Started By
Message

re: Yeah, that Chandler trade really worked out for us

Posted on 5/3/11 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 12:32 pm to
He's a major injury liability... which is why OKC wouldn't take him in that initial deal...

Of course Chandler healthy is better than Okafor.

But Okafor >>>>>>>>>>>>> 7'0 guy in street clothes.
Posted by IAmTheHatOnMilesHead
Team 31™
Member since Nov 2008
25971 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 12:35 pm to
frick em both...


Bring back RyBeast.
Posted by Port City
Baton Rouge/Shreveport
Member since Jan 2007
3668 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

The thing about that is, this isn't the 1,000,000th thread about Chandler.


Yes it is.

Let's just have one mega thread where people can bitch about JR Smith, Thornton, and Chandler at their leisure without bothering the rest of us.

Posted by Noplacelikehome
Member since Oct 2010
2154 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 2:03 pm to
Tyson has started 465 games in his 9 seasons in the league. Okafor has started 480 games in his 6 year career.

Tyson hasn't played a full season since he has been in the league and Okafor has 3 82 game seasons in his career.

Lets just compare the last 2 seasons Okafor has had with the Hornets and Tyson's last 2 seasons.

Tyson: 125 games (101 starts), 25.3 min per game, 61% fg%, 1.1 blocks per game, 7.8 rpg, 8.3 ppg.

Okafor: 154 games (154 starts), 30.3 mpg, 55% fg%, 1.65 bpg, 9.3 rpg, 10.35 ppg

By the numbers Okafor > Tyson.
This post was edited on 5/3/11 at 2:05 pm
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68772 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

JR Smith, Thornton, and Chandler


Championship.


Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54738 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 5:46 pm to
you didn't bring up "shots altered" or alley oop dunks...
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122663 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 7:28 pm to
Nor did he bring up playoff series played in the fetal position, Emeka 1 Tyson 0.
Posted by Noplacelikehome
Member since Oct 2010
2154 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

Nor did he bring up playoff series played in the fetal position, Emeka 1 Tyson 0.


Look at Tyson's numbers against Dwight Howard in last year's playoffs or the year before against Denver in the playoffs. Those numbers are more "fetal" than Okafor's.

I would have loved to have Tyson in these playoffs to go up against the much larger Lakers but to say that the trade didn't work out for the Hornets based on this series is dumb.
This post was edited on 5/3/11 at 9:38 pm
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122663 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 9:43 pm to
Okafor was average in a throw away in '09-10 and dissapeared when it mattered most in a playoff series, not to mention his abortion of a contract. That trade was and still is another failure of Jeff Bower. It amazes me that Hornets fans are still reaching to defend that idiot.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27834 posts
Posted on 5/3/11 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

I would have loved to have Tyson in these playoffs to go up against the much larger Lakers but to say that the trade didn't work out for the Hornets based on this series is dumb.


Ok, how about that we will pay a just above mediocre center 12-15 million dollars over the next 4 years. That good enough reason to say it was a bad trade ?
Posted by Noplacelikehome
Member since Oct 2010
2154 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 12:33 am to
Yeah no doubt his next few years on his contract are pretty bad, but Tyson actually made more money than Okafor the past 2 seasons. No, in hind sight the Hornets shouldn't have taken his contract, but at least Okafor was in uniform while being paid while Tyson sat the bench bc of injury.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68772 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 7:22 am to
quote:

NIH


You know I can't resist. You and I both thought the trade was a good one when it was made.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476312 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 8:32 am to
the better trade would have been the one to OKC, honestly. we'd likely have cap room to really go after FAs

the okafor deal was good for the short term. saved shinn money and got us a capable 5

but long term? great googily moogily

*ETA: and i know people with good memories will say i was against the OKC trade, but that was a different time. at the time, i was worried about shinn deciding to go cheap and not improve the team. in hindsight, it was worse than we all thought, and we've all become desensitized to the financial problems. at the time, we all thought that this team could sustain its current payroll to stay elite.
This post was edited on 5/4/11 at 8:38 am
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68772 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 8:44 am to
quote:

the better trade would have been the one to OKC, honestly. we'd likely have cap room to really go after FAs


I agree. Unfortunately, well . . . shite happens.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 8:51 am to
quote:

the better trade would have been the one to OKC, honestly


No it wouldn't have.

quote:

in hindsight, it was worse than we all thought


Looking over the 2009 free agents it wasn't pretty. LINK Bower probably would have thrown the full MLE at Zaza Pachulia.
This post was edited on 5/4/11 at 8:59 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476312 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 9:18 am to
quote:

No it wouldn't have.

we'd have cap room to go after either marc gasol or chandler to play the 5 this offseason

quote:

Looking over the 2009 free agents it wasn't pretty. LINK Bower probably would have thrown the full MLE at Zaza Pachulia.

we wouldn't have had the cap room to sign anybody i don't think. this offseason would have led to the potential bounty, with peja's deal coming off the books. remember a year ago we were burdoned by the contracts of paul, west, peja, wright, and posey. those contracts alone meant no FA
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 9:34 am to
quote:

or chandler to play the 5 this offseason




We'd have the cap space to undo the Shinn/Bower mistake by siging Chandler.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476312 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 9:37 am to
well with a new CBA, i doubt chandler will be on the market for $10M/year

so we get a rejuvenated tyson for less money/years

i'd much, much rather marc gasol
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 9:45 am to
quote:

i'd much, much rather marc gasol



Not happening I don't think. Randolph extended because he was told they were keeping Gasol, and the way they've played has made Rudy expendable if you had to choose between Rudy and Gasol. I still think Mayo is the odd man out, but what I've seen out of the Grizzlies recently makes me think Gasol isn't going anywhere.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476312 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 9:49 am to
if not gasol, we could have used our space to try and trade for an expensive piece another team didn't want

like gay in your example

or randolph, when the grizz got him

as is, the hornets are basically fricked. trading chandler to OKC gave the hornets a chance to get lucky and become elite
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram