Started By
Message

re: Attorney for Smith family / Attorney for Hayes l Press Conference Recap

Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:26 pm to
Posted by tigerbytail
slapout
Member since Mar 2016
575 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:26 pm to
He has a idea. Bull shite if the police has a video of Smith with a gun in his hand. Hayes would be out already.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47624 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

where is the police version?


The murder 2 booking is very telling. Might not be what you want, but that is all you are going to get right now.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76527 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

There seems to be two arguments in here: Hayes is guilty lock him up now there is no chance he isn't guilt

Who are all those that said that in such numbers that it makes it the "second argument"?


You over state just a bit don't you think?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:28 pm to
There are three possible arguments

I know Hayes is guilty.


I'm not certain, need more facts

I know Hayes is innocent


I have seen a lot of 1, some of 2, and none of 3
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

The murder 2 booking is very telling. Might not be what you want, but that is all you are going to get right now
So an innocent person has never been booked?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76527 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:30 pm to
Those three are better than just the two you stated earlier.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:31 pm to
Well I didn't list the third because I have seen zero people argue that
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47624 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:31 pm to
Get real. There is so much passive aggressive anti Smith bullshite on this board it could fill the Superdome.

Of course no one will come out in full support of Hayes, but in true message board fashion, trolls will troll and idiots who can hide behind the anonymity of the keyboard will continue to be idiots.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290904 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:31 pm to



You don't say, chick!
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:32 pm to
How is it idiotic to say there is still plenty of questions to be answered to prove this case?
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
147175 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:36 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 7:37 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290904 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:37 pm to




Mordock's timeline is quite interesting. He's adamant that Hayes is innocent
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
47810 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

How is it idiotic to say there is still plenty of questions to be answered to prove this case?


because the video doesnt show a hit and run. how many times do I have to repeat that before I believe it?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47624 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

How is it idiotic to say there is still plenty of questions to be answered to prove this case?


Where did I say this?

I am all about good, rational debate, however this topic has been festering with trolls and dumbasses and it's making that hard to achieve.

The basic 10 page Will Smith thread on ST:
trolling and conspiracy theories by poster A.
Poster B disagrees, pointing to evidence.
Poster A, his alters, and 5 other trolls pile on posted B.
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 7:40 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:39 pm to
He is very adamant. Who is he exactly?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76527 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

He's adamant that Hayes is innocent


Good for him. Seems to have this whole foggy incident wrapped up already!
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:40 pm to
Fun Bunch, can you answer who CJ Murdock is?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111522 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:41 pm to
I mean you are right what he says doesn't matter. But if Fun Bunch says he is a local respected attorney, I will lend my ear to him more than other bullshite being tossed around
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
73769 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

There are three possible arguments


Can't there be a 4th?

quote:

I have seen a lot of 1, some of 2, and none of 3


Kind of hard to make much of a case for 3. So this is actually is very telling of some of the actual facts, that aren't even up for debate. That's still just a ridiculous amount of shots fired, especially into a back.

Also, Lester seems to be actively rooting for Hayes' innocence. So there's that. It's one thing to play devil's advocate, it's another to be completely contradicting and ignorant.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76527 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:41 pm to


This is a Mordock.
Jump to page
Page First 33 34 35 36 37 ... 69
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 35 of 69Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram