- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/14/10 at 9:57 pm to TimTheTiger
quote:
I see these days even the Saints players have no idea how to use "Who Dat?" properly.
I find it ironic that a phrase, "who dat", which is purposefully phonetically absurd in its own right, is subject to a grammar lesson. The word "dat" is present in the phrase (technically not a valid term), yet it's perfectly ok to talk about the proper usage of a term that technically doesn't exist? Really?
How about...let's just fricking enjoy life. I vote for that. Couldn't give a damn whether the players who won a Super Bowl for themselves and the fans (us) use "who dat" properly.
Chillax, guy.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:22 pm to jdrumdog
Hes not the only one who has Tweeted that so it must be something they are all saying.
Drew and McCray have both used it also
Who Dat? Two Dat!
Drew and McCray have both used it also
Who Dat? Two Dat!
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:33 pm to Meateye
Any word on Harper's tender?
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:35 pm to Chrome
quote:No but hes been to all the OTAs and stuff so I think everything will be ok with him.
Any word on Harper's tender?
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:39 pm to Meateye
Hopefully Pierre could show the Saints he's worth top ten RB money during the season. Looking forward to 1200 yds and 10 TD's.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:12 pm to coldhotwings
If PT produces like a top 10 back this season wout a long term deal already in place he is gone IMO.
Saints won't spend top 10 money on 2 backs, they won't franchise him, so unless Reggie is cut or renegotiates that last year PT would probably find Turner money in FA.
Saints won't spend top 10 money on 2 backs, they won't franchise him, so unless Reggie is cut or renegotiates that last year PT would probably find Turner money in FA.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:19 pm to tigerguy121
Hell yea!!!!!
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:25 pm to ninthward
Posted on 6/14/10 at 11:55 pm to Meateye
Twitter is over capacity.
Too many tweets! Please wait a moment and try again.
Too many tweets! Please wait a moment and try again.
Posted on 6/15/10 at 2:29 am to Meateye
Two Dat, meaning they want a second SB win.
Posted on 6/15/10 at 6:14 am to jdrumdog
"Chillax"? What is this, the 80's? What I posted wasn't a grammar lesson, you douchewaffletwatjackoffmacock. I was simply pointing out some irony. Panties wound up a little tight there, Sally, or are you just upset the batteries ran out on your fleshlight and you've got no replacements?
Annoying prick.
Annoying prick.
This post was edited on 6/15/10 at 6:15 am
Posted on 6/15/10 at 7:26 am to RaginCajunsULL
quote:
what if they are doing this to trade him?
It's possible, but improbable.
Sean Payton loves his screens, and PT is the greatest screen runner the Saints have ever had.
Posted on 6/15/10 at 7:31 am to TimTheTiger
quote:
or are you just upset the batteries ran out on your fleshlight
can't stop laughing
Posted on 6/15/10 at 8:18 am to RaginCajunsULL
quote:
just a couple of days ago his agent said he wasn't even close to getting a new deal. And now all of a sudden he signs his tender...
This doesn't really change anything. Pierre could still hold out. I think the Saints could have lowered the tender offer soon if he didn't accept it. So, he probably signed it to prevent that.
Posted on 6/15/10 at 8:27 am to moneyg
quote:You must be Albert Einstein
I think the Saints could have lowered the tender offer soon if he didn't accept it. So, he probably signed it to prevent that.
Posted on 6/15/10 at 8:58 am to Meateye
quote:
You must be Albert Einstein
...says the guy who believes this, in itself, is big news.
Now, if he decides to play the entire year under this contract, then it is meaningful.
Posted on 6/15/10 at 9:09 am to Meateye
I think he might be Richard Gordon of the glorious '72'-'76 era checking in
spurs an idea for a thread...
spurs an idea for a thread...
Posted on 6/15/10 at 11:13 am to blueslover
i figured he would. i think hes going to try and work on a long term contract like he said. i dont see trading as an option.
i love that we got that empticon
i love that we got that empticonPosted on 6/15/10 at 12:21 pm to TimTheTiger
I don't see any problem with it.
Tweet hand for: Who dat say dey gonna beat dem Saints? No one. Therefore, two dat!
And seriously, get some medication.
No, seriously.
Tweet hand for: Who dat say dey gonna beat dem Saints? No one. Therefore, two dat!
And seriously, get some medication.
No, seriously.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News