- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:10 pm to Chadzilla
The timing of this seems strange unless this is to reposition draft capital to trade for another player.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:10 pm to Chadzilla
So Essentially it costs a 2nd and 3rd to get Philly to push one of their firsts into the future? And we don't know who will even be available at our picks since this happened before the draft? We got trade raped.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:11 pm to Chadzilla
So in essence, we traded a:
future 1st
future 2nd
this year's 3rd
for #16.
nope.
future 1st
future 2nd
this year's 3rd
for #16.
nope.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:11 pm to Chadzilla
quote:
2023 first-round pick
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:11 pm to Fun Bunch
My bird eye view would say that only makes sense if they are trying to get a QB, unless there’s someone else they are obsessing over
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:12 pm to SouthMSReb
We traded a 1st round pick, 3rd Round pick, our 1st next year, a 2nd in 2024...to move up 2 spots and pick up a mid-late 1st.
This is 100% an all move for a team that is far from being an all in team.
This is just fricking weird.
This is 100% an all move for a team that is far from being an all in team.
This is just fricking weird.
This post was edited on 4/4/22 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:12 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
we're taking WR and tackle now
Has to be the strategy. And I don't hate it but this is still an odd trade.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:12 pm to Chadzilla
This trade a month before the draft makes absolutely no sense.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:12 pm to lsualum01
DK metcalf come on down?
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:13 pm to bwallcubfan
quote:
So no first round pick next year?
we're using our 2023 first round pick a year early.
And gambling that we have a better record this year than we did last year
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:13 pm to Fun Bunch
And if we are doing this to get ahead of the Chargers...why wouldn't the Chargers just give up like a 3rd or two or something to move up two spots on draft day?
This is so strange.
This is so strange.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:13 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
My bird eye view would say that only makes sense if they are trying to get a QB, unless there’s someone else they are obsessing over
But it doesn't seem to make sense for us to jump only the Chargers for a QB.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:14 pm to wildtigercat93
So basically we traded a 1st for a 2023 1st, a 2024 2nd, and a 2022 3rd. Don't know that I like but I guess they figure we need 2 immediate starters this year.
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:14 pm to saintsfan22
I don't get this trade at all
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:14 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:I'm so confused.
This seems like absolute trade rape.
What.
I am totally perplexed.
If we remove the 6th/7th rounders because those have little value.
We swapped 18 for 16 & 19, so we get an extra 1st this season. But it cost us a 1st, a 2nd, and a 3rd to do that?
And unless we're pretty darn good, that 1st we'll be around the same spot next season.
What?
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:14 pm to msstate7
Rapoport’s opinion
“Rationale for the #Saints: This trade gives them three picks in the Top 50 and hopefully that 1 next year is a back-end.
Rationale for #Eagles: They now don’t have to pay 3 1st fully guaranteed contracts, get an extra 1 next year either for a QB or to build around a QB”
“Rationale for the #Saints: This trade gives them three picks in the Top 50 and hopefully that 1 next year is a back-end.
Rationale for #Eagles: They now don’t have to pay 3 1st fully guaranteed contracts, get an extra 1 next year either for a QB or to build around a QB”
This post was edited on 4/4/22 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:14 pm to saints5021
Hope they do not do that
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:15 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
But it doesn't seem to make sense for us to jump only the Chargers for a QB.
I think the intent is to use these two picks to trade up again for a QB
The other crazy path (just because of the way this offseason has been), maybe we see Kyler in a saints uniform by Thursday, who knows
Posted on 4/4/22 at 3:16 pm to tigersint
quote:Would seem to me that what we gave up to Philly would be more enticing to a team in the top 10 in a trade up.
Goin after a QB in the top 10
Page 2 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News