Ideal scenario where there could be unilateral support among all Saints fans

quote:

---

Saints acquire browns 2nd round pick 33 (first of day 2), 3rd round pick 67 and next year's 2nd. Maye toss in a pick swap next year. That gives us now 5 picks in 2nd and 3rd round this year.

---

That is terrible value for a trade back from 9 to 33.

You would have to get next year's 1st from them.

quote:

---

Saints acquire browns 2nd round pick 33 (first of day 2), 3rd round pick 67 and next year's 2nd. Maye toss in a pick swap next year. That gives us now 5 picks in 2nd and 3rd round this year

---

A 2nd, a 3rd this year and the value of a 3rd (2nd next year) for #9 overall? Please don’t be absurd. Although, we are talking about Mickey Loomis so he would probably do it for less.

quote:

---

To move from 27 to 14, we gave up our following year 1st.

---

and we hated it for years and didn't give up two 2nd's and a 3rd neither. it was next year's 1 plus a 5th.

its possible we could squeeze more out the trade bc its for a qb but i'm just trying to be mildly cautious when throwing ideas against the wall.

quote:

---

You can throw the trade chart in the trash

---

thanks bunch. very convenient when you're arguing against simple logic of math adding up exactly.

In this scenario we are getting the closest pick to round 1 that possibly exists, the 3rd pick of the 3rd round and a 2nd round pick next year plus i said a pick swap of sorts. The precise details of the trade don't overly fricking matter to me tbh. I also said i'm just being cautious with the trade ideas, i hate when people throw pie in the sky expectations out there.

quote:

---

and we hated it for years and didn't give up two 2nd's and a 3rd neither. it was next year's 1 plus a 5th.

---

Many did not hate it for years. I was told Davenport was the next Reggie White and elite edge rushers so not grow on trees and the cost to acquire was peanuts.

Only when it was apparent Loomis and scouting busted on the selection and cost to acquire did those who loved the trade start to hate it.

quote:

---

I was told Davenport was the next Reggie White

---

Let's see it

quote:

---

Its not as simple as math.

First of all, not all teams are slavish to the jimmy johnson trade chart and there have been MANY trades that don't align with it.

You are asking a team to move not just out of the top 10, but out of the first round. There is a premium involved in that large of a trade back, even in what is seen as a weak at the top draft.

---

jesus bunch. i don't overly give a flying frick about arguing over next year's first or not. I'm not sure we squeeze both pick 33 and next year's first. maybe who the frick knows. Getting pick 33 is arguably more valuable than a late first. Teams have all night to throw trade ideas at you.

I support this trade because Loomis would get fired on the spot for such a shite arse trade.

quote:

---

Saints acquire browns 2nd round pick 33 (first of day 2), 3rd round pick 67 and next year's 2nd. Maye toss in a pick swap next year. That gives us now 5 picks in 2nd and 3rd round this year.

---

Would be the biggest fleecing in draft history.

0/32 teams would give up a top 10 pick to move out of the first round and not get any kind of first rounder in return.

More likely Pittsburgh trade up from 21.

Trade scenario from RJackson would be like

Pitt #9

NOR #21, 3rd rd pick Mid 80ish, 2026 1st Rd pick .

This is very similar to what KC did to trade up from 27 to 10 to get Mahomes.