- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What leaks do you think we hear today?
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:53 am to PelsForLife
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:53 am to PelsForLife
Turner is a stretch rim protector, that's exactly what you need with guys like Zion and Ingram.
I don't like all the rumors of stinginess I'm hearing from the Boston side of things.
Ingram/Turner/Picks > Tatum/Filler/Picks
I don't like all the rumors of stinginess I'm hearing from the Boston side of things.
Ingram/Turner/Picks > Tatum/Filler/Picks
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:53 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Is that really a concern for us at this point? Do we care about space this year?
I think Griffin would MUCH prefer more assets than space.
I would much prefer assets, than space. I don't really know who would the Pels really want that they could possibly land, outside of maybe a Brogdon.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:53 am to hsfolk
quote:
Something like 4, Hart, and Solo for 8, 17, and next years Nets first would make a ton of sense to me I'd I was Griff
Mac's suggestion
ETA: Seems steep to me to move up 4 spots but I'd take that for sure.
This post was edited on 6/13/19 at 10:55 am
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:54 am to hsfolk
I'd want a throw in like bembry and/or 17
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:55 am to ShamelessPel
quote:
New York isn’t offering us #3 and talent, so you know they wouldn’t have offered #1.
NY not offering #3 is bullshite, they just aren't and never were really in the running unless they acquired better assets.
quote:
We’re basically getting lowballed by the Lakers because they know that RP and Davis are trying to force their way there.
LA is offering everything they can, we're just meh on the offer.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:55 am to NOSHAU
quote:
Care to explain?
This is Solos LAST year. Why would you move down in the draft to dump one year of salary?
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:55 am to SLafourche07
quote:I would take that.
quote:
Something like 4, Hart, and Solo for 8, 17, and next years Nets first would make a ton of sense to me I'd I was Griff
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:55 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Is that really a concern for us at this point? Do we care about space this year?
MM has talked about using the space to get the solid vets Griffin wants. But all I see is a ton of Max salary slots and hardly any Max players on the move meaning too much cash chasing too little talent. I think quite a bit of the FA market this summer is going to get Mozgoved. I would not be wanting to lock down long term steady vet help in that environment.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:56 am to Saintsisit
quote:If by doing so, you could create enough space to sign someone like Brogdon, does that have no value?
This is Solos LAST year. Why would you move down in the draft to dump one year of salary?
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:56 am to TigerinATL
quote:
I think quite a bit of the FA market this summer is going to get Mozgoved.
Yeah I have grave concerns that this year's FA will be shades of the cap explosion year.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:57 am to SLafourche07
So:
NOP: Ingram/Ball/Kuzma/8/17/Nets 1st
ATL: 4/Solo/Hart
LAL: Asset #1
NOP: Ingram/Ball/Kuzma/8/17/Nets 1st
ATL: 4/Solo/Hart
LAL: Asset #1
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:57 am to NOSHAU
quote:
NOSHAU
you know NO can just buyout his contract?
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:58 am to LosLobos111
Never mind, saw the original comment lol
This post was edited on 6/13/19 at 11:00 am
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:59 am to NOSHAU
Do you not see that the #4 is a secured asset while landing a big free agent is not guaranteed? Why do you think Griffin is trying to get an All Star caliber player in a trade using #4?
Where does this logic comes from thinking that creating cap space is the answers everything? The Lakers, Knicks, Nets, and Mavs have been doing it for years and it has gotten them nowhere.
Where does this logic comes from thinking that creating cap space is the answers everything? The Lakers, Knicks, Nets, and Mavs have been doing it for years and it has gotten them nowhere.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 10:59 am to LosLobos111
quote:
So:
NOP: Ingram/Ball/Kuzma/8/17/Nets 1st
ATL: 4/Solo/Hart
LAL: Asset #1
Yes, or his suggestion is let them keep Kuzma in exchange for more future picks. LAL 20,22,24 1sts.
And I would do that as well.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 11:01 am to SLafourche07
They can have Kuzma. Give me the picks
Posted on 6/13/19 at 11:01 am to SLafourche07
Who would we target in free agency if we go after Turner? Maybe Rubio would be good fit with that lineup.
Rubio, Jrue, Ingram, Zion, Turner
Rubio, Jrue, Ingram, Zion, Turner
Posted on 6/13/19 at 11:01 am to LosLobos111
He then says to take Goga and Okeke with those picks. That is awful value for those picks.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 11:01 am to SLafourche07
So:
NOP: Ingram/Ball/8/17/Nets20/LAL20/LAL22/LAL24
ATL: 4/Solo/Hart
LAL: AD
That's a take. IMO.
NOP: Ingram/Ball/8/17/Nets20/LAL20/LAL22/LAL24
ATL: 4/Solo/Hart
LAL: AD
That's a take. IMO.
Posted on 6/13/19 at 11:01 am to hsfolk
quote:Yes, and I know that costs cash and cap space. A trade like detailed above could open up probably $30-$35 million in cap space if they renounce their FAs.
you know NO can just buyout his contract?
Popular
Back to top



1



