Started By
Message

re: Fleener To Saints, 5 year deal, $36 million

Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:45 am to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178994 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:45 am to
And nobody is mentioning there's a real chance we lose Hill if someone throws money at him. Very possible we let Hill walk and get the 1.6 mill on cap back.
Posted by partywiththelombardi
Member since May 2012
11782 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:51 am to
I like Hill and the potential tandem he could form with Fleener but if someone wants Hill for more than his current tender then oh well. He was a UDFA find and hopefully a camp body or late round pick will replace him.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290876 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:53 am to
quote:

we basically signed him for 3 years 15 mill,


if he plays the 3rd year, he is getting $18mil in guaranteed money


quote:

if he's not performing over those years we cut him with minimum problems


we would have just given him $14mil. If he doesnt pan out, that is a lot of money considering our other holes
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290876 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 9:59 am to
quote:

The tight end received an $8 million signing bonus with $18 million in total guarantees, according to a source. The deal breaks down as follows:

2016: $800,000 base salary (fully guaranteed), $1.6 million prorated signing bonus

2017: $5.8 million base salary (fully guaranteed); $1.6 million prorated signing bonus; $100,000 workout bonus

2018: $6.3 million base salary*; $1.6 million prorated signing bonus; $1000,000 workout bonus
*$3.4 million of base salary is guaranteed for injury, it becomes guaranteed for skill and cap if he is on the roster on the third day of the waiver period
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178994 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:00 am to
quote:

we would have just given him $14mil. If he doesnt pan out, that is a lot of money considering our other holes



i'm ok. I don't think this leaves us in a position where we can't address other holes. We can still get additional cap room, this move only costs 2.4. Next two-3 years with Drew is our real window, this is an excellent offensive addition. We all knew tight end was a NEED>
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:01 am to
Not the best deal ever, but not the worst
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13753 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Everyone is up in arms over the 36 million, we basically signed him for 3 years 15 mill, if he's not performing over those years we cut him with minimum problems. Also, our cap situation is much better next year without all our dead money from this year gone, so paying a guys 6-8 mill isn't that bad.
No, it will be either 3 years/$21 million (as part of the 3rd year is guaranteed) or 2 years/$18 million if he is cut after the second year. $18 million is guaranteed and if he plays the 3rd year, effectively all of it is guaranteed if he is on the roster at the beginning of the season as a veteran.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290876 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:08 am to
Just seeing the Green deal in comparison and then Trevathan deal, just questions the value of Fleener deal. Not that i dont like the player, but this wasnt a must sign.
Posted by LisbethSalander
NOLA
Member since Feb 2016
153 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:08 am to
quote:

we would have just given him $14mil. If he doesnt pan out, that is a lot of money considering our other holes


If he doesn't pan out then it would be a mistake if we paid him 10, or 8. I understand the concern about the product, I just believe that he will be a weapon with Brees. Only concern is that he has had some issues with drops in the past.

quote:

if he plays the 3rd year, he is getting $18mil in guaranteed money


I didn't know this, I haven't read a good breakdown of his contract yet.

I'm optimistic about the pickup. I heard a lot of people wishing for him after Green got signed, I just believe we got our guy, the guarantees aren't crazy high, so we should be excited about the potential not worried about the potential fallout if he doesn't pan out.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63043 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Idk, over 5 years, $36 million is not much at all


Highest paid position player not named Brees (off the top of my head). Does that make sense to you?
Posted by partywiththelombardi
Member since May 2012
11782 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:11 am to
Don't tell that to Mickey and his Must, Needs, and Wants board
Posted by partywiththelombardi
Member since May 2012
11782 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Highest paid position player not named Brees


Actually that is Junior.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178994 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Just seeing the Green deal in comparison


Saints had interest in Green. Obviously they were willing to spend. Not sure if they didn't think Green was as valuable or Green had no interest here. Something not right was there. Saints then moved to Fleener after Green signed. Not like Saints weren't trying with Green.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178994 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Highest paid position player not named Brees


huh?
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
10128 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:36 am to
quote:

No, it will be either 3 years/$21 million (as part of the 3rd year is guaranteed) or 2 years/$18 million if he is cut after the second year. $18 million is guaranteed


No, it would be 2 years/$14.7M if he is cut after his 2nd year. The $18M "guaranteed" figure includes $3.3M in year 3 that is only guaranteed for injury.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:52 am to
Nobody is signing away a guy who never had more than 16 catches in a season and is not known for his blocking.

Hill is staying. We over value (and over hype) him.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178994 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Nobody is signing away a guy who never had more than 16 catches in a season and is not known for his blocking.


hill is not a shabby blocker, he had a very good season a year ago in a limited role, i think he was held back last year with injuries. A team would be smart to nab him with a 3 yr 6.61 million dollar deal. Tight Ends are paid for their presence and difference making abilities in passing game.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 11:59 am to
Didn't say he was a poor blocker, just that it isn't what people would call his strength.

Now where he shines and could get a teams attention is special teams. A guy that can play on every unti and can come in and catch passes could be attractive, but I doubt someone ponies up $2 mil a year for him.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

$18 million is guaranteed a


I'm only seeing $14.6 as guaranteed

You're including a guarantee for injury

If he's cut after 2 years, he gets $14.6m total

$8m signing bonus
2016: 800k
2017: $5.8m
Total: $14.6m
This post was edited on 3/10/16 at 12:15 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 3/10/16 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Highest paid position player not named Brees (off the top of my head). Does that make sense to you?


He's 4th and it's a 5 year deal. If he plays the 5 years, that number at the end will be very low.
This post was edited on 3/10/16 at 12:17 pm
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram