Started By
Message

re: Who would the Pels have picked at 10 if the Memphis Trade didn't happen?

Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:24 am to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278625 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Zion's 3pt numbers aren't impressive, Zion's FT efficiency isn't impressive...but Zion's TS% is elite



Ok, you are getting close, but using the wrong words.


“Aren’t impressive” = how about non existent? 4% of his FG attempts are 3pters.

And his FT volume + makes is rewarding in this metric.

He takes a lot of safe shots; and is really good at it. He gets to the line a bunch & hits slight below league average = win. His efficiency rankings will always be strong
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278625 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:26 am to
quote:

you said Zion takes 92% of his shots at the rim


No, I said 92% of his shots near the rim.

0-3ft = at rim
3-10 ft= in the lane
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111105 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Ok, you are getting close, but using the wrong words.


“Aren’t impressive” = how about non existent? 4% of his FG attempts are 3pters.

And his FT volume + makes is rewarding in this metric.

He takes a lot of safe shots; and is really good at it. He gets to the line a bunch & hits slight below league average = win. His efficiency rankings will always be strong
So why is he an elite volume scorer if the thing he does more than anyone else(though you argue he doesn't, and you're wrong but that's beside the point), he's just average at?


Why can't you answer that question?
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278625 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:28 am to
quote:

What exercise do you think this we're running here?


You think a 29G sample size is affecting his volume compared to the rest of the people on this list. You tell me.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111105 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:29 am to
quote:

You think a 29G sample size is affecting his volume compared to the rest of the people on this list. You tell me.

You think changing the sample size is going to change the fact that Zion is elite at the rim due to volume?

You think if he played 60 games, he'd magically not still have really high volume of shots taken at the rim?


Man, just stop.
This post was edited on 3/27/23 at 11:30 am
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278625 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:31 am to
quote:

he's just average at?


Your words, not mine

Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111105 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:33 am to
You're still missing the point and just ignoring it.


Tell me more about how Zion doesn't have extraordinary rim volume while you posted a graphic that shows Zion takes the most shots at the rim per game.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278625 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:34 am to
quote:

You think if he played 60 games, he'd magically not still have really high volume of shots taken at the rim?


Huh

But it’s not. It’s 29G worth


I’m not sure what you are applying that too.


Isn’t your argument that his efficiency is tainted because of the volume?

Help me understand
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111105 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:35 am to
It's cool, you think that guy who averages the most shots in the rim per game doesn't have "extraordinary" rim volume.

It's fine. You can keep on thinking that. No biggie.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278625 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:37 am to



Ok, I’m not going crazy.

That was your point.

Glad that is out of the way.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111105 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:38 am to
Thanks for proving my point again, that you confirmed you do indeed want to ignore frequency of shots at the rim.


Not sure why you thought that proved your point when that was my entire premise from my very 1st post. But appreciate you proving my point just a bit more for me.


Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278625 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:40 am to
quote:

you think that guy who averages the most shots in the rim per game doesn't have "extraordinary" rim volume.


Again, Not relevant at all in this application.

I know Zion takes a lot of shots near the rim. I literally did the math for you.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278625 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Thanks for proving my point again, that you confirmed you do indeed want to ignore frequency of shots at the rim.



Again, I literally showed you the math on it. I even toggled the table chart to fit him in on the graphic. He is 24th amongst his league mates on shots at the rim.

Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14943 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 12:26 pm to
I think they probably still would have picked Trey.

Going back I can't find my final big board for that year, but the one I could find I had Moody at 7 and Sengun at 9. I came onto Duarte as well.
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
6266 posts
Posted on 3/27/23 at 2:55 pm to
Jokic is obviously on another level. That being said, in 3 of his 8 seasons, Sengun’s % was better than his from that distance.

I still contend 51% on high volume as a 20 year old is elite. It took Sabonis basically 6-7 years to match that on his end.

Another point. As bad as Sengun is on defense at this point, he blocks more shots than Jokic and Sabonis. I know that’s not the end all, be all defensive stat, but it suggests his defensive upside could exist as he progresses and learns the subtleties of defending the pick and roll.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram