- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GM for a Day
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:35 am to geauxtigers87
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:35 am to geauxtigers87
Yep. Pretty stupid.
0
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:37 am to WhoDatTigahsTampa
When you finish 7-9 three yrs in a row, nobody is untouchable. Favre wasn't, Montana wasn't, Brees isn't. He's great, first-ballot HOFer, still has gas in the tank but it's pushing toward "E."
BTW, if you wouldn't trade Brees for Vonn Miller straight up you are letting a mancrush get in the way of good bidness.
BTW, if you wouldn't trade Brees for Vonn Miller straight up you are letting a mancrush get in the way of good bidness.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:41 am to TigerJeff
If you think they would ever trade Miller for Brees straight up, you're a dumb fk. Not saying you are, but no one would ever make that deal. Lol. Brees and a 1st, possible.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 8:43 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:43 am to TigerJeff
You've been sufficiently destroyed in this thread but I'll entertain it anyway
Brees has a no trade clause, and Denver would NEVER do this. Ever.
Why would Jacksonville do this? They could stand pat and get a better RB themselves. Only way they'd do this is if they got additional capital as well. Future picks.
Why do this if we are trading Brees? Trading for Butler is a win-now move. We'd be better off standing pat and getting a young CB at that spot.
Where are you going to get the pick to take Pocic? You are already giving up 32 for Butler, our 2nd in the 'Brees trade', and likely both 3rds or more in the Fournette trade, as established. Even then, Pocic might not make it to the 3rd.
Also, the whole "retired player" to coach is stupid and almost never happens.
Glad we did all of this clever maneuvering to put a hell of a team around Chase Daniel.
Why?
quote:
1. Brees+ 2d pick to Denv. for Vonn Miller + Paxton Lynch
Brees has a no trade clause, and Denver would NEVER do this. Ever.
quote:
2. Ingram + No. 11 pick to JAX for No. 4 pick. Take Fournette.
Why would Jacksonville do this? They could stand pat and get a better RB themselves. Only way they'd do this is if they got additional capital as well. Future picks.
quote:
3. No. 32 to N.E. for Butler
Why do this if we are trading Brees? Trading for Butler is a win-now move. We'd be better off standing pat and getting a young CB at that spot.
quote:
4. Draft Ethan Pocic; move Chopsley Strief to O-line coach
Where are you going to get the pick to take Pocic? You are already giving up 32 for Butler, our 2nd in the 'Brees trade', and likely both 3rds or more in the Fournette trade, as established. Even then, Pocic might not make it to the 3rd.
Also, the whole "retired player" to coach is stupid and almost never happens.
quote:
5. Chase Daniel starts; Lynch is QB of future
Glad we did all of this clever maneuvering to put a hell of a team around Chase Daniel.
quote:
6. Sign AP.
Why?
This post was edited on 4/13/17 at 7:45 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:58 am to Rand AlThor
You're right.
7-9 x 4
7-9 x 4
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:37 am to TigerJeff
quote:
TigerJeff
quote:
Jeff
quote:
JazzyJeff
quote:
Jeff Duncan
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:55 am to TigerJeff
quote:
BTW, if you wouldn't trade Brees for Vonn Miller straight up you are letting a mancrush get in the way of good bidness.
And if you think Denver would even make that deal you are straight up delusional.
Green Bay had a guy to take over after Favre, San Fran had a guy to take over after Montana. If you think our Defense is good enough to carry this team with Daniel/Lynch even with Von Miller you are crazy
Posted on 4/12/17 at 10:23 am to TigerJeff
quote:
JAX gets a proven top 10 NFL RB and a pick only 7 spots lower?
at that highpoint of the draft "only seven spots" is worth a kings ransom
Posted on 4/12/17 at 10:51 am to TigerJeff
quote:
You're right.
7-9 x 4
Thats all you got?
At least you confirmed you're trolling, thanks bud
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:12 am to WhoDatTigahsTampa
What does
have to do with
?
quote:
The fact that people get so infuriated when people call him Daniels is
have to do with
quote:
Daniel is and will always be a bum in this league
?
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:13 am to TigerJeff
quote:
BTW, if you wouldn't trade Brees for Vonn Miller straight up you are letting a mancrush get in the way of good bidness.
I agree 100%. Von is like a 99 OVR on madden and Drew is just a 92 OVR
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:38 am to TigerJeff
quote:
1. Brees+ 2d pick to Denv. for Vonn Miller + Paxton Lynch
2. Ingram + No. 11 pick to JAX for No. 4 pick. Take Fournette.
will both of these franchises also have retarded GMs for a day? That's the only way either deal would ever get done.
Elway: ahh yes aging QB for the cornerstone of the defense our team is built around oh and the QB we drafted last year to groom? Well I'd say no but since you threw in that 2nd rounder, I'm in.
Jags: Ok so we take Ingram and his contract to move back in the draft and you draft the younger, cheaper, better RB? frick yes, we're in.
Jeff if you could sell those shittastic deals to two GMs, you'd be GM for life.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 11:44 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:40 am to knowingabyss
HAHAHA 
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:46 am to TigerJeff
quote:
1. Brees+ 2d pick to Denv. for Vonn Miller + Paxton Lynch
Brees has a no trade clause. So that's out.
quote:
2. Ingram + No. 11 pick to JAX for No. 4 pick. Take Fournette.
What other picks are you giving up? 2nd rounder and next year's first would be a minimum in addition, almost certainly more. You're giving up all that for a RB?
quote:
4. Draft Ethan Pocic; move Chopsley Strief to O-line coach
Is Strief a slave now that can't choose to work elsewhere?
quote:
5. Chase Daniel starts; Lynch is QB of future
Chase Daniel sucks, and Lynch does too.
In short, you're dumb.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:51 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:Means he's a bum and the fact that some people call him Daniel(s) shouldn't get under the skin of people as much as it does. But it does. And I find it
have to do with
.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 12:10 pm to TigerJeff
quote:
Again, I am a Brees fan. But, 7-9 x 3. He's turning 39. My assumption is his huge contract and Miller's cancel out
You gotta understand you're going to get shite on by the homers here any time you mention the saints without Brees. Most of these boneheads have no foresight. Brees has this year, and maybe next. That's it, if the Saints are still playing with Brees after the 2018 season it will be a pathetic shite show. But I don't think your trace is logical from Denver's or Jaxville's stand point.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 12:14 pm to Snipe
quote:
You gotta understand you're going to get shite on by the homers here any time you mention the saints without Brees. Most of these boneheads have no foresight. Brees has this year, and maybe next.
We can't all just make shite up and fail to back it up like you do.
That whole no trade clause thing too....
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 4/12/17 at 12:15 pm to TigerJeff
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/2/20 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 4/12/17 at 2:06 pm to Fun Bunch
Typical garbage Saints Talk commentary. "Lynch sucks." He was drafted with a mid-first round pick last year, by John Elway, who knows a little something about QB play. So you've made the considered determination "he sucks" based on a few games he played his rookie year? Amazing insight you have. But of course, the QB that the Saints would take in the first round would automatically be amazing, right?
As I admitted, I thought it might be unlikely that Denver would part with Miller for anything. They might consider Brees and a 2 for Miller and Lynch. Doesn't hurt to ask. The fact that I am suggesting the Saints explore this indicates the value I place on Brees ... I wouldn't trade him for anything less than a Vonn Miller-type player. If that is not do-able, I'm perfectly happy with Brees finishing his Hall of Fame career with the Saints this year or next.
As I admitted, I thought it might be unlikely that Denver would part with Miller for anything. They might consider Brees and a 2 for Miller and Lynch. Doesn't hurt to ask. The fact that I am suggesting the Saints explore this indicates the value I place on Brees ... I wouldn't trade him for anything less than a Vonn Miller-type player. If that is not do-able, I'm perfectly happy with Brees finishing his Hall of Fame career with the Saints this year or next.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 3:13 pm to TigerJeff
quote:
Lynch sucks." He was drafted with a mid-first round pick last year, by John Elway, who knows a little something about QB play. So you've made the considered determination "he sucks" based on a few games he played his rookie year? Amazing insight you have. But of course, the QB that the Saints would take in the first round would automatically be amazing, right?
First, he was the 26th pick, not"mid-first round". Second, if he's going to be so good, why:
1) wouldn't be start here
2) be traded for a guy a guy with 1 year on his contract that can't really be tagged for a reasonable amount
quote:
The fact that I am suggesting the Saints explore this indicates that I'm a complete idiot who should go back to the coloring.
quote:
Typical garbage Saints Talk commentary
You started a thread about trading a player with a no trade clause.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News