- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zion is NOT getting traded.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 8:27 am to Galactic Inquisitor
Posted on 5/19/25 at 8:27 am to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:Yet, you'll see be here every day bitching and acting like you do not care.
Welp, I won't be attending any games this year. We'll see how many I watch, but I'm about 99% done with this franchise. They aren't serious and don't deserve fans.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 8:41 am to higgsBoson
quote:
The smart move is just to keep trying with Zion. Nothing we get back for him will do anything for us in the long term.
Everybody keeps saying it's smart, but it's not paying off. We went into last season as a hopeful playoff team and just sucked. I'd rather watch limited role players that try hard, than a super talented slacker that only tries some of the time. It hasn't been fun and it's beyond frustrating.
I want a rebuild. We just keep kicking the can down the road. What are the real chances that keeping Zion works? Is it 50/50? Better/worse?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 8:44 am to NOSHAU
I do care. I want the team to have a shot at success. That won't happen as long as we keep building around a lazy loser.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:14 am to brmark70816
quote:
I want a rebuild. We just keep kicking the can down the road. What are the real chances that keeping Zion works? Is it 50/50? Better/worse?
It’s not mutually exclusive. We need a rebuild but it’s my belief that trading Zion doesn’t help you rebuild any faster. If he sucks bench him. But in the meantime at least try to increase the value of your number one asset.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:49 am to higgsBoson
Exactly! If Zion stays hurt most of next season, we'll again be tanking for a high pick and accelerating a rebuild. But if Zion has turned a corner on his fitness, then we'll be keeping him and including him as part of our rebuild (and it'll be a shorter rebuild).
Either way, there's no great reason to trade him.
Either way, there's no great reason to trade him.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:48 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
If Zion stays hurt most of next season, we'll again be tanking for a high pick and accelerating a rebuild
Or we'll be tanking for the 6th pick and trying to kick a can full of concrete down the road.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:49 am to Galactic Inquisitor
Y'all realize that Zion is one fairly minor injury away from being a negative asset, don't you?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:51 am to supe12sta12z
Water is wet
Sky is Blue
This is not Baron Davis, Chris Paul, Tony Davis . You are not getting a loot for Zion
Sky is Blue
This is not Baron Davis, Chris Paul, Tony Davis . You are not getting a loot for Zion
Posted on 5/19/25 at 11:09 am to Ghost Of Bristow
quote:
This is not Baron Davis, Chris Paul, Tony Davis . You are not getting a loot for Zion
Right. Trading Zion now for peanuts only means that we end up tanking next season. That's also what happens if he stays hurt all season! Either way, we tank.
The other scenario is that he stays healthy and leads the team to a play-in birth. In which case, maybe we can include him in our long-term plans.
I just don't see a real upside in trading him right now.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 11:26 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
just don't see a real upside in trading him right now
Why can't people just be honest and say that they like him and want to keep him no matter what?
I can understand respect that. We all have favorites. But the value argument is all BS. They never want to sell high or low. We will always be waiting for that peak value to make a move and that's not realistic. We should have done it a long time ago. At least now there is potential still plus an advantageous contract. If he can't perform (like at an all star level for a lot of games), his value takes another hit and he's coming up for an extension next summer. I just want off the roller coaster..
Posted on 5/19/25 at 11:50 am to brmark70816
Why can't you just be honest and engage my actual argument?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 12:57 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Why can't you just be honest and engage my actual argument?
I don't believe in tanking, ever. I would never lose on purpose. I see no value in it (this season just strengthens that belief).
I do believe it's OK to be intentionally bad, if that struggle develops what you have. But I don't think it's necessary to "tank". So I would never advocate for it.
I and many others have proposed tons of Zion trades that return real value. If you believe like me, that Zion will play in limited games, than any serious return will make us better. So I don't accept we get worse by moving him. I just can't believe that. There is also the entire team dynamic and allowing others to flourish. I was never an Ingram fan, but we all know that Zion held him back. What if it's having the same effect on Murphy?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 4:45 pm to supe12sta12z
file this under "no shite, sherlock"
Posted on 5/19/25 at 5:23 pm to brmark70816
quote:
At least now there is potential still plus an advantageous contract. If he can't perform (like at an all star level for a lot of games), his value takes another hit and he's coming up for an extension next summer. I just want off the roller coaster..
I agree with this 100%. Trade Zion. Now. Get 50 cents on the dollar. Get 25 cents on the dollar. I want off this ride. I'm sick of the injury return timetables. You can't build a team around a guy who doesn't play.
Let's say we keep him. And in December he pulls a hamstring that keeps him out for 6-8 weeks. This is imminently possible. Heck, Zion pulling a hamstring is more probable than not. What happens to his trade value? What happens to his value to the team?
Get rid of him now and move forward developing the #7 pick, Trey Murphy, Herb, and whatever prospect we get in return for Zion.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:18 pm to brmark70816
quote:
I was never an Ingram fan, but we all know that Zion held him back. What if it's having the same effect on Murphy?
You think that playing with Zion is holding Murphy back? Unreal, Mark, even for you.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:43 pm to GOP_Tiger
Not responding to anyone in particular here
But I see a lot of Zion has low or no value posts and if we trade him, we’d get 25 cents on the dollar.
I won’t run through every team in the league. But I’ll run through a few that would potentially trade for Zion. And I’ll keep it simple.
Philly Sixers- pick 3 and salary for Zion. Philly has always been a win now team and one willing to push their chips on the table. On our end, Regardless of what people think about Ace Bailey, getting a rookie deal Ace Bailey for a 6 year failure in Zion is actually worth not keeping Zion and getting even less for him when he plays 30 games or less again and/or has more off court drama.
Charlotte Hornets- Pick 4 and Miles Bridges. Same premise. Charlotte would do this to make a big splash and try to not be in the lottery next year.
Utah Jazz- Pick 5 and Walker Kessler and/or John Collins, Utah is another purgatory team that would roll the dice on Zion.
Washington Wizards- Pick 6 and Coulibaly or Bud Carrington. Another Purgatory team starved for a star
Wildcard Spurs. Pick 2 and Devin Vassell for Z and pick 7. Do the Spurs need Dylan Harper with Fox and Castle in the mix?
I feel like 12 other teams would make offers like this as well. I just highlighted ones with high picks in the draft.
Zion is definitely a tradeable piece with value. Did we miss the boat when we didn’t trade him for Hali, Maxey, or Sengun types 2-3 years ago? Yes, but we could still extract value. Pick a rookie and try to develop them into the next up and coming star.
But I see a lot of Zion has low or no value posts and if we trade him, we’d get 25 cents on the dollar.
I won’t run through every team in the league. But I’ll run through a few that would potentially trade for Zion. And I’ll keep it simple.
Philly Sixers- pick 3 and salary for Zion. Philly has always been a win now team and one willing to push their chips on the table. On our end, Regardless of what people think about Ace Bailey, getting a rookie deal Ace Bailey for a 6 year failure in Zion is actually worth not keeping Zion and getting even less for him when he plays 30 games or less again and/or has more off court drama.
Charlotte Hornets- Pick 4 and Miles Bridges. Same premise. Charlotte would do this to make a big splash and try to not be in the lottery next year.
Utah Jazz- Pick 5 and Walker Kessler and/or John Collins, Utah is another purgatory team that would roll the dice on Zion.
Washington Wizards- Pick 6 and Coulibaly or Bud Carrington. Another Purgatory team starved for a star
Wildcard Spurs. Pick 2 and Devin Vassell for Z and pick 7. Do the Spurs need Dylan Harper with Fox and Castle in the mix?
I feel like 12 other teams would make offers like this as well. I just highlighted ones with high picks in the draft.
Zion is definitely a tradeable piece with value. Did we miss the boat when we didn’t trade him for Hali, Maxey, or Sengun types 2-3 years ago? Yes, but we could still extract value. Pick a rookie and try to develop them into the next up and coming star.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 7:44 pm to brmark70816
quote:
r. I just want off the roller coaster..
Roller coaster implies there have been some peaks with Zion. Where can I find these stretches? It’s been all misery.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 8:57 pm to Geauxldilocks
quote:
Roller coaster implies there have been some peaks with Zion. Where can I find these stretches? It’s been all misery.
You got to admit when he made Chris Paul have a hissy fit was pretty funny.
Antonio Daniels is a loser. Get him off our broadcast team.
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 5/20/25 at 8:57 am to supe12sta12z
quote:
Amid no shortage of speculation about the Pelicans deciding to outright shop Williamson for the first time after six frustration-filled seasons, sources say that the lottery assignment was indeed intended to convey the message that New Orleans’ new front office, now headed by Louisiana native Joe Dumars, wants to try again to make things work with Williamson as the team’s centerpiece.”
Translation: the offers received were absolute garbage (probably a pick swap at best).
Posted on 5/20/25 at 12:18 pm to 3PieceSpicy
quote:
Charlotte Hornets- Pick 4 and Miles Bridges. Same premise. Charlotte would do this to make a big splash and try to not be in the lottery next year.
I like the Spurs pick and Vassell more. But I don't think that is something the Spurs would do, plus I'd like to ship Zion east. He has a better chance there, plus it's closer to home for him.
I like Bridges as a player and think he would be a great fit next to Murphy. Good contract too. Plus then we can take Edgecombe or Bailey.
What do you think Brooklyn would give us? They don't need to give us contracts. Could we get #8 plus an additional 1st for Zion?
Popular
Back to top
