- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nate Duncan kinda sorta gave Dumars credit
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:37 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:37 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
that shows your low iq. How good queen becomes directly proved what and why Dumars risked what he did. To find no correlation in that shows you are a tard that knows no boundaries
This is why you’re an idiot and front office lapdog Chad. There was not one NBA commenter who didn’t trash the trade because everyone knew Atlanta would have surely done it with a Top 5 trade protection. So the problem wasn’t they wanted Queen or drafted Queen, it’s because they gave away way more than they needed to accomplish it. And that’s idiotic no matter how good Queen becomes. To not realize that shows you’re a tard that knows no bounds.
Posted on 6/23/26 at 11:41 pm to BallHawk
quote:
As a trade goes he’s not inherently wrong but it’s also a dumb take. Because if we kept the pick we wouldn’t have taken Flemings. It’s not apples to apples.
More accurately, if we kept the pick we wouldn’t have been the only terrible team actively trying to win games after the New Year; and would have been picking at a spot better than 8.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 7:04 am to LSUgrad88
quote:
There was not one NBA commenter
Oh my god the horror.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:24 am to Chad504boy
You can't play what ifs and act those are actaul facts. If we did not pick DQ, we have zero idea of how the season would have played out. Maybe we are worse and still get the #8 pick bc of the lottery
It was a bad trade on paper at the time, but now it worked out.
But I am sure you are going to keep bitching and moaning about this for a long time.
It was a bad trade on paper at the time, but now it worked out.
But I am sure you are going to keep bitching and moaning about this for a long time.
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 8:26 am
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:38 am to Split2874
quote:
But I am sure you are going to keep bitching and moaning about this for a long time.
When you say you i'm assuming you are talking about thems.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:51 am to BallHawk
The Pelicans probably win less games without Queen and are likely drafting in a better position They also likely have the Pacers 1st round pick as well.
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 8:53 am
Posted on 6/24/26 at 9:01 am to tzimme4
quote:
They also likely have the Pacers 1st round pick as well.
The Pacers pick would have been drafted last year and was acquired in a separate trade. We have to stop comparing a top 4 Pacers pick to the value of Queen. We trade #23 not a top 4 pick.
And I'd rather Queen > Newell/ Flemings/ #23
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 9:06 am
Posted on 6/24/26 at 9:26 am to Dantheman504
Yeah you're completely wrong 
Posted on 6/24/26 at 9:35 am to tzimme4
quote:
Yeah you're completely wrong
Yeah okay. You can say whatever you want but give me these stats as a rookie:
33pts/ 10reb/ 10ast (VS Wemby)
14pts/ 16reb/ 12ast
30pts/ 22reb
30pts/ 9reb/ 4ast (VS Jokic)
20 pts/ 7 reb/ 11ast
Close to (4) Trip Dubs and a 30/20 game as a rookie? Y'all hate on Queen but dick ride guys like Jose and Herb. WILD.
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 9:39 am
Posted on 6/24/26 at 10:52 am to Dantheman504
Queen isn't the problem. It's the 20th century front office idiot running the team.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:12 am to tzimme4
quote:
Queen isn't the problem. It's the 20th century front office idiot running the team.
So we are upset based on a unknown perceived evaluation of a GM who so far has won a Championship as a GM and made a solid trade in acquiring Queen?
Where is the hate coming from? We don't know what he does here. The Queen trade was good and he won a championship with his last team.
How the frick can you make any negative deductions from those only 2 things that happen to both be positives?
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:19 am to Dantheman504
He's proven he was a terrible NBA executive with the Pistons which is why he was fired. And he's continued to do the same here. The league has continued on without him, he's aged out.
Just because you loaned out money to someone and they spent it all with no way of paying it back. But they happen to win the lottery the week it was due, doesn't mean you need to loan that person money a 2nd and 3rd time
Just because you loaned out money to someone and they spent it all with no way of paying it back. But they happen to win the lottery the week it was due, doesn't mean you need to loan that person money a 2nd and 3rd time
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 11:20 am
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:26 am to tzimme4
quote:
He's proven he was a terrible NBA executive with the Pistons which is why he was fired.
After winning a championship? So you'd be upset if we end up firing him after he wins a championship? That's fricking retarded.
quote:
And he's continued to do the same here.
You just said Queen isn't the problem and the trade isn't looking bad so what crazy thing has he done in less than a year that would drive this conclusion. Its year 1 of a rebuild and new GM, how the frick could he do that much without even changing anything?
Seriously we didn't trade a single player on the team. We traded an imaginary picks for a real player that hapoened to be good. That's it.
Did he trade Z, Herb, Trey, DJ, Missi? Did he miss on Fears/ Queen? What the frick has he done wrong? Did he not turn CJ into Sadiq Bey?
Y'all are miserable.
This post was edited on 6/24/26 at 11:27 am
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:30 am to Dantheman504
quote:So you cherry pick a few games. He had some fantastic games but if you watched more than a few games, you would see that he has a long ways to go. He is a work in progress. Hopefully a full offseason and more maturity will help him take the next step forward. He has a chance, but is nowhere near there yet.
Yeah okay. You can say whatever you want but give me these stats as a rookie:
33pts/ 10reb/ 10ast (VS Wemby)
14pts/ 16reb/ 12ast
30pts/ 22reb
30pts/ 9reb/ 4ast (VS Jokic)
20 pts/ 7 reb/ 11ast
Close to (4) Trip Dubs and a 30/20 game as a rookie? Y'all hate on Queen but dick ride guys like Jose and Herb. WILD.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 11:35 am to Dantheman504
No you're just too retarded to understand
Posted on 6/24/26 at 4:54 pm to Split2874
quote:
It was a bad trade on paper at the time, but now it worked out.
It worked out?? What?? If Dumars isn’t completely incompetent and puts a Top 5 protection on the pick (and this failure to do so is why every NBA writer panned it) we have Queen and almost surely a Top 5 pick this year. Why is this so hard to understand for so many? Chad is a lapdog for the front office, so I get his intentional ignorance.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:20 pm to Pelicans15
quote:
Queen will be hoisting finals mvp trophy one day in nola
This some SuperSaint type shite you’re on.
Let me try some.
Posted on 6/24/26 at 8:24 pm to P0SEIDON
I don't think you can handle it
Popular
Back to top

1






