- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Attorney for Smith family / Attorney for Hayes l Press Conference Recap
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:47 pm to NoSaint
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:47 pm to NoSaint
quote:
logistically, if she was behind him how did he end up slumped over the wheel? im just having a hard time picturing the layout and nuts and bolts of it.
i think most of the comments from Smith's attorney were sensationalized. He kinda went that way from the start.
Forensics will be able to get most of the truth.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:47 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
the lawyer claims Will was between the shooter and his wife. Not next to Will.
True. But he also said he shot her first.
quote:
thats cool, because he didnt believe it either
It was a shaky presser at times, I'll admit.
I just want to believe Will's side of the story. But I'm not that stupid until this goes to court and all the facts are straight.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:48 pm to bwallcubfan
quote:
Just being rational.
Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:48 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Question: Were Hayes' guns legal? Don't think ive read that one or another.
last we heard it seemed hayes claimed yes, but the police were having trouble confirming.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:49 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
i think most of the comments from Smith's attorney were sensationalized.
Of course they were. As was Hayes's lawyer.
They are paid to change public perception and steer it in a certain direction.
The facts will emerge. They almost always do.
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:49 pm to NoSaint
quote:plausible theory: He realizes Hayes is shooting so he attempts to retrieve gun from the car to fight back.
logistically, if she was behind him how did he end up slumped over the wheel? im just having a hard time picturing the layout and nuts and bolts of it.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:49 pm to bwallcubfan
quote:
Because you're clearly in Smith's corner. You will argue for Smith until you're blue in the face. They could go to trial, Hayes gets off with 2nd degree and you will continue to defend Smith. I'm just asking you to join me in neutralland. Dang man.
I'm in the corner of the person that shot someone being punished. Sorry not sorry. So far nothing has come out to say I shouldn't be on the victom's side.
quote:
I edited because I wanted to be extremely clear as to what I'm saying. And for the millionth time, I'm not on either side of this. Just being rational.
And look at that, more of you just insulting me. You're not being rational by just dismissing my opinion no matter how many tile shout elk yourself you're being rational.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:50 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
And look at that, more of you just insulting me. You're not being rational by just dismissing my opinion no matter how many tile shout elk yourself you're being rational.
Are you a woman?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:51 pm to bwallcubfan
Are you capable of making a post that doesn't attack me? The answer to both questions appears to be no.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:52 pm to LNCHBOX
You are so dang sensitive, it's hilarious 
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:52 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Very interesting. You completely dismiss anything Will Smith's lawyer says, but are very accepting of Hayes lawyer.
Im not really dismissing it, there just isnt anything new here, given his angle.
Two different situations. Hayes lawyer came out after the shooting, and days later the things he said was backed up by facts.
Smith's lawyer lied against video evidence we already have(Will Smith hit and run), and then omitted anything about Will Smith & his handgun, where there is another eyewitness account that both men mentioned having guns during the confrontation.
What do you think we can actually take from the statement? He wasn't sure of himself, and everything he said was "from my understanding". Then he went and omitted a bunch of details(rightfully so).
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:52 pm to bwallcubfan
And you're incapable of making a point.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:53 pm to Lester Earl
Don't mind LE he stated in a thread that got deleted that he was related to hayes. He's trying to prove his innocence.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:53 pm to Mouth
quote:
True. But he also said he shot her first.
or she simply got hit first. Doesnt mean she was a target.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:53 pm to Mouth
quote:
if she was standing next to Will when Hayes started shooting
Will may have used her as a shield.
He did assault her once in the past that we know of
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:54 pm to LNCHBOX
Made plenty but you just fail to see them. There's another personal attack for you to chew on.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:55 pm to Lester Earl
he did admit that will and his male passenger got out of the car and confronted the 2 men in the hummer and words were exchanged.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:55 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Hayes lawyer came out after the shooting, and days later the things he said was backed up by facts.
dafuq
quote:
Smith's lawyer lied against video evidence we already have(Will Smith hit and run),
No he didn't. There was no hit and run. Please provide evidence affirmatively showing impact. I'll wait.
quote:
then omitted anything about Will Smith & his handgun, where there is another eyewitness account that both men mentioned having guns during the confrontation.
He didn't omit this. He said the handgun was concealed in a compartment. Which seems to, guess what, be backed up with facts.
quote:
What do you think we can actually take from the statement? He wasn't sure of himself, and everything he said was "from my understanding".
From my understanding is lawyer talk.
We are supposed to take from the statement that Racquel was shot first and Smith was shot in the back, and that Smith's gun was in a compartment, not brandished by him.
Simple enough.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:55 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
Will may have used her as a shield.
He did assault her once in the past that we know of
Wait what?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:55 pm to CajunsTigersSaints
quote:
Don't mind LE he stated in a thread that got deleted that he was related to hayes. He's trying to prove his innocence.
Is it supposed to make me mad that you keep saying this?
grhhhh, so pissed!
Popular
Back to top


1



