Started By
Message
locked post

Chances Arizona offers 3rd pick of draft for CSP

Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:15 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179947 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:15 am
I'm literally at zero. Maybe .5% chance.

I guess in a vaccum you can say they should do it still. They aren't qb needy and landing the coach is the biggest fish they can argue. 3rd pick would be exreme value for CSP but on the plus side, they wouldn't need to dish out multiple picks for sure at that point.
Posted by RawDog7984
Member since Oct 2019
2404 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:16 am to
There’s also 0% chance saints send him to Arizona without that pick. So if that’s the case then Arizona isn’t an option.
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
26819 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:17 am to
3.50%
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22280 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:17 am to
3rd pick by itself, 0.01% (always a chance).

But I can see the 3rd pick for Payton & Saints 2nd (or 2024 1st).
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
13095 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:17 am to
I mean they could trade the 3rd and we could trade picks as well so it's not like it's black and white just the 3rd pick. With that said, there's no way they trade it with a new coach and GM coming in to take the reign and start fresh with a top pick.
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
12619 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:18 am to
Sean and 2024 1st

No one seems to agree with me, but if we sold on stroud, you do it. 2024 isn't guaranteed to get you a big time qb
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179947 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:19 am to
quote:

There’s also 0% chance saints send him to Arizona without that pick. So if that’s the case then Arizona isn’t an option.


That's not true at all. A base package starting with something this year and combined with next year's first is absolutely an option.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
163149 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:22 am to
Give me that pick, fire Dennis, hire Ben Johnson, draft a QB, I’m back on board
Posted by moock blackjack
Member since Apr 2008
113943 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:26 am to
No shot in hell
Posted by RawDog7984
Member since Oct 2019
2404 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:27 am to
So you’re gonna send Payton and picks to zona for the third pick which isn’t guaranteed one of the top 2 qbs? This is def some tiger droppings thinking. Bears are trading that pick and stroud and young will be gone 1&2 and you’ve given up the coach and the future picks for what? Gruden got 2 firsts and 2 2nds lol. To say zona won’t make the trade isn’t accurate. If Payton is your guy that’s the deal or there is no deal.
Posted by ODP
Conroe
Member since Oct 2015
2040 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:30 am to
K. Murray doesn't seem like a CSP type QB.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179947 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:30 am to
quote:

So you’re gonna send Payton and picks to zona for the third pick which isn’t guaranteed one of the top 2 qbs? This is def some tiger droppings thinking.
you're saying you wouldn't? What in the hell are you saying? Yes, i'd absolutely walk away with a top 3 pick which would guarantee me Will Anderson, Young, or Stroud.
Posted by RawDog7984
Member since Oct 2019
2404 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:34 am to
Of course you would. Cause you’re an idiot. Like i said Young and stroud will be gone by the 3rd pick. So you traded away future assets for a player to go to a team that needs a qb more than anything? And on top of that you’ve traded a future first like some above suggested and still don’t have a qb? This is the stupid thinking that got us here.
Posted by msstate7
Member since Oct 2014
12619 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:37 am to
Then trade the 3rd pick and MT to bears for #1, and get your pick.

Ok, I'm not sure the bears or cardinals would do this, but I'm bored
Posted by RawDog7984
Member since Oct 2019
2404 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:38 am to
Lol ideally this happens but unfortunately the bears hang up on us
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
77182 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:47 am to
quote:

K. Murray doesn't seem like a CSP type QB.


Thats why he teams up with Tom Brady.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
36333 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:50 am to
NFC team = higher compensation needed.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179947 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Of course you would. Cause you’re an idiot. Like i said Young and stroud will be gone by the 3rd pick. So you traded away future assets for a player to go to a team that needs a qb more than anything? And on top of that you’ve traded a future first like some above suggested and still don’t have a qb? This is the stupid thinking that got us here.


You’re taking crazy pills. There’s no trade value better than a 1.3 you’re scoffing at
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
29759 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

But I can see the 3rd pick for Payton & Saints 2nd (or 2024 1st).



Okay, Loomis
Posted by SippyCup
Gulf Coast
Member since Sep 2008
7087 posts
Posted on 1/9/23 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

But I can see the 3rd pick for Payton & Saints 2nd (or 2024 1st).


Hell No!

We are not trading #1s.

The Bears and Cardinals are trading that #1 & #3 to a team that needs a QB.

IF CSP wants AZ, then it's going to cost them.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram