- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Remind me why we traded Sproles?
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:48 pm
(no message)
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:48 pm to snow517
HE WOULDN'T TAKE A PAY CUT.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:49 pm to snow517
Our running backs arent the problem.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:50 pm to goatmilker
He shouldn't have taken a pay cut and he is more than a running back.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:52 pm to snow517
quote:
He shouldn't have taken a pay cut
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:53 pm to snow517
Because his production is declining and his cap hit was too high. He wouldn't have made an difference in our games since he can't pass rush, or replace Hicks or Bunkley.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:53 pm to snow517
aging RB.
not a big deal in my opinion.
and... I think Payton's creativity with Sproles in the offense had run its course.
I'm sure I'll get roasted for saying that though.
not a big deal in my opinion.
and... I think Payton's creativity with Sproles in the offense had run its course.
I'm sure I'll get roasted for saying that though.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 9:54 pm to snow517
Because Graham and Brees told him to frick off that's their money.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 10:00 pm to saintsfan22
cap hit and they thought his production was either going to drop or he wouldn't stay healthy. And...if you're watching the game. He's out...with an injury.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 10:23 pm to snow517
Because we needed a $54 million safety to take our #4 D to the next level
Posted on 10/12/14 at 10:25 pm to snow517
We didn't trade him. Also, you're stupid.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 10:27 pm to ClientNumber9
quote:We did.
We didn't trade him.
Posted on 10/12/14 at 11:21 pm to Hoodoo Man
The zombie thread.... Comes back to life every Sunday
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:00 am to snow517
quote:
Remind me why we traded Sproles?
Remind me why you think we need him?
Posted on 10/13/14 at 5:46 am to snow517
quote:
Remind me why we traded Sproles/Let Harper and Jenkins go?
every frickin time a former Saint makes even the most minor of plays this question gets askeed
The didn't fit our system, or too big a cap hit, or insert whatever you want to hear to make you feel better. It doesn't matter they aren't on the team on so why care?
Posted on 10/13/14 at 8:07 am to snow517
quote:
Remind me why we traded Sproles?
Because Travaris Cadet can do a pretty good job in that role for a fraction of the cost. He's averaging 8.3 yards per reception, which is exactly what Sproles averaged in his big 2011 season.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 8:21 am to DCBJR6
lets just say we had to pay JIMMY, Sproles hadnt done anything in two years, and everyones been wanting Jenkins and Harper gone for two or three years.
Yall have to give up on this all ready. If our team was winning and the defense was rolling, no one would care about those players.. you dont see anyone wanting Lance Moore or Vilma back...
Yall have to give up on this all ready. If our team was winning and the defense was rolling, no one would care about those players.. you dont see anyone wanting Lance Moore or Vilma back...
Posted on 10/13/14 at 8:26 am to HHSTigerAlumni
It's a far gone conclusion that no matter what, there will be those "glass half empty" type of fans who think they could do a better job as GM.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 8:58 am to snow517
He's getting old. There was some noticeable decline.
It's better to let a player leave one contract too soon than one contract too late. It wasn't worth tying him to us for years to come. Our other rb's and young playmakers are fine as a replacement. Letting him go isn't what's wrong with this team.
It's better to let a player leave one contract too soon than one contract too late. It wasn't worth tying him to us for years to come. Our other rb's and young playmakers are fine as a replacement. Letting him go isn't what's wrong with this team.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News