- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Only two rookies in the last 10 years have lead game-winning drives in back-to-back games
Posted on 12/16/25 at 12:22 am
Posted on 12/16/25 at 12:22 am
Posted on 12/16/25 at 12:57 am to L.A.
I understand the stat, but at same time I wonder why they needed the game winning drive in first place
Posted on 12/16/25 at 1:42 am to Stamps74
quote:
I understand the stat, but at same time I wonder why they needed the game winning drive in first place
Because a team starting a rookie QB, outside of injury, is a damning sign of a not-so-good roster overall.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 4:53 am to L.A.
Would have had 3 if Olave didnt alligator arm that pass that hit him in his hands.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 6:03 am to Stamps74
quote:
I understand the stat, but at same time I wonder why they needed the game winning drive in first place
I don't know, why did Drew Brees have to have 53 game winning drives?
Why did Tom Brady have to have 58 game winning drives?
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:00 am to ShrevetownTiger
Brees would have like 100 game winning drives his his defense didn't routinely shite the bed at the end of games.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:08 am to Stamps74
quote:
I understand the stat, but at same time I wonder why they needed the game winning drive in first place
It seems like every NFL game I catch for years comes down to the last drive.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 9:32 am to Stamps74
quote:
I understand the stat, but at same time I wonder why they needed the game winning drive in first place
Whew there's some dumb posts on this board but this one is close to the top.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 9:35 am to Stamps74
quote:
I understand the stat, but at same time I wonder why they needed the game winning drive in first place
Trying to get like baseball where they have these combined facts in order to have some obscure stat. It's interesting but does seem a bit unnecessary.
Would be cool to know how many rookies in the last 10 years have lead game-winning drives in back-to-back games; regardless of the other team's record. Then you can add the, "but the only 2 to do it against teams with winning records..." caveat.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 9:37 am to Sunnyvale
quote:
Would have had 3 if Olave didnt alligator arm that pass that hit him in his hands
It would have been 3 game-winning drives in a row, but it would have missed the "against teams with a winning record" part of the tweet since Miami was 4-7 going into that game.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 11:59 am to Stamps74
Because it’s professional football with every player being an NFL football player.
This isn’t high school or even college where there is/can be a huge talent discrepancy between teams. I swear we have done if the dumbest fans sometimes.
This isn’t high school or even college where there is/can be a huge talent discrepancy between teams. I swear we have done if the dumbest fans sometimes.
Popular
Back to top

2








