re: Attorney for Smith family / Attorney for Hayes l Press Conference Recap

Between both lawyers... this now sounds like an episode of dateline.

It's so open and shut that we've had two press conferences on it in a matter of 6 hours. Great analysis.

How many years should Hayes go to prison for?

quote:

---

It's been 3 days. That's the point

---

I'm not sure what grates you so much about what I'm saying. Some folks are cooking up preposterous scenarios to explain away Hayes's behavior, why aren't you scolding them?

Who has come up with preposterous situations?

And some folks would have Hayes in the electric chair yesterday.

Eta: see post right above this

quote:

---

Life You shoot a man in the back you do life.

---

thats dumb.

I personally haven't seen a crazy scenario for Hayes

There seems to be two arguments in here:

Hayes is guilty lock him up now there is no chance he isn't guilt

And


It is possible it was self defense. Let's let more come out


Apparently being # 2 makes you a crazy nut to Vacherie

quote:

---

What are these crazy scenarios?

---

I'd normally refer you to the search function and tell you to piss off, but I will play.

First, there was the Ceravolo conspiracy, which was debunked by Fuller straight away.

Then we had the "Smith stalked Hayes prior to rear endeding him" (the was Lester Earl on Monday based on the distance between cars closing from the first security camera footage to the last).

Yesterday, it was suggested that Smith had the gun, but dropped it on the floor and crime scene detectives simply didn't see it- explaining away its discovery via search warrant. Credit to gmrkr5 for that gem.

Today, it has been suggested that an officer of the law took Smith's brandished weapon and hid it to protect Smith. This one is the brain child of Zach Lee To Amp Hill.

But I'm being irrational.