- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zach Lowe splashes a little cold water on Pels
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:27 pm to Bronc
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:27 pm to Bronc
quote:
I mean do you really think this new SVG team, one that has already been communicated will not be chasing offense all game and trying to lead the league in pace, without any magical applications of improvement we can’t assume, will be top 5 in threes made AND 7th in efficiency?
3 Pointers Made, probably not because of pacing. I can see players like Lonzo getting similar open looks assuming Zion and Ingram's passing is good enough. That should lead to a decent percentage. Everyone wants shooting/spacing because other teams will be focused on Zion/BI. That means everyone else should be wide open if Zion and BI can get them the ball.
Ingram passed well last season, Zion averaged more turnovers than assists. That's supposed to be one of his skills so for now we can chalk it up to never getting in a rhythm last year, but it's an area of concern that can't be a problem if the offense is going to work.
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:40 pm to Bronc
quote:
giving Moore’s minutes and 400 shots to less efficient shooters
Moore made no difference to the team last year. He played in 56 games last year and took 437 shots. Zion played in 24 games, and took 360.
Why are you assuming it's someone like NAW taking Moore's shots? why can't BI and Zion take more shots?
Zion will obviously be taking a lot more shots this year, assuming he stays healthy.
Jrue took the most shots on the team last year, and Bledsoe will not be taking nearly as many FGA per game that Jrue was. More shots for BI and Zion.
There's generally about 91 shots attempted in an average nba game for us. League average is 89.
BI gets near 20
Zion gets near 20
No one else is taking more than 11 at best. Lonzo, Redick, Bledsoe will be near 11. Hart will be around 8 or 9, Adams maybe 7 or 8, then you'll have a slurry of guys taking minimal shots. In an average NBA game, you're not going to have much more than 7 or 8 guys take shots. That 8th guy might take 2 shots in the game.
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:41 pm to Dantheman504
I agree with that about Bledsoe’s role and Van Gundy, which is why I suspect, barring notable internal growth, both our overall spacing, three point makes, and efficiency is likely to go down. For one you just won’t have the same volume, so for us to be overall better in makes you would need a pretty drastic improvement in efficiency to make up for the reduction in pace. And we also aren’t going to be sacrificing defensive rebounding to get guys like Ingram, Lonzo, and Zion out in transition early. And Bledsoe already doesn’t shoot it much which has been one of my points here. Bledsoe actually shot fewer threes last season than he had in five years. If you are expecting him to reduce that further you are essentially relegating him to near non-shooter status, so how is that a net improvement on our spacing? Now I personally think he is capable of some designed dribble handoffs off screens for a three, but if you are sure the goal is him to basically not do stuff like that at all, or not take shots when the defense sags off, I don’t know how you could conclude spacing improves or where you see us improving overall from three? Since I think defenses will gladly let Adams take 15 footers all day and let Bledsoe shoot at will from the arc, and dare us to beat them that way.
Now maybe SVG produces a very controlled offense where you are efficient on a good bit less shooting, but that doesn’t make you a better spaced or three point shooting team. San Antonio was 4th in efficiency last season, but I would not call them a better spacing and better three point shooting team then we were would you?
Now maybe SVG produces a very controlled offense where you are efficient on a good bit less shooting, but that doesn’t make you a better spaced or three point shooting team. San Antonio was 4th in efficiency last season, but I would not call them a better spacing and better three point shooting team then we were would you?
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:46 pm to Fun Bunch
Adams was a massive win for the team:
A) Paint presence: Get the opposing team to think twice about running into the paint (we had 0 of this presence last year)
B) leadership qualities: his ability to speak so intelligently about the game in interviews and be a commanding personality is great for the team. Usually I don’t mention this about players but you can see it
C) Pick and Roll screens: self explanatory as to why this helps our team
D) He is an asset that will attract other players around the league to consider playing for the Pelicans. Great optics
As far as the cap: You can acquire shooting through trades. Pels have assets that can be used in a trade to get shooting. The obvious place I can see a trade happening is with the following guys: Lonzo, NAW, Hayes and draft picks. That is more than enough to get a good shooter in a trade.
A) Paint presence: Get the opposing team to think twice about running into the paint (we had 0 of this presence last year)
B) leadership qualities: his ability to speak so intelligently about the game in interviews and be a commanding personality is great for the team. Usually I don’t mention this about players but you can see it
C) Pick and Roll screens: self explanatory as to why this helps our team
D) He is an asset that will attract other players around the league to consider playing for the Pelicans. Great optics
As far as the cap: You can acquire shooting through trades. Pels have assets that can be used in a trade to get shooting. The obvious place I can see a trade happening is with the following guys: Lonzo, NAW, Hayes and draft picks. That is more than enough to get a good shooter in a trade.
This post was edited on 12/8/20 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:48 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
Moore made no difference to the team last year. He played in 56 games last year and took 437 shots. Zion played in 24 games, and took 360.
Why are you assuming it's someone like NAW taking Moore's shots? why can't BI and Zion take more shots?
Zion will obviously be taking a lot more shots this year, assuming he stays healthy.
Jrue took the most shots on the team last year, and Bledsoe will not be taking nearly as many FGA per game that Jrue was. More shots for BI and Zion.
There's generally about 91 shots attempted in an average nba game for us. League average is 89.
BI gets near 20
Zion gets near 20
No one else is taking more than 11 at best. Lonzo, Redick, Bledsoe will be near 11. Hart will be around 8 or 9, Adams maybe 7 or 8, then you'll have a slurry of guys taking minimal shots. In an average NBA game, you're not going to have much more than 7 or 8 guys take shots. That 8th guy might take 2 shots in the game.
First off, Moore averaged over one three a game for us, Jrue averaged 2 a game for us.
I’m also not sure how in an argument about spacing and our overall three point prowess as a team, how arguing that Moore’s shots will go to Zion and Ingram, the former who basically doesn’t shoot threes but on a rare occasion, bolsters that argument?
We were what we were last season because Gentry prioritized the three and would sacrifice pretty much anything in pursuit of having that spacing(and as you say, Zion not being there to gobble up shots). Now you and others are telling me how guys that played a role in that will have their shots shifted in part to people that don’t have that as a core competency, and somehow you conclude our spacing and three point shooting will be better? Again, doesn’t really compute
This post was edited on 12/8/20 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:48 pm to Bronc
Well we were originally talking about us being a worse shooting team which I thought you meant percentage. You are talking about volume now right? If we are talking about both then I'd say we can shoot more efficiently this year and be as good or a better shooting team. Let's say we made 500 shots last year and we took 1,000. I think we can still get to 500 shots made but with less shots taken. Yes we may take a few less 3's but honestly if Zion, BI, and Adams play as well as we think they can then I can see the 3pt line opening up a little bit. Once again I don't know how we can become a worse shooting team if we replace Jrue and then spread his shot selection with more efficient scorers.
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:55 pm to Dantheman504
I’ve been referring mostly to jump shots, threes and general spacing. I very much agree that overall efficiency could improve, and hopefully should.
For one reason just the fact we likely will be taking less threes and more shots inside due to Zion’s health.
For one reason just the fact we likely will be taking less threes and more shots inside due to Zion’s health.
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:56 pm to Bronc
I really really don't want to talk bad about Moore but there is a reason he was the leader of our bench players. Yeah you could say good things about that spot but in his case it was because he wasn't a very good starter. Sorry sons.. He played minutes on bad coached teams with 0 depth at SF. Moore would have little minutes on this team so that whole analogy is just stupid. He missed easy shots that other players won't miss going forward. And yes he played SF so his minutes in a way would be going to BI. And also Ingram shoots 3's so I'm not sure what that comment was. Are you saying BI wouldn't take minutes from Moore or that he shouldn't?
This post was edited on 12/8/20 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 12/8/20 at 2:59 pm to Dantheman504
I mean I don’t disagree about the flaws in his overall game, but the ball don’t lie.
Moore averaged over one made three a game for us on better efficiency than the guys that will be replacing him in the lineup.
Then as some have rightly pointed out we expect Zion to be healthy, so shots that were once relegated to lineup fillers in a Gentry system prioritizing spacing are now going to him and less jump shot efficient bench replacements in a SVG system prioritizing defense and ball control. Combine that with trading Jrue for Bledsoe.
Seems pretty obvious to me our spacing and our overall three point shooting is going to take a step back barring internal growth from players.
Moore averaged over one made three a game for us on better efficiency than the guys that will be replacing him in the lineup.
Then as some have rightly pointed out we expect Zion to be healthy, so shots that were once relegated to lineup fillers in a Gentry system prioritizing spacing are now going to him and less jump shot efficient bench replacements in a SVG system prioritizing defense and ball control. Combine that with trading Jrue for Bledsoe.
Seems pretty obvious to me our spacing and our overall three point shooting is going to take a step back barring internal growth from players.
This post was edited on 12/8/20 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:00 pm to Bronc
I don't think we will be taking a lot less 3's. I just think that the 3's we do get will be more open and efficient. I also think BI will take more mid range shots and spacing will improve through that.
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:04 pm to Bronc
quote:
So you are replacing 2000 minutes of a more efficient Jrue for a less efficient Bledsoe.
You got something to go with this or just catch and shoot % on one year?
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:08 pm to bonethug0180
Its almost like Eric Bledsoe can't pass to another player that had a higher efficiency than Jrue
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:15 pm to bonethug0180
quote:
You got something to go with this or just catch and shoot % on one year?
Are you wanting to argue Bledsoe is a better three point shooter and spacer than Jrue, and will lead to us having an equal or better three point shooting season and spacing then last year, go right ahead and show me.
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:18 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
Its almost like Eric Bledsoe can't pass to another player that had a higher efficiency than Jrue
He’ll be passing to the same people Jrue was minus Moore or Kira.
...Jrue is also the better passer FYI
The way some of you all are talking we should have been giving up the house for Bledsoe.
And if he’s passing up all his shots then we get to my point about him shrinking the floor and becoming a non shooter...which I don’t think you are actually suggesting
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:22 pm to Bronc
I'm suggesting that SVG will have our players shooting in the right spots. I'm suggesting Bledsoe won't hurt our 3pt shooting because he won't be the one taking all the 3pt shots.
BI, Lonzo, and JJ all shot better than Jrue from the 3pt line. Chances are at least 1-2 of them will always be in the game with Bledsoe. The 3's Jrue missed will become efficient shots for Bledsoe. The 3's Jrue made will become shots taken my BI, Lonzo, Redick. What don't you understand about that?
BI, Lonzo, and JJ all shot better than Jrue from the 3pt line. Chances are at least 1-2 of them will always be in the game with Bledsoe. The 3's Jrue missed will become efficient shots for Bledsoe. The 3's Jrue made will become shots taken my BI, Lonzo, Redick. What don't you understand about that?
This post was edited on 12/8/20 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:27 pm to Bronc
You are arguing our scoring will get worse because we lost our 4th best 3pt shooter. Hart could even take a step up and shoot at the same clip Jrue shot last year. So what's your point? Bledsoe can do everything else Jrue does and having better players taking 3's helps us not hurts us.
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:31 pm to Dantheman504
If you stopped at efficiency I might hesitantly agree with you, it’s the insistence on claiming our spacing and three point shooting/makes overall will not decrease that is the issue
Again, it doesn’t work like that.
Unless you think Bledsoe will now be a non-shooter, around at least 11 of Jrue’s 15 shots that composed of the 91 shots we took a game last season will go to Bledsoe. And he is likely to at least take three of those a game from three. So we will be taking less threes from our point guard but also hitting them with less frequency. Ingram’s numbers might go up a little to around 20 attempts a game, but Zion’s are also likely to go up to that level as well, and he, barring improvement, does not space. All in a system that is not likely going to take as many shots or have as many shots for our best shooters.
So I just am not able to square how you are making up these differences and saying we will maintain our overall three point output
quote:
BI, Lonzo, and JJ all shot better than Jrue from the 3pt line. Chances are at least 1-2 of them will always be in the game with Bledsoe. The 3's Jrue missed will become efficient shots for Bledsoe. The 3's Jrue made will become shots taken my BI. Lonzo, Redick. What don't you understand about that?
Again, it doesn’t work like that.
Unless you think Bledsoe will now be a non-shooter, around at least 11 of Jrue’s 15 shots that composed of the 91 shots we took a game last season will go to Bledsoe. And he is likely to at least take three of those a game from three. So we will be taking less threes from our point guard but also hitting them with less frequency. Ingram’s numbers might go up a little to around 20 attempts a game, but Zion’s are also likely to go up to that level as well, and he, barring improvement, does not space. All in a system that is not likely going to take as many shots or have as many shots for our best shooters.
So I just am not able to square how you are making up these differences and saying we will maintain our overall three point output
This post was edited on 12/8/20 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:50 pm to Bronc
quote:
Moore averaged over one made three a game for us on better efficiency than the guys that will be replacing him in the lineup.
He wasn't hurt last year at any point.
He didn't play in 16 of the 72 games, and played single digit minutes in 8 more, so you can basically say he played 48 of the 72 games.
He had a pretty terrible season last year. His FG% was significantly lower than usual at 42%, as was his 3P% at 37% His Off and Def ratings were worse than usual, as was his +/-. He appears to be regressing, as most of his numbers over the last 2 years are going down.
I do'nt get why you're using him as someone who played some kind of integral role in our spacing. Even when he shoots really well, he doesn't demand gravity like Redick does. No one is going to stay on Etwaun over helping with Zion down low.
Jrue was an average 3 point shooter. Defenses did not care about him being left open on the 3 point line. Bledsoe sucks at catch and shoot 3's, but it's not like he's a crappy 3 point shooter. He's above average when he's shooting off the dribble. Lonzo is the opposite. He's an above average 3 point shooter when it comes to catch and shoot, and crappy off the dribble.
Saying that, doesn't it make sense to take the ball out of Lonzo's hands in the half court, and put it in Bledsoe's, where both of them are at their best?
Once Zion catches the ball he's shooting quickly more than likely, so if the spacing didn't happen before the catch, it doesn't matter anymore. Same with Adams. the offense pretty much stops once they touch the ball b/c they are shooting it quickly more than likely.
The only other time the ball is being dribbled is when BI has it, and he doesn't need spacing to do what he does late in the shot clock.
Posted on 12/8/20 at 3:59 pm to TeddyPadillac
I didn’t say he was integral, I said he along with the Jrue Bledsoe swap, reallocation of shots back to Zion, and the change in coaching philosophy is all likely to result in a net regression in our spacing and overall three point prowess this season barring internal growth. We can still and likely will be efficient due to SVG’s structure and coaching, but I think you have to go into projections and assumptions about internal growth to conclude on paper we didn’t take a step back....which again, doesn’t mean we will be a worse team, in fact I expect us to be better overall
And I’m still unclear why this is so controversial? It feels a lot like the Wood thread redux lol. Where an obvious statement(on paper, barring internal growth, we got worse in spacing and overall three point shooting due to several factors, or, we would have been better off prioritizing Wood over Melli/Okafor) becomes a flash point for people to bend over backwards to argue
And I’m still unclear why this is so controversial? It feels a lot like the Wood thread redux lol. Where an obvious statement(on paper, barring internal growth, we got worse in spacing and overall three point shooting due to several factors, or, we would have been better off prioritizing Wood over Melli/Okafor) becomes a flash point for people to bend over backwards to argue
This post was edited on 12/8/20 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 12/8/20 at 4:08 pm to Bronc
I think the system change you've brought up is the bigger issue than the personnel changes.
Jrue > Bledose
Moore > Hart
but
Lonzo now > Lonzo before Christmas (that was a painful first 2 months of the season)
NAW > Frank
Josh Hart > Kenrich
Between Lonzo's first 2 months, Kenrich having an equally long shooting slump where they didn't tell him to stop shooting, and Frank getting minutes over Moore, I would say the 3 point shooting "ability" this year vs. last year is probably a wash to maybe even a little better depending on how real Lonzo's shot is. Early Lonzo and the back end of the rotation was really bad.
Jrue > Bledose
Moore > Hart
but
Lonzo now > Lonzo before Christmas (that was a painful first 2 months of the season)
NAW > Frank
Josh Hart > Kenrich
Between Lonzo's first 2 months, Kenrich having an equally long shooting slump where they didn't tell him to stop shooting, and Frank getting minutes over Moore, I would say the 3 point shooting "ability" this year vs. last year is probably a wash to maybe even a little better depending on how real Lonzo's shot is. Early Lonzo and the back end of the rotation was really bad.
Popular
Back to top
