- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For those that honestly believe this is a conspiracy
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:08 am to CBandits82
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:08 am to CBandits82
quote:
the entire planet sees PI, what is their explanation to not throw it?
Well, I think it looks more egregious on the slow motion replay than it actually did in game speed. It was still a bad no call, but the replay makes it look much worse than it actually was.
3
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:08 am to CBandits82
Yep. It was a willfully ignored call by the entire crew.
No flag
No discussion
No on field conference
No league call in
Not even for the obvious targeting which to me was MORE egregious because they WILL look at that after the fact
No flag
No discussion
No on field conference
No league call in
Not even for the obvious targeting which to me was MORE egregious because they WILL look at that after the fact
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 9:09 am
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:08 am to UpToPar
quote:
Well, I think it looks more egregious on the slow motion replay than it actually did in game speed
Then your opinion is worthless
That's a laughably bad take.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:10 am to UpToPar
Sure, it was a quick play. But refs are taught to err on the side of protecting players and calling the penalty. Then they can wave it off after discussion and/or review.
The opposite happened here. Refs didn't follow the protocol.
The opposite happened here. Refs didn't follow the protocol.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:12 am to UpToPar
I don’t believe the initial call was a conspiracy out side one or a few refs getting bribed.
The coverup is now a full blown conspiracy. Funny how the Saints organization went into hiding.
The coverup is now a full blown conspiracy. Funny how the Saints organization went into hiding.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:13 am to theunknownknight
quote:
They can call in and indicate a conference is needed before the next play to ensure the correct call was made.
They can?
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:16 am to UpToPar
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:16 am to UpToPar
Yes. They are in constant communication with the booth etc. I’m not talking about a 15 minute call in.
I’m talking about a call in within seconds as they see the replay angles before the next play.
ESPECIALLY in regards to helmet to helmet targeting BTW
I’m talking about a call in within seconds as they see the replay angles before the next play.
ESPECIALLY in regards to helmet to helmet targeting BTW
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 9:19 am
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:18 am to liquid rabbit
quote:
Sure, it was a quick play. But refs are taught to err on the side of protecting players and calling the penalty. Then they can wave it off after discussion and/or review.
The opposite happened here. Refs didn't follow the protocol.
I agree, it clearly should have been called. My only point was, the slow motion replay from the sideline makes it look much worse than it actually was. The situation magnifies the impact of the call and makes it seem so much worse.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:20 am to UpToPar
quote:
much worse than it actually was
You have lost any credibility you may have had. It looked bad for every angle in real time. Just stop.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:20 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Yes. They are in constant communication with the booth etc. I’m not talking about a 15 minute call in.
Right, I know they can do this with review-able plays and suspected concussions, but if the booth thinks they saw a hold on replay, they can call down and ask the officials to talk about it? I've never seen them do this.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:21 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You have lost any credibility you may have had. It looked bad for every angle in real time. Just stop.
It SOUNDED bad.
The helmet to helmet could be heard 30 yards away. A cellphone video in the stands picked it up clearly.
I want to hear their explanation on how THAT was missed.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:22 am to UpToPar
quote:
Right, I know they can do this with review-able plays and suspected concussions, but if the booth thinks they saw a hold on replay, they can call down and ask the officials to talk about it? I've never seen them do this.
No they will not call in a hold.
They WILL call in a clear and intentional helmet to helmet targeting because of the concussion lawsuits.
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 9:23 am
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:22 am to UpToPar
I disagree, but even if what you are saying is true, there was able 4 fouls that could/should have been called on that one play. The player even admitted that he knew he was committing a penalty to avoid a TD. The league admitted it was a terrible no call. There are measures in player to get the call right even if the refs miss the call during the game. Al Riveron, whose job it is to run the league officials, told Payton he needed to watch the play and call him back. How is it that the head of officials is not glued to the T.V. during the only game being played by the league?
There was multiple failures of people's jobs during that play.
There was multiple failures of people's jobs during that play.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:22 am to UpToPar
quote:
My only point was, the slow motion replay from the sideline makes it look much worse than it actually was
Are you fricking kidding?
In real time, it's probably one of the most violent looking plays of the year. The defender makes a B line directly at the receiver and lays him out helmet to helmet.
No play on the ball and just decleats the guy
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:23 am to theunknownknight
Kroenke was given a lot of incentives to move his team to LA and the NFL helped him every step of the way. Was a Super Bowl guarantee part of the incentives?
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:24 am to UpToPar
You do realize the commissioner gets paid a bonus every year based on the revenue of the NFL? His base pay is 3.5 mill a tear with bonus checks going upwards of 40 million.
LA is a much larger audience than NO. LA fans will travel longer and spend more money. NFL makes more money. Commissioner gets higher bonus check
LA is a much larger audience than NO. LA fans will travel longer and spend more money. NFL makes more money. Commissioner gets higher bonus check
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:25 am to theunknownknight
quote:
No they will not call in a hold.
They WILL call in a clear and intentional helmet to helmet targeting because of the concussion lawsuits.
Okay, that's fair. I thought you were talking about the PI.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:28 am to Deactived
quote:
In real time, it's probably one of the most violent looking plays of the year. The defender makes a B line directly at the receiver and lays him out helmet to helmet.
No play on the ball and just decleats the guy
Which is a legal play (besides the helmet to helmet) if he gets there the same time the ball does. He was clearly early, but the camera angle from the sideline makes it look like he got there much earlier than he did.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:30 am to UpToPar
This ref cheated pure and simple. He knew it was a penalty and not only did he not throw the flag but in dramatic fashion convinced the other ref that it was not a penalty. There is no chance that he did not see the most obvious PI play that he had seen all season. You call it whatever you want but he cheated. He took so much from us Saints fans. I have no faith in the outcome of any NFL game anymore.
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News