0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jordyn Tyson the player
Posted on 11/6/26 at 6:04 am to goatmilker
Posted on 11/6/26 at 6:04 am to goatmilker
quote:
Yeah listening to Tyler it didn't sound like he was ready yet. We'll see. I would guess next week and fingers crossed
It was a fair and refreshing answer Shough gave along the lines of "We'll continue to get the reps and build the chemistry on the practice field, but it's unknown what it'll be like in games. It could be greater than we imagine or worse, but either way it'll be on us to gameplan and get him ready".
If he is healthy you play him and sit Bryce Lance. Lance even after 7 games still doesn't have great chemistry with Shough so its not like it would be a big drop off from that standpoint, plus Tyson obviously has the higher upside.
If playbook & snap count are the question, then gameplan some snaps & plays for Tyson and utilize Barion Brown the rest of the snaps that would have normally gone to Lance. Brown to me has earned the right for more snaps.
Not hating on Lance either, he's performing okay for a 4th rd pick. It could be a lot better or a lot worse. Nothing against the WR he might become but as of right now he still struggles recognizing blitzes and hot routes
Posted on 11/6/26 at 6:57 am to DBG
quote:
thought he was very, very clearly the best WR prospect in this past draft
Lol
Posted on 11/6/26 at 7:14 am to Lester Earl
What's so funny? Tate was clearly better?
Posted on 11/6/26 at 7:45 am to Proximo
The same argument that happened at draft time. The same argument happened when they traded a Ricky Williams-like draft pick lot for Chris Olave
If you are taking a WR in the top 10 he better be generational or have generational traits, and Tyson was never that.
So when someone says him vs the field, it’s worth a laugh, especially at a position like WR when so many great players come from down the draft board. There is very little separation in talent from Tyson vs a player taken at 30 or even 75. This is already proving to be true and we are just halfway through the rookie year. Coupled with his injury history, this was a huge reach by the team.
If you are taking a WR in the top 10 he better be generational or have generational traits, and Tyson was never that.
So when someone says him vs the field, it’s worth a laugh, especially at a position like WR when so many great players come from down the draft board. There is very little separation in talent from Tyson vs a player taken at 30 or even 75. This is already proving to be true and we are just halfway through the rookie year. Coupled with his injury history, this was a huge reach by the team.
This post was edited on 11/6/26 at 7:48 am
Posted on 11/6/26 at 8:45 am to Lester Earl
quote:
There is very little separation in talent from Tyson vs a player taken at 30 or even 75.
Hard disagree
Posted on 11/6/26 at 10:46 am to DBG
There’s not even a point in debating it. It’s always the field. I guess it still has to be said D
Posted on 11/6/26 at 10:54 am to Lester Earl
I don’t disagree that WRs are trending towards how RBs are in terms of value. And you know I respect your #evals.
I think Tyson is special.
I think Tyson is special.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 11:01 am to DBG
quote:
I think Tyson is special.
Agree. When he had Olave smiling at his skill set, you know he's special. It's not like Olave doesn't know talent when he sees it, either.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 11:19 am to DBG
quote:
think Tyson is special.
He is perennially injured. The chances he ever reaches a sustained elite level is slim to none due to that.
That’s not even factoring what we think his talent level is. That in itself made it a poor investment for what was a top 10 pick at a deep position
Posted on 11/6/26 at 11:24 am to Lester Earl
quote:
He is perennially injured. The chances he ever reaches a sustained elite level is slim to none due to that.
That’s not even factoring what we think his talent level is. That in itself made it a poor investment for what was a top 10 pick at a deep position
opinions like these never backfire. never ever.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 11:24 am to Lester Earl
We’ll see. I said in pre draft I didn’t want Tyson due to injury concerns. But he’s here and about to play and I think it’s worth mentioning that talent wise, he’s way up there, imo.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 11:48 am to Chad504boy
quote:
opinions like these never backfire. never ever.
I’m not sure you’ve been right about anything regarding the saints in the last decade. lol
Posted on 11/6/26 at 11:50 am to Lester Earl
quote:
I’m not sure you’ve been right about anything regarding the saints in the last decade. lol
cute remark. complete load of shite. but cute.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 11:53 am to Chad504boy
People use the word investment then at the first dip want to dump it. Its not how investment works.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:03 pm to goatmilker
There’s dumbass Loomis-lover #2
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:10 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
There’s dumbass Loomis-lover #2
No need to lie and be a bitter, humorless pile of sh!t Fester.
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:56 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
That’s not even factoring what we think his talent level is. That in itself made it a poor investment for what was a top 10 pick at a deep position
Are you trying to say that his talent level wasn't factored in when picking an injury prone WR in the Top 10? That's the ONLY reason he was picked there. Its the main thing that was factored in.
?
This post was edited on 11/6/26 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:23 pm to Dantheman504
No, I’m saying he wasn’t only polarizing due to injuries. His talent wasn’t universally agreed upon & that only makes it more of a reach. But the injuries alone were enough to say NO
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:33 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
He is perennially injured. The chances he ever reaches a sustained elite level is slim to none due to that.
This obviously has validity, but it's not what is being discussed. This thread is about "Jordyn Tyson the player".
You said you see very little difference between him and those drafted at 30-75. Is that solely based on his ability...or were you weighting that opinion based on the injury?
This post was edited on 11/6/26 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 11/6/26 at 2:53 pm to moneyg
quote:
His talent wasn’t universally agreed upon
I would imagine money that 99% of mock drafts and experts in and out of the game had him in the first round. So let some people hang their hat on that 1% and celebrate it
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News