6
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Murray going off on Twitter
Posted on 11/12/26 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 12:55 pm to Soggymoss
Posted on 11/12/26 at 12:58 pm to BaronDavisGhost
Cool. Trade him
Buy out Poole
Buy out Poole
Posted on 11/12/26 at 12:58 pm to BaronDavisGhost
Murray throwing shots directly at the organization. I love it. Let’s see how Dumars responds. I’m gonna say that Dumars is not gonna handle this well. He’ll trade a 1st just to get rid of Dejounte
Posted on 11/12/26 at 12:59 pm to Soggymoss
So we have a player reads Pro Pels Talk all day long. Gosh he needs to go asap. This guy not even preparing for next game. Wake up Joe!
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:00 pm to Soggymoss
Damn we got a tigerdroppings guy getting blasted by a player. Might actually have to follow PPT again.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:02 pm to Soggymoss
Might as well just sit him on the bench. He’s trying to force a trade I’d just sit him instead of wasting picks to get rid of him.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:04 pm to Soggymoss
He's looking right at him when makes a off target weaker than Caitlin Clarke pass.
Bey refuses to even look at him. Yes. He should never play another second for this team.
Bey refuses to even look at him. Yes. He should never play another second for this team.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:07 pm to Peytonknows
quote:
I’d just sit him instead of wasting picks to get rid of him.
We aren't wasting a pick to get rid of him.
He's not a negative asset. He's devaluing his value but the value is positive. We are talking about getting less, not owing more.
And attaching a pick to get rid of a player that is talking about bad management would be a genius strategy and definitely wouldn't make Murray look like he has a point.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:11 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
He's not a negative asset. He's devaluing his value but the value is positive.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:11 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
He's not a negative asset. He's devaluing his value but the value is positive. We are talking about getting less, not owing more.
if his value is positive, why is he still here
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:12 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
He's not a negative asset. He's devaluing his value but the value is positive. We are talking about getting less, not owing more
Why do you think he’s not a negative asset? He’s coming off an Achilles tear, has played like shite, gets paid 30m, and has been a cancer in every organization he’s been in. What teams are lining up to trade for that?
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:19 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
if his value is positive, why is he still here
Probably because many of the assets teams want to trade for have trade restrictions until December or January.
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:22 pm to Balsamic_duck
quote:
Why do you think he’s not a negative asset?
Why do you think he is a negative asset? Any player that comes to the Pels becomes a "negative asset". Not all teams are sitting there going "he played bad for the Pels so we are going to expect the same for us"
A negative asset and a devalued asset are very different. One gets you less and the other will cost you to get rid of them. Not sure why that's funny,. That's actually a lie, I 100% can see why certain people would read that and only be able to process giggles.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:24 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
Why do you think he is a negative asset? Any player that comes to the Pels becomes a "negative asset". Not all teams are sitting there going "he played bad for the Pels so we are going to expect the same for us" A negative asset and a devalued asset are very different. One gets you less and the other will cost you to get rid of them. Not sure why that's funny,. That's actually a lie, I 100% can see why certain people would read that and only be able to process giggles.
I gave you reasons he’s a negative asset. He’s coming off an Achilles tear, he’s played like shite, he’s being paid a lot of money and has been a cancer on every team he’s been on
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:26 pm to Balsamic_duck
If Joe doesn’t address this then he’s a straight up bitch. Murray just called you out. You can’t just ignore this
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:27 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
Why do you think he is a negative asset? Any player that comes to the Pels becomes a "negative asset". Not all teams are sitting there going "he played bad for the Pels so we are going to expect the same for us" A negative asset and a devalued asset are very different. One gets you less and the other will cost you to get rid of them. Not sure why that's funny,. That's actually a lie, I 100% can see why certain people would read that and only be able to process giggles.
You also thought we weren’t going to have to give up assets to dump Hawkins when literally everyone else told you otherwise. You clearly have no concept of value in the NBA
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:28 pm to Balsamic_duck
quote:
You also thought we weren’t going to have to give up assets to dump Hawkins when literally everyone else told you otherwise. You clearly have no concept of value in the NBA
Zero
Expiring contracts don't have the value they did, and Murray has a huge player option anyway
The word seems to be out on Dejounte as to what a shite teammate he is
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:35 pm to Balsamic_duck
quote:
You also thought we weren’t going to have to give up assets to dump Hawkins when literally everyone else told you otherwise.
We didn't "have to". We chose to do it in order to afford Mathurin. Otherwise yes its possible we could have traded him for a 2nd or even nothing without needing the extra space.
And are you trying to compare Jordan Hawkins to Dejounte Murray?
I'd imagine Dejounte for J Green or J Green + 2nds would be the most logical move right now.
Unless we are waiting until other players become available from trade restrictions like I stated earlier.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:48 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
We aren't wasting a pick to get rid of him.
He's not a negative asset. He's devaluing his value but the value is positive. We are talking about getting less, not owing more.
And attaching a pick to get rid of a player that is talking about bad management would be a genius strategy and definitely wouldn't make Murray look like he has a point.
What point would it have to get to for you to just sit back and say, "Yea, this organization is a disaster"?
I know you were upset that DM didn't make the top 100 NBA list so you obviously think he is a good player, but the guy is booty cheeks. Maybe we wouldn't have to attach something with him but that doesn't mean he is a positive asset. We are 1-8 with him and he hates the team and is a cancer. That's not a positive asset. He's actively hurting the team. That's a negative asset, whether you can get a second rounder for him or not.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News