- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The SKC is about to start falling apart
Posted on 9/5/24 at 10:02 pm to ghost2most
Posted on 9/5/24 at 10:02 pm to ghost2most
New Orleans would lose a lot of big events if they lost their professional teams. Super Bowl is one
Posted on 9/6/24 at 10:02 am to shel311
quote:
But we've had a 2nd round team
Yeah, the year Boogie tore his Achilles, and the year they were fully prepared to pay the tax until that happened.
quote:
we've had a 49 win team,
Yeah, last season… were paying the tax this season to keep that team…
Posted on 9/6/24 at 12:31 pm to Soggymoss
I don't understand how people view teams as passion projects, where an owner is supposed to spend lavishly (recklessly) and operate at a loss. It is a business, it should be profitable.
I just read an article about going into the luxury tax and how she would have to sell off pieces of the team to fund it (to get cash). PE firms are targeting teams as investments. I would just hate to see that happen.
I just read an article about going into the luxury tax and how she would have to sell off pieces of the team to fund it (to get cash). PE firms are targeting teams as investments. I would just hate to see that happen.
Posted on 9/6/24 at 3:12 pm to brmark70816
quote:I would like to read that. Can you provide link? Seems a bit far fetched.
I just read an article about going into the luxury tax and how she would have to sell off pieces of the team to fund it (to get cash).
Posted on 9/6/24 at 4:48 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
would like to read that. Can you provide link? Seems a bit far fetched.
LINK
From the article..
"The Bensons bought the team for $338 million. It is now worth over $1.6 billion. Investment groups do not pay premiums for non-controlling, silent stakes. Still, selling a 5% stake would likely fetch between $65-$80 million, according to several league sources familiar with these investments.
Granted, this money would not all go towards roster upgrades and luxury tax bills, but it would signal the fans that everything is being done to build a winning team. Someone willing to pay the luxury tax to ensure deep playoff runs for a few years."
Posted on 9/6/24 at 6:38 pm to brmark70816
quote:
The Bensons bought the team for $338 million. It is now worth over $1.6 billion.
This is out of date. The Forbes list has them at $2.5 Billion now. I’m not sure when it was updated though because I’m pretty sure I remember a $1.5ish figure last October when it came out.
LINK
Posted on 9/6/24 at 8:11 pm to TigerinATL
The article is a little over a year ago, after last offseason. I'm sure they could get over 2B in a sale, unless they were somehow obligated to keep the team in the area.
I know that Simmons stated that the league was trying to push the Celtics sale price to 5 or 6B (a team that doesn't own its arena). That way the expansion fees would be higher, when the league expanded, hence bigger cuts for the owners. I'm sure they do not want the Pelicans to come up for sale for awhile, which might undercut them. Otherwise, it would be cheaper to buy/move the Pelicans, rather than start an expansion team (possibly half as much)..
I know that Simmons stated that the league was trying to push the Celtics sale price to 5 or 6B (a team that doesn't own its arena). That way the expansion fees would be higher, when the league expanded, hence bigger cuts for the owners. I'm sure they do not want the Pelicans to come up for sale for awhile, which might undercut them. Otherwise, it would be cheaper to buy/move the Pelicans, rather than start an expansion team (possibly half as much)..
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:12 pm to brmark70816
quote:Did I miss it? I did not read where it said she would have to sell off assets in order to be able to raise the cash to pay the luxury tax.
LINK
From the article..
"The Bensons bought the team for $338 million. It is now worth over $1.6 billion. Investment groups do not pay premiums for non-controlling, silent stakes. Still, selling a 5% stake would likely fetch between $65-$80 million, according to several league sources familiar with these investments.
Granted, this money would not all go towards roster upgrades and luxury tax bills, but it would signal the fans that everything is being done to build a winning team. Someone willing to pay the luxury tax to ensure deep playoff runs for a few years."
This post was edited on 9/6/24 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 9/6/24 at 11:18 pm to NOSHAU
Someone who restructures contracts and gives large signing bonuses have the cash to sign checks. It's bs made up stories.
Posted on 9/7/24 at 6:15 am to NOSHAU
quote:
Did I miss it? I did not read where it said she would have to sell off assets in order to be able to raise the cash to pay the luxury
Do you believe that the team has reserves that could cover additional costs? The team does not generate a ton of cash, in comparison to other teams. The most recent figure I saw for total revenue was 262M, which is well below league average. The players receive over 60% of the pie, operating costs are not cheap. Then people want her to build new facilities, enlarge payroll, fund an arena, and get the best staff. I don't see how all of that is viable. The money has to come from the team somehow..
Posted on 9/7/24 at 9:42 am to brmark70816
quote:Do you think large corporations run only on cash sitting in their drawers? If she needed cash, do you not think she would qualify for a line of credit? It is silly to think that she is so cash poor that she would have to start selling off assets to pay a luxury tax bill. That is an odd assumption.
Do you believe that the team has reserves that could cover additional costs? The team does not generate a ton of cash, in comparison to other teams. The most recent figure I saw for total revenue was 262M, which is well below league average. The players receive over 60% of the pie, operating costs are not cheap. Then people want her to build new facilities, enlarge payroll, fund an arena, and get the best staff. I don't see how all of that is viable. The money has to come from the team somehow..
This post was edited on 9/7/24 at 9:43 am
Posted on 9/7/24 at 9:44 am to htran90
quote:Exactly, some of the signing bonuses given the NFL players are more than a potential luxury tax bill for one season in the NBA.
Someone who restructures contracts and gives large signing bonuses have the cash to sign checks. It's bs made up stories.
Posted on 9/7/24 at 12:12 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
Do you think large corporations run only on cash sitting in their drawers?
I believe that they are budgeted and only make moves that generate more revenue. I am sure that the team has cash on hand/reserves.
quote:
If she needed cash, do you not think she would qualify for a line of credit?
I'm sure people are lining up to lend the team cash, even at rates well below market. But I don't think they would take on any debt, that isn't short-term. Unless it is part of a larger plan, like a capital construction project that takes multiple years.
quote:
It is silly to think that she is so cash poor that she would have to start selling off assets to pay a luxury tax bill. That is an odd assumption.
I don't spend others people money or demand how they should allocate. If we want her to spend, the team needs to make more money. Or people need to exhibit how spending this money will generate greater results. If we go above the tax lime by 5M, we lose the bonus for being below (someone said it was 15M) plus whatever the tax penalty. Can you or any guarantee that extra 20-22M is going to result in more succes? That's a lot of money, even for a billionaire.
This is the reality for how small market teams, with responsible owners operate. Even the Warriors are smarting up and changing their model. They make almost triple the revenue of the Pelicans and are scaling back. There is definitely a time to gamble, to go for it. This team, right now, isn't that time..
Posted on 9/7/24 at 11:25 pm to brmark70816
quote:I can see that as a legitimate stance. However, your claim that in order to pay the luxury tax, Gayle would have to sell off assets is what I completely disagree with and it is far from accurate.
There is definitely a time to gamble, to go for it. This team, right now, isn't that time..
This post was edited on 9/7/24 at 11:28 pm
Posted on 9/8/24 at 5:34 am to NOSHAU
quote:
However, your claim that in order to pay the luxury tax, Gayle would have to sell off assets is what I completely disagree with and it is far from accurate.
You and I obviously view a business in different ways. Yes, she has wealth and money. But that is separate from the team and how it is financed. The money would/should come from the organization. There are many ways that she can generate additional funds. Selling off shares is a primary source and a very common practice..
Posted on 9/8/24 at 3:59 pm to brmark70816
quote:What were the Pelicans net profits last season?
I don't spend others people money or demand how they should allocate. If we want her to spend, the team needs to make more money
And what were they yearly over the last few seasons?
Posted on 9/8/24 at 4:01 pm to brmark70816
quote:Is it for NBA owners who own 100% of a team?
Selling off shares is a primary source and a very common practice..
Can you provide examples and where I can read up on that?
Posted on 9/8/24 at 4:36 pm to brmark70816
quote:Which owners have sold off parts of their teams to pay the luxury tax?
Selling off shares is a primary source and a very common practice..
Posted on 9/8/24 at 4:38 pm to shel311
quote:
What were the Pelicans net profits last season?
This is not disclosed by teams, they have an operating income online that adds up to around 400 million for the past 12 years since the Bensons purchased the team, but again that is not profits as operating income only includes what’s left after what it costs to run the team itself. It doesn’t include projects like building practice facilities, taxes, stadium expenses etc. If I had to give a rough estimate I would say the Pelicans average probably around 10-15 million a year in actual profits, and that is including the luxury tax payouts they have been receiving, which without those the team is likely losing money even if they don’t pay the tax.
This post was edited on 9/8/24 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 9/8/24 at 8:49 pm to Soggymoss
quote:So brmark saying the Pels need to make more to expect Benson to spend more is just completely made up...
This is not disclosed by teams
Popular
Back to top



0



