- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Orleans Pelicans are willing to part ways with Brandon Ingram in hopes of getting Dame
Posted on 6/28/21 at 5:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/28/21 at 5:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
my protests in this thread are giving up BI + young player + multiple 1st rounder/draft capital. that's too much
Agreed
Posted on 6/28/21 at 5:09 pm to BilJ
quote:
I heard Kushner on the radio advocating giving up Ingram plus basically every single asset we have. Seemed a tad high there breh
Heard this and rolled my eyes. He’s generally clueless
Posted on 6/28/21 at 5:41 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
You're definitely dealing BI.
The best most feasible option is trading BI and keeping NAW and Jax. Trade Kira and 10 to them so they have younger pieces to help tank while BI puts up Beal numbers.
I agree. If it happens, then it's going to take BI, Bledsoe, Kira, #10, and several more 1sts and swaps. That's the best offer that Portland is going to get.
Then, we have to make another deal to bring in another top-50 player. We empty the cupboard and put up another three or so firsts to get a player of the caliber of Brogdon (who will probably not be available, but a comparable player will).
As I said, I don't think that Dame is willing to come here unless we make this deal for this player (whoever he is). Earlier, I speculated that we could just give POR this player instead of BI, but a big part of BI's value is that he's locked in for four more seasons, and I don't know that this mystery player is good enough to get that done.
Then what happens is that we bring in a quality player with the MLE and re-sign Lonzo and Hart, and we go win a title. If Lillard actually becomes available, I will be honestly surprised if we don't get him.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:31 pm to Bronc
quote:Listened to a couple of podcasts today, Bill Simmons, Ryen Russillo, and Zach Lowe on 2 different pods all were in agreement that Portland wouldn't just send him to any team, and that Dame would have a say in where they'd trade him to.
Y’all keep trying to say this but it ain’t true in this situation.
4 year contract and aged 30.
Portland has zero incentive to give him his preferred landing spot and artificially handicap themselves.
Those dudes, especially Lowe, are really plugged in and understand how front offices operate.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:34 pm to shel311
quote:
Listened to a couple of podcasts today, Bill Simmons, Ryen Russillo, and Zach Lowe on 2 different pods all were in agreement that Portland wouldn't just send him to any team, and that Dame would have a say in where they'd trade him to.
Literally just finished listening to Simmons and Russillo and that's not what they said.
Said exactly what I said in that the situation is materially different because Dame has 4 years on his contract. Portland can tell him to take a hike.
Russillo started out echoing the sentiment Lillard can tell them he doesn't want to play in NOLA, then they immediately started doing the logic and realized Lillard, like I said, has 4 years left and while Lillard can play hardball, hope his agent can work magic, ultimately Portland has no incentive or need to send him where he wants.
Though they also went on to mention what I and TigerATL(in more depth on the rationale) said, which is that Philly will have a strong leg up, is there favorite to land him, because they can offer Simmons, Maxey, loads of picks. Speculated Boston offering Jaylen Brown(Simmons hates the idea). And that is going to make the market for Lillard on our end expensive.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:38 pm to shel311
quote:
Those dudes, especially Lowe, are really plugged in and understand how front offices operate.
Precisely, front offices who screw players (especially star ones who have dedicated themselves to a team for a decade) will get ruined.
Realistically, the contenders I think he tries to go to that doesn't require them to gut a core and will contend:
Philly - Ben Simmons
Miami - Tyler Herro
Boston - Jaylen Brown
Denver - Michael Porter Jr
LA Clippers - Paul George
GSW - Wiseman, Wiggins
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:45 pm to Bronc
Is Simmons + Maxey really a better combo than BI + Kira? Obviously, before the playoffs, I would have said yes, but I don't know now.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:48 pm to htran90
quote:
Precisely, front offices who screw players (especially star ones who have dedicated themselves to a team for a decade) will get ruined.
Portland aint attracting any superstar free agents or they would have already done so.
There is no pressure to frick over the future of the organization, especially when there is rumors of them selling it, by handicapping their own return on a Lillard trade.
Everyone is going to work in their best interest, and Portland's best interest is to 1.) try and keep Lillard, if that fails 2.) to maximize their return for him.
Not to mention the precedent they would be setting, which would be that any superstar they get int he future can just handpick and decide when they want to up and leave.
On a personal note, are you just wanting the Pels to be shite forever? Because here's the rub, no player right now is going to put us on their list, it will be us taking the chance on a prove it basis. And if we aren't willing to do that then we might as well cash in our chips for cash because it was fricking pointless to amass a warchest. You amass a archest as a small market specifically because you want to have the ammo to take your shot when the opportunity arises. Griff has said that is in fact his strategy.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:49 pm to GOP_Tiger
I feel like Simmons has negative value due to his contract and utter meltdown.
He is not only a headcase but apparently is hated.
And klutch…
He is not only a headcase but apparently is hated.
And klutch…
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:51 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Is Simmons + Maxey really a better combo than BI + Kira? Obviously, before the playoffs, I would have said yes, but I don't know now.
If that is the deal, I'd say it's a toss up on what direction Portland wants to go, but I'd take BI.
But my point there was more about the price range it probably puts us in because Philly will offer Simmons and shite load of picks, and that sort of removes the ability for us to leave out Ingram in any potential deal IMO.
Which I would try my hardest to do(but is probably impossible until Hayes/NAW/Kira really develop some more)
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:52 pm to Bronc
quote:
Said exactly what I said
Simmons asked specifically about New Orleans, and Russillo said he's not going there then explained and it was obvious the answer was because Dame wouldn't want to go there.
He then on to explain the Dame situation and all the years left, and Russillo said, "That may change it a little bit." And he didn't exactly say that with a lot of conviction. He was basically acknowledging it and saying it could play a small factor but he thought Dame will have a say in where he goes.
It was extremely obvious reading between the lines and the direct quotes especially with Russillo that he was saying Dame would definitely have a say, and Portland would listen. The only out was him saying it may change the situation a "little bit" which is a really far, far cry from them saying "exactly what you said" and honestly it was basically just about the exact opposite of what you've been saying.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:54 pm to htran90
quote:Pretty much what Zach Lowe said. Just said it's not a good look, and basically you don't want that stain on your organization.
Precisely, front offices who screw players (especially star ones who have dedicated themselves to a team for a decade) will get ruined.
And that dude is about as unbiased as it gets and knows more about the inner workings of front offices than all of us posting here combined.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 7:55 pm to shel311
quote:
It was extremely obvious reading between the lines and the direct quotes especially with Russillo that he was saying Dame would definitely have a say, and Portland would listen.
You can interpret it however you want, I didn't interpret it that way and don't think an attempt at objectivity would either, fact is Portland has no incentive to frick themselves over. Whether two podcasters and hot take artists shooting from the hip can grasp that or not(and by my account they both did).
And as a franchise we better fricking hope that is the sentiment otherwise the warchest strategy is literally pointless, because if not even a 4 year contract superstar can be had with overpays by small markets, this era is fricked, the competitive balance of the league is fricked, and we might as well sell Zion now.
However, rational self-interest and the history of human kind and capitalism tells me the idea a billion dollar organization would actively torpedo themselves and their value when it is unnecessary to do so, on the premise of vague "goodwill," flies in the face of all business, sports, or human logic.
Guarantee Portland would tell Lillard to kick rocks if the Pels came with a godfather offer that surpassed any of the teams he listed out.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 6/28/21 at 8:14 pm to Bronc
quote:He directly said Dame's contract length may change it a little bit. Why would anyone objectively think that is remotely the same as what you've been saying? It's not, not even close.
You can interpret it however you want, I didn't interpret it that way and don't think an attempt at objectivity would either,
quote:And Zach Lowe, who isn't know for shooting at the hip? Can he just not grasp it either?
Whether two podcasters and hot take artists shooting from the hip can grasp that or not
Posted on 6/28/21 at 9:07 pm to shel311
quote:
He directly said Dame's contract length may change it a little bit. Why would anyone objectively think that is remotely the same as what you've been saying? It's not, not even close.
More or less I find it amusing people are wanting to win internet arguments so bad they are evoking Bill Simmons as expert witnesses. Even when the second part of that conversation evoked the notion Zion may refuse to sign his rookie extension.
Which, if you want to really transcript it, at no point did Simmons sign onto Russillos hot taking on that point. And Russillo’s response came off more like “I didn’t realize that” and now I’m realizing it. As in real time you can hear him go from “he’ll refuse” to beginning to process the context of Lillards situation as he starts realizing, and saying out loud the years and money and then his brain wanders off and he starts talking about a rookie asking out like Zion and a player refusing to play after a full contract but never does he explain why that would happen and work out in his favor. Just that a Lillard type situation will happen eventually, then they move to Philly as the star partner.
So no, your framing isn’t really correct.
Like most Simmons podcasts they are just shooting from the cuff and don’t really do research. It’s empty brain entertainment.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 6/28/21 at 9:13 pm to Bronc
quote:You've had 2 or 3 dudes that all you out for your posts in just the last day or so, so I'll add 1 more. Remember just maybe 2 days ago when I mentioned you were always the common denominator? You've proved that and then some these past 24 or so hours lol. I've seen multiple dudes calling you out.
More or less I find it amusing people are wanting to win internet arguments
quote:It was exactly what happened, with direct quotes
So no, your framing isn’t really correct.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 9:16 pm to shel311
quote:
Russillo said he's not going there then explained and it was obvious the answer was because Dame wouldn't want to go there.
Ryen is great at basketball analysis.
Ryen also has no frickin clue as to what a superstar wants to do.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 9:19 pm to whatiknowsofar
Also all you sons that think "oh, Dame won't come play here, we're a terrible franchise"
We have young promising developing talent outside of zion.
WE HAVE ZION frickING WILLIAMSON, A NO EGO SUPERSTAR IN THE LEAGUE WHICH IS BASICALLY A frickING UNICORN
We have assets even after trading for Dame.
NOLA food
Cash Money
Dame cares about a lot of the above.
We have young promising developing talent outside of zion.
WE HAVE ZION frickING WILLIAMSON, A NO EGO SUPERSTAR IN THE LEAGUE WHICH IS BASICALLY A frickING UNICORN
We have assets even after trading for Dame.
NOLA food
Cash Money
Dame cares about a lot of the above.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 9:20 pm to whatiknowsofar
Shhh
Shel thinks he won an Internet argument by invoking *checks notes* Bill freaking Simmons and Ryen Russillo lol
…Which he had to contort their discussion to do anyways
Shel thinks he won an Internet argument by invoking *checks notes* Bill freaking Simmons and Ryen Russillo lol
…Which he had to contort their discussion to do anyways
Posted on 6/28/21 at 9:24 pm to shel311
quote:
Remember just maybe 2 days ago when I mentioned you were always the common denominator?
Bro you literally cold quoted me almost 24 hours after I made that statement. I don’t ever bother with your try hard argumentative nonsense unless to initiate it…and you always do
I’m living rent free in your head.
Popular
Back to top


0


