Started By
Message

re: NBA Draft Combine Measurements thread (all players)

Posted on 6/8/12 at 3:05 pm to
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160105 posts
Posted on 6/8/12 at 3:05 pm to
How tall did Davis measure at?
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279171 posts
Posted on 6/8/12 at 3:26 pm to
Anthony Davis

6' 9.25" socks

6' 10.5" shoes

7' 5.5" wing

9' 0" reach
This post was edited on 6/8/12 at 3:27 pm
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34445 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 8:25 am to
Drummond's reach was only an inch and a half higher
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63694 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 8:41 am to
quote:

How tall did Davis measure at?


Between the "a" and the "t".
Posted by Fleur de Diable
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
978 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 10:49 am to
9-18% =you're a fat arse


Classification Men (% fat)
Essential Fat 2-4%
Athletes 6-13%
Fitness 14-17%
Acceptable 18-25%
Obese 25% plus
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80808 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Fitness 14-17%
that is inaccurate considering you cannot have a 6 pack with over 11.5-12% BF
Posted by Fleur de Diable
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
978 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 12:21 pm to
How is this incorrect, what are your credentials to go against other health officials. Your fallacy is equating seeing abs with fitness. You're basically saying anyone without abs isn't fit, this assumption confuses me as to whether you're just trying to wind others up or you really are a moron. I'm assuming the latter.

Good Day Sir.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80808 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 1:08 pm to
So you are saying no a single person who is physically fit (the 'fitness' category) have abdominals? When I think of fitness, I think of myself and the people I see at my gym, 90% of whom have lower than 14% BF. do you know anything about fitness or are you just quoting links to online stores for baby products?

Eta- id love to find an active and fit person with 17% bf. Again, my view on fit is probably stricter than the average person since I am pretty intense with it
This post was edited on 6/9/12 at 1:19 pm
Posted by drake20
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
13123 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 1:10 pm to
i dont think he was saying that. it seemed like you were saying anyone that doesn't have a six pack isn't fit. and he was saying it's possible to be fit without a six pack. i don't know why he got so mad though.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80808 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 1:13 pm to
I was just using that as a ground marker. Most people who are into fitness and are fit, have abs. You cannot have abs unless you are below 12%. That's how I was comparing the percentages he listed since the ab is one muscle science actually have a BF % number you need to achieve in order to obtain.
Posted by Fleur de Diable
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
978 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 2:03 pm to
Your argument is basically your assumptions off of a small sample size(your gym). I think the possible rift with out definitions could be level of "definition"(pun intended) Are you meaning being able to see every single vein and ridge, or just being able to see you abs? As for link, i was just looking for that chart, but i could give you the isbn for a few textbooks that also have it. As for my knowledge of fitness, i could give it to you, but this is the internet and you'd have no true way of knowing if i was for real. And i believe there are plenty of "active and fit" people above 17%. Look at low scale marathons, there are always a few less than slim people runners in the race. There are those endomorphic people who just carry that stubborn fat. Also, the avg nfl LB is around 15% and the avg d-lineman is around 18%. In defense of myself, i will assure you that i'm in the gym 6/7 days, as well as research. My only question of you is, do you use straps for everything?

Edit: I can post give you the pdf of the paper on nil players and body fat, if you care to read
This post was edited on 6/9/12 at 2:06 pm
Posted by Fleur de Diable
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
978 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 2:11 pm to
In the best interest of everyone else on this board, we could just agree to disagree, and get back to talking about the hornets. I know i hate when these threads devolve this way.
Posted by aswemajor
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2011
1703 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

In the best interest of everyone else on this board, we could just agree to disagree, and get back to talking about the hornets.


This is a great line
Posted by kadillak
Member since Nov 2007
7641 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 2:32 pm to
when do they release verticals? or have they already done that?
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80808 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 3:51 pm to
I don't own straps...

Posted by Fleur de Diable
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
978 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

I don't own straps...


Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22096 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

when do they release verticals? or have they already done that?
Chad Ford said they'll start getting that information next week.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63694 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 6:02 pm to
Chill. All of you. Don't make me come in there!
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80808 posts
Posted on 6/9/12 at 7:00 pm to
Pipe down old timer, we're good
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram