- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Attorney for Smith family / Attorney for Hayes l Press Conference Recap
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:26 pm to goatmilker
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:26 pm to goatmilker
He has a idea. Bull shite if the police has a video of Smith with a gun in his hand. Hayes would be out already.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:26 pm to diat150
quote:
where is the police version?
The murder 2 booking is very telling. Might not be what you want, but that is all you are going to get right now.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:27 pm to lsupride87
quote:
There seems to be two arguments in here: Hayes is guilty lock him up now there is no chance he isn't guilt
Who are all those that said that in such numbers that it makes it the "second argument"?
You over state just a bit don't you think?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:28 pm to goatmilker
There are three possible arguments
I know Hayes is guilty.
I'm not certain, need more facts
I know Hayes is innocent
I have seen a lot of 1, some of 2, and none of 3
I know Hayes is guilty.
I'm not certain, need more facts
I know Hayes is innocent
I have seen a lot of 1, some of 2, and none of 3
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:29 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:So an innocent person has never been booked?
The murder 2 booking is very telling. Might not be what you want, but that is all you are going to get right now
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:30 pm to lsupride87
Those three are better than just the two you stated earlier.

Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:31 pm to goatmilker
Well I didn't list the third because I have seen zero people argue that 
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:31 pm to lsupride87
Get real. There is so much passive aggressive anti Smith bullshite on this board it could fill the Superdome.
Of course no one will come out in full support of Hayes, but in true message board fashion, trolls will troll and idiots who can hide behind the anonymity of the keyboard will continue to be idiots.
Of course no one will come out in full support of Hayes, but in true message board fashion, trolls will troll and idiots who can hide behind the anonymity of the keyboard will continue to be idiots.
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:32 pm to Vacherie Saint
How is it idiotic to say there is still plenty of questions to be answered to prove this case?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:36 pm to D011ahbi11
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:37 pm to Lester Earl
Mordock's timeline is quite interesting. He's adamant that Hayes is innocent
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:37 pm to lsupride87
quote:
How is it idiotic to say there is still plenty of questions to be answered to prove this case?
because the video doesnt show a hit and run. how many times do I have to repeat that before I believe it?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:38 pm to lsupride87
quote:
How is it idiotic to say there is still plenty of questions to be answered to prove this case?
Where did I say this?
I am all about good, rational debate, however this topic has been festering with trolls and dumbasses and it's making that hard to achieve.
The basic 10 page Will Smith thread on ST:
trolling and conspiracy theories by poster A.
Poster B disagrees, pointing to evidence.
Poster A, his alters, and 5 other trolls pile on posted B.
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:39 pm to Lester Earl
He is very adamant. Who is he exactly?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:40 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
He's adamant that Hayes is innocent
Good for him. Seems to have this whole foggy incident wrapped up already!
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:40 pm to lsupride87
Fun Bunch, can you answer who CJ Murdock is?
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:41 pm to goatmilker
I mean you are right what he says doesn't matter. But if Fun Bunch says he is a local respected attorney, I will lend my ear to him more than other bullshite being tossed around
Posted on 4/13/16 at 7:41 pm to lsupride87
quote:
There are three possible arguments
Can't there be a 4th?
quote:
I have seen a lot of 1, some of 2, and none of 3
Kind of hard to make much of a case for 3. So this is actually is very telling of some of the actual facts, that aren't even up for debate. That's still just a ridiculous amount of shots fired, especially into a back.
Also, Lester seems to be actively rooting for Hayes' innocence. So there's that. It's one thing to play devil's advocate, it's another to be completely contradicting and ignorant.
Popular
Back to top


0





