams to resign your good draft pics and bid in the market for FAs when your 33nd in cap space out of 32 teams.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
123895 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:30 am to
quote:

I understand and actually predicted it. People got very angry when I made the point that this coaching hire didn't matter because he would have almost zero chance of succeeding.



I think that is a little far. We don't know what the future holds, and sometimes coaches transcend. I love what Moore is doing staff wise.

He will be fighting with one hand tied behind his back (at least), but I'm never going to say its not going to succeed because we don't know.

You never even know if Loomis will be here a year or two from now. I'm fairly confident he will be, but you just can't know.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
172183 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:31 am to
i fully get it.

i'm just taking a more reasonable approach to understanding that nfl teams just really don't go out there way to long term tank. Its not a guarantee of shite.

we have some cap restraints. i know. but, they still line up and play football. our biggest obstacles have been health and injuries over past 4 years DESPITE not having ideal coaching and DESPITE having an aging roster.

i am choosing not to be a complete miserable hyperbolic fricktard and allow a process that is being collaborated with kellen moore and an entire new coaching staff to play out.

i am trying to skew a lot of posters i enjoy a bit more to the positivity spectrum just slightly than where a lot of emotion is currently at.

i understand everything. despite my polarizing personality, i'm not some fricktard that isn't aware of what's going on etc or understand any sort of big picture.

tbh, i don't think we are able to hire kellen moore if kellen knew mickey had no real plans to put a winning product on the field over next couple years even with an 8 yr guaranteed contract. That's not what coaches want. Coaches want to build up and forward, not backwards and down.

This post was edited on 2/27/25 at 9:33 am
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
75686 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:31 am to
The cap will be in significantly better shape next season. Most haven’t been paying attention, but the saints have been cap conscious the last few years, certainly on the fringes.

David Onyematta has a $17mm cap hit for the falcons this year. Saunders and Shepherd are $10mm combined. Little moves like this add up.
This post was edited on 2/27/25 at 9:37 am
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
70821 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:44 am to
Would have liked to hear the not rated version between Loomis and Moore about the future of the cap, drafting and roster management. Now it's all coach GM speech lol.
Loomis went with a young buck not an experienced old bull. I see ya working Mick. Things will start to shake out as we are entering that phase we Saints call "extending contracts".
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
68894 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:49 am to
quote:

The cap will be in significantly better shape next season.


I hope so. In reality we won’t know until can kicking season is over. If we largely take our medicine then we should be in good shape. Focus on the draft and don’t give out any long term or large deals.

If we push more than we need to for the sake of short term winning then it won’t look as rosy as the future numbers have shown.

Just a waiting game at this point.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
75686 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 9:57 am to
We’ll have to eat into some of the 2026 cap, but that was the case whether we kept Carr or not.

quote:

If we push more than we need to for the sake of short term winning then it won’t look as rosy as the future numbers have shown.


Correct
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451312 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 10:01 am to
quote:

The cap will be in significantly better shape next season.


Reading the article

quote:

Instead, we’ll project that the Saints work out a pay cut with Jordan,




Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
68894 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 10:04 am to
Yeah I think that’s what a lot of us mean by “tanking” “gut” or “blow it up” and part of the big disconnect between fans right now.

Just stop with the pushing of shite into the future, you’re likely going to bottom out in the process but at least you’re moving towards the ability to have REAL flexibility again as an organization.

Bottoming out may mean winning 2-3 games or it may mean 5-6. But don’t mortgage the future to have a ceiling of 8-9 wins for a year or two before the hole just gets crazy deep again.
This post was edited on 2/27/25 at 10:23 am
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
123895 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 10:04 am to
quote:

The cap will be in significantly better shape next season


We will see.

We are about to see immense cap manipulation so there's no way to know what next year looks like yet.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451312 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Just stop with the pushing of shite into the future, you’re likely going to bottom out in the process but at least you’re moving towards the ability to have REAL flexibility again as an organization.


Even in the article I just lit $9 on fire to read, it presumes guys taking pay cuts and filling out a huge chunk of our roster with min salary guys
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
75686 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 10:06 am to
Saints and his agent are talking now. I suspect it’ll get done.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
123895 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

it presumes guys taking pay cuts


Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
75686 posts
Posted on 2/27/25 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Even in the article I just lit $9 on fire to read, it presumes guys taking pay cuts and filling out a huge chunk of our roster with min salary guys


Jordan and Hill taking pay cuts. And isn’t that what everyone wants, a bunch of bad players? That’s how you tank in the NFL. What’s the problem?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram