- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:05 am to SenGooner
Or maybe we just have a lot of posters on here softer than Tysons hamstrings that melt about anyone playing devils advocate
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:06 am to Jojodaddy
If his injury history is not even a small red flag on his evaluation then they are pointless. We all want a no red flags pick.
It's why I think we pass on Bain and Tysom at 8. Both great players and first round picks.
It's why I think we pass on Bain and Tysom at 8. Both great players and first round picks.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:41 am to Fun Bunch
He can’t risk a 76273848th soft tissue injury before the draft
Posted on 4/18/26 at 12:02 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:If you honestly have zero concerns about this injury history, then I can only assume you have no concerns about any player in the draft (or are just being disingenuous to get responses). I get it if you just like his skill set so much that the "swing for the fences" pick is worth the concerns about his injury history. However, I cannot see anyone having no concerns.
Why would I? Of course I don’t.
This post was edited on 4/18/26 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 4/19/26 at 8:34 am to NOSHAU
Yeah “no concerns “ is a bit strange. I’m desperately wanting a wr and even I can’t overlook the fact that he’s been hurt A LOT and that gives me some pause. If someone does draft Tyson and he remains healthy then they are likely getting one of the best values in the entire draft. (Dependent on where he’s taken obviously). I have a feeling he ends up tumbling but I wouldn’t melt if the Saints grabbed him at 8. But I think everyone paying attention def has plenty of concerns.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 1:16 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
You have no concerns? If not, why?
He never had a repeated injury.
He came back from the worst one and then had a hammy? We just don’t draft anyone who had a hamstring injury now?
Posted on 4/19/26 at 2:14 pm to Hester Carries
quote:
He never had a repeated injury.
Injury prone players don’t have to repeat injuries. Kendre Miller for example. Lotsa soft tissue and now structural.
When you injure one spot, you can over compensate for it and injure another.
Tyson is off my board. We need reliable above average and consistent starter from that pick.
That said, if forced to lay down some cash I’d bet he’s the pick. Too much smoke.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 2:18 pm to jkylejohnson
Why would I have concerns? No one has explained it yet they just repeat the same things.
Why would I be concerned about 3 completely different injuries to 3 completely different body parts?
Why would I be concerned about 3 completely different injuries to 3 completely different body parts?
Posted on 4/19/26 at 2:19 pm to Jojodaddy
quote:
Injury prone players
Mindless nonsense
Posted on 4/19/26 at 2:33 pm to Fun Bunch
Just watched his workout.
Dude looks like Randy Moss when he got drafted by the Patriots out of California.
Saints are taking him.
Dude looks like Randy Moss when he got drafted by the Patriots out of California.
Saints are taking him.
This post was edited on 4/19/26 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 4/19/26 at 2:37 pm to Fun Bunch
Bc he is extremely “oft injured “. Separate injuries or not they’re still injuries. Multiple injuries throughout his career significantly reducing his playing time. I don’t know any other way to put it. I get what you’re saying but to not have SOME concern is wild. Every scout in the league has concerns with Tyson due to him always having an injury. No matter how you wanna look at it or frame it the baw is injured a lot and ppl have noticed. I’d take the risk even at 8 but I could totally see why he’d tumble also.
And to be clear I’m fine (happy even ) to take Tyson at 8. I love the kid and he has insane upside. He’s better than Chris Olave from day 1 imo
And to be clear I’m fine (happy even ) to take Tyson at 8. I love the kid and he has insane upside. He’s better than Chris Olave from day 1 imo
This post was edited on 4/19/26 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 4/19/26 at 2:37 pm to Jojodaddy
quote:
Injury prone players don’t have to repeat injuries. Kendre Miller for example. Lotsa soft tissue and now structural. When you injure one spot, you can over compensate for it and injure another. Tyson is off my board. We need reliable above average and consistent starter from that pick. That said, if forced to lay down some cash I’d bet he’s the pick. Too much smoke.
He tore his knee. Broke a collarbone. And then dealt with a hamstring years later.
wtf are you talking about?
So if a guy has a broken arm his freshman year, then takes a helmet to the knee and tears an ACL his junior year, you are saying that makes him “injury prone” in a way that is meaningful at all?
Lol
Posted on 4/19/26 at 2:46 pm to jkylejohnson
quote:
Bc he is extremely “oft injured
Meaningless nonsense part 2
If a guy is constantly getting soft tissue injuries that are similar, ok.
If he has multiple knee injuries, ok.
His injuries are completely different and unrelated.
This post was edited on 4/19/26 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 4/19/26 at 2:50 pm to Hester Carries
These same guys would never have drafted Shough.
You have to go a little deeper than just “he got injured a couple of times”
What are the injuries? How did he get them? How did he recover?
Has the training staff looked at him. What do they think?
Literally every player is a risk. Look at the top 10 for the past decade. 60%+ bums.
Trust your evaluations and thats all you can do
You have to go a little deeper than just “he got injured a couple of times”
What are the injuries? How did he get them? How did he recover?
Has the training staff looked at him. What do they think?
Literally every player is a risk. Look at the top 10 for the past decade. 60%+ bums.
Trust your evaluations and thats all you can do
Posted on 4/19/26 at 2:51 pm to Fun Bunch
Okay fella. Being injured often and being oft injured mean literally the same thing. Has he not often been injured ?
The answer is 1000% yes. I’m not calling him injury prone. It’s less bothersome than one being injury prone but still cause for SOME concern. Go argue with a wall
The answer is 1000% yes. I’m not calling him injury prone. It’s less bothersome than one being injury prone but still cause for SOME concern. Go argue with a wall
Posted on 4/19/26 at 3:00 pm to jkylejohnson
Well the question would be: so what?
Because he broke his collarbone and tore his knee he’s somehow just going to keep getting injured?
Because he broke his collarbone and tore his knee he’s somehow just going to keep getting injured?
Posted on 4/19/26 at 3:02 pm to Fun Bunch
Maybe. Hence the concern. I take the risk with the pick. Or take lemon. But I’m not that “bothered” by it. I’m just making a point that “some concern “ is warranted. You disagree. We agree to disagree. Or I do at least. Carry on.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 3:04 pm to jkylejohnson
Maybe. Based on what?
What
Do
The
Injuries
Have
To
Do
With
Each
Other
?
What
Do
The
Injuries
Have
To
Do
With
Each
Other
?
Posted on 4/19/26 at 3:10 pm to Fun Bunch
Nothing. At all.
BUT
THEY
ARE
STILL
GODDAM
INJURIES
BUT
THEY
ARE
STILL
GODDAM
INJURIES
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News