- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ScoopB: Pels will be active in FA market for vet Center
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:23 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:23 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
An old friend of ours just insinuated that Joe has a comedic trade lined up
and he's been pretty accurate as of late, so unfortunately waiting to see what it is.
1
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:25 pm to AD23
Unfortunately he has been. He's been relatively accurate on "small" stuff going back a long time.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:29 pm to Fun Bunch
If its comedic then it would have to either make no sense or be someone who was on our team right? Are we trading for Val?
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:30 pm to Dantheman504
Or someone very minor that they try to pretend is some great pick up and we have to move a guy for it to work
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:34 pm to Fun Bunch
There's not many "very minor" people we would have to move contracts for. Only one that would be a high cost but good player would be John Collins. I don't think there's anyone who makes enough money that we would need to trade Jose/ Hawk that would be worse than having them.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:39 pm to Dantheman504
The only thing funnier than Jaxson Hayes would be trading our 27' pick to the Hawks for Onyeka Okongwu. HAHAHA
This post was edited on 6/30/25 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:40 pm to Dantheman504
We can't trade 27 because of the Stepien Rule
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:46 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
We can't trade 27 because of the Stepien Rule
Not if they give us a late 26' pick. Now that would be hilarious!
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:53 pm to Dantheman504
Bunch, where are you seeing this out of curiosity? Only thing I saw on X didn’t say anything about a trade and more seemed like a joke. Just curious.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:55 pm to PELsu
I could have misinterpreted it but he said 'wait until you see what joe has cooked up LOL" or something to that effect and then "not necessarily a signing"
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:57 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
could have misinterpreted it but he said 'wait until you see what joe has cooked up LOL" or something to that effect and then "not necessarily a signing
How would you interpret this "LOL" while knowing the source? Is that a "we are fricked" lol or a "this will be interesting" lol?
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:57 pm to Fun Bunch
Sounds like attention whoring.
Posted on 6/30/25 at 1:59 pm to Dantheman504
would interpret it as it's a dumb move
Posted on 6/30/25 at 2:41 pm to Dantheman504
quote:If we use the TPE, it will still count against the tax. So, you cannot add the $10 million plus the TPE. The max we can take on (without a trade) is roughly $10 million. With a trade, we would have to find someone to take on the 3 guys you mentioned, but also replace their roster spots, so the net of the 3 would be in the $5-$6 million range if we replaced them with players making minimum.
So $10 mil below the tax. $14mil exception, and $11mil between Jose/ Hawk, Reeves. Do the math and I was correct with being able to add $25-$30mil in assets....
Posted on 6/30/25 at 6:41 pm to Don Pel
quote:
I can see Looney being the play
What I say wrong? Lol
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News