
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Mavs without Luka vs. Pels without Zion
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:05 pm to yaboidarrell
Except the Pels without Zion outscored the Mavs without Luka considerably.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:05 pm to yaboidarrell
Mavs won without Luka
We lost without Zion …again
We lost without Zion …again
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:07 pm to England_Pelican
quote:
Mavs won without Luka We lost without Zion …again
How many points did Luka score? Since he didn’t play at all tonight.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:08 pm to yaboidarrell
Lol tell me you didn’t watch the last 18 minutes without actually telling me
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:08 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:
Except the Pels without Zion outscored the Mavs without Luka considerably.
Moral victory FTL
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:09 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
For reference Luka had 31 points in 23 minutes.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:10 pm to Broski
quote:
Moral victory FTL
No it’s context for a shitty thread.
This post was edited on 2/2/23 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:11 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:
No it’s context for a shitty a thread.
It's context that really means nothing, considering the result was still the same whether Luka was on the floor or not.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:15 pm to Broski
If Mavs minus Luka played Pels without Zion, Pels would’ve won by 20. Luka exploited the Pels for more than half the game. Just stop.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:17 pm to BMTiger
quote:
If Mavs minus Luka played Pels without Zion, Pels would’ve won by 20. Luka exploited the Pels for more than half the game. Just stop.
Great, who gives a frick?
We still lost because the Pels without Zion gave up 70 points in a half for the second time in like 4 games.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:21 pm to Broski
quote:
We still lost because the Pels without Zion gave up 70 points in a half for the second time in like 4 games.
And Luka had 27 of those 70. Context for a dumb thread.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:22 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:
And Luka had 27 of those 70. Context for a dumb thread.
What does any of this mean for the Pelicans?
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:23 pm to Broski
It means LeBron may break the record against the Pels and I think I saw +4800 odds earlier tonight.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:26 pm to TigerinATL
Why does that matter to so many?
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:27 pm to TigerinATL
It's going to murder my soul if they beat us on our floor to tie us in the west.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:32 pm to Broski
Lakers would hold the tiebreaker as well so we would be behind them in the standings
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:34 pm to Gabe Rippen
Did graham seem to play less to y’all tonight? What could it mean if so. Trade? Injury?
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:37 pm to Tigerpride18
quote:
Did graham seem to play less to y’all tonight? What could it mean if so. Trade? Injury?
I think they were showcasing Lewis
Posted on 2/2/23 at 10:38 pm to Broski
quote:
What does any of this mean for the Pelicans?
That the Mavs had Luka for the game…so this thread is dumb.

Popular
Back to top


3








