- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints had facemask picture on front page of website
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:25 pm to ThatOtherDave
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:25 pm to ThatOtherDave
By the way, am I the only one who thought Peterson's fumble was a legit fumble? I thought Hochuli's explanation made as much sense as a football bat.
This post was edited on 10/8/08 at 1:26 pm
2
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:30 pm to The Sad Banana
quote:
am I the only one who thought Peterson's fumble was a legit fumble?
I think it could've gone either way, my mom thinks it was a fumble.
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:31 pm to The Sad Banana
I need to see the replay of the fumble again. To me it looked like he did not have complete possession when the knee hit the ground. Maybe about 85% possession. Either way it was close enough to give us the call to make up for the missed facemask.
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:39 pm to Towelie
quote:Your mom and I are tight like that.
I think it could've gone either way, my mom thinks it was a fumble
quote:Is there a such thing as 85% possession? Isn't that like being a little bit pregnant? I mean, either he had possession or he didn't. To me, the ball was knocked out before the knee hit the ground. That, and correct me if I'm wrong here, constitutes a fumble in the NFL.
I need to see the replay of the fumble again. To me it looked like he did not have complete possession when the knee hit the ground. Maybe about 85% possession. Either way it was close enough to give us the call to make up for the missed facemask.
Either way, the point is moot.
This post was edited on 10/8/08 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:41 pm to araby
quote:
I have done your mom from both behind and missionary so I know she is an ugly whore.
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:45 pm to The Sad Banana
quote:
Is there a such thing as 85% possession?
Ha ha, I don't know. I'm just pulling shite out of my arse at this point trying to come up with a logical viewpoint of what the refs actually saw.
85% possession, little bit pregnant, pre-heated oven, half asleep, it's all the same.
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:47 pm to Towelie
Towelie, can we just agree that it was a missed call? I understand your point regarding the angle of Guns' view and the fact that it was not his call to make. Regardless of the blown call, it is over and we cannot do anything about it.
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:49 pm to araby
quote:
can we just agree that it was a missed call?
of course it was a missed call
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:49 pm to clooneyisgod
I love their explanation:
quote:
I called the Saints about it this morning, and they said it was the highest-resolution shot they had of Bush, who returned two punts for touchdowns in the 30-27 loss.
Posted on 10/8/08 at 1:59 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
what do you idiots not get about the fact that Ed's job is to look for holding on the offensive line?
Then he wasn't doing his job in the first place. He seemed to be looking at none other than Reggie Bush on that play not the offensive line.
Posted on 10/8/08 at 2:23 pm to purplepylon
quote:
Then he wasn't doing his job in the first place. He seemed to be looking at none other than Reggie Bush on that play not the offensive line.
From 20 yards away, you can tell where his eyes are looking? its not possible he is looking at couple of offensive lineman a couple yards to the right or left of reggie?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News