Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Best/Worst things about Garoppolo / Carr being signed in FA

Posted on 2/3/23 at 7:55 pm
Posted by JRE1980
Member since Aug 2020
547 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 7:55 pm
Advantages to signing both, vs disadvantages
Posted by Wardniner01
Member since Dec 2020
2537 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 8:02 pm to
Both cost money the saints don't have. Hell put Thomas at Quarterback he is getting paid enough and can't do much worse than this season .
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
48737 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Best/Worst things about Garoppolo / Carr being signed in FA
Both would be cost concerns IMO.

I'm not sure either are franchise future QBs, so it's either a bridge or win now. I don't see our win now state, outside of a terrible NFC South. I wouldn't spend significant contract on either.
Posted by ElRoos
Member since Nov 2017
7924 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 10:16 pm to
Jimmy G is always injured so he’s basically a waste of money
Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
11566 posts
Posted on 2/3/23 at 11:11 pm to
We need a tank year for the 2024 QBs.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 1:44 am to
Both are losers
Posted by Wardniner01
Member since Dec 2020
2537 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 3:36 am to
quote:

Jimmy G is always injured so he’s basically a waste of money


Works out perfect, our number 1 quarterback can keep our number 1 receiver company on the IR list
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 9:54 am to
quote:

We need a tank year for the 2024 QBs.

We need to make a decision. I don’t believe this roster is built to be elite without elite quarterback play. And you don’t have that and likely won’t get that out of one of those two guys. So throwing money at this isn’t going to fix it.

So do we take our cap licks, purge this roster of bullshite, and get a staff and core group that wants to win?

Probably not. We’ll sign some has been to a stupid contract and then return to perpetual .500 seasons for the foreseeable future
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8813 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 10:35 am to
No advantages. That’s flushing money. If you want average QB play just bring Dalton back for $3 million and save yourself $15-20 million a year.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22271 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 11:25 am to
Pro: they are both good enough that if you have a solid defense, some weapons, and a strong oline; you’ll make the playoffs and may even contend for a SB appearance until the rest of the NFC starts getting quality QBs.

Con: we’ll be seeing more salary cap shenanigans for the next 10+ years, as they continue to go all in and mortgage the future to save the HC & front office their jobs
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
14488 posts
Posted on 2/4/23 at 11:30 am to
Tank and accumulate and push draft picks to the future. New GM and coaching staff.
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
11794 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 1:51 am to
I will be in the minority on this but take a flyer on Hendon Hooker early third round and name him the starter early and hope he swims. At his age, he should be mature enough to handle it, and you are more likely to get a clear picture in a single season of his ability than you would with a kid at 21. Obviously its a homerun if he shows the goods to be worthy of passing on a QB1 in 2024 and if not, he doesn't put you farther into cap hell like signing Garoppolo or Carr would.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10528 posts
Posted on 2/5/23 at 5:21 am to
Best things about Garoppolo being signed in FA

Every team he's been on has gone to the SB


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram