- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How bad is this 2021 draft?
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:14 pm to supe12sta12z
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:14 pm to supe12sta12z
You are being pretty aggressive defending a guy that as you say, shot 70% from the FT line.
If the guy was pushing 90% I’d say odds are better than not he has the tools and form to develop a good NBA jumper, but 70% is almost 10% below NBA league average, even lower for a guard, I wouldn’t say it’s a guarantee at all that he even becomes average.
If the guy was pushing 90% I’d say odds are better than not he has the tools and form to develop a good NBA jumper, but 70% is almost 10% below NBA league average, even lower for a guard, I wouldn’t say it’s a guarantee at all that he even becomes average.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:15 pm to LSUJD_04
I'd be very worried if the team thinks they can solve the shooting issues solely through the draft. So I don't think that's their thought process. They're going to take who they think is the best player and fit for this team and if that player is a sharpshooter, then it's gravy. The good news is that there are quite a few quality shooters in this upcoming free agency and that's where they should be focusing on when it comes to shooting.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:19 pm to Bronc
I put more stock in guys like Johnson and Bouknight developing a shot vs guys like Barnes and Kuminga. 70% at the line is where I draw the line on how I see their potential in developing a shot.
This post was edited on 5/19/21 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:19 pm to Bronc
70% is decent for college. I think that’s almost exactly the college average.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:22 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:Yep 33%
Marcus Smart developed into a competent shooter you dickwad.
My point is that not everyone develops a shot. That's it. You're acting as if everyone figures it out. I'm saying that he could do it, he hasn't shown it yet, therefore it's still up in the air. I didn't even say that it was unlikely just that it was a big "if". The literal definition of a "big if" is "something that is both important and uncertain". Geez, take a lap.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:25 pm to Epic Cajun
6 attempts a game. You clearly haven't watched the evolution of Smart. It's not an elite shooter by any stretch of the imagination but he's very competent unlike a guy like Simmons. Enough that Stevens gives him the green light. But keep focusing on stats without context.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:29 pm to supe12sta12z
Simmons is one of the worst shooters in the league. You can not develop a shot a still be a better shooter than Simmons.
Are you really arguing that Smart is a good shooter? He's had one season where he shot league average
I'm perplexed that you think everyone should automatically assume someone will be a good shooter because they shot 70% from the line in college. Could he? Yes, I never denied that. But, acting as if it should be assumed is asinine.
ETA: are you his brother or just a Stan?
Are you really arguing that Smart is a good shooter? He's had one season where he shot league average
I'm perplexed that you think everyone should automatically assume someone will be a good shooter because they shot 70% from the line in college. Could he? Yes, I never denied that. But, acting as if it should be assumed is asinine.
ETA: are you his brother or just a Stan?
This post was edited on 5/19/21 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:33 pm to Epic Cajun
You keep twisting words. I said several times now that Smart is a competent shooter. You don't listen very well. I said there is evidence that Johnson can develop a shot. You keep come back and acting like I said he's going to be a great shooter. But keep imagining it.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:36 pm to supe12sta12z
I think the issue is that you don't understand what the phrase "big if" means. It's the term that triggered you with my initial comment.
It just means "important and uncertain". That's it.
If you're going to argue against the "uncertain" part of that, then I don't know what to tell you.
It just means "important and uncertain". That's it.
If you're going to argue against the "uncertain" part of that, then I don't know what to tell you.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:37 pm to Chad504boy
IMO, this class is probably most comparable to the 2018 class as draft prospects in recent years. Went into the draft with a good top tier of Ayton, Doncic, Bagley, JJJ, and Young at the top. Then you go late into the lottery with guys like SGA, both Bridges, Porter. Zhiare Smith slipped out the lottery when many thought he was a top 10 prospect. Robert Williams and Mitchell Robinson slipped way down the draft when they were considered lottery talents because of respective question marks.
Just looking at guys I've seen discussed in the lottery tier: Cade, Mobley, Suggs, Green /// Kuminga, Barnes, Keon, Springer, Giddey, Garuba, Moody, Isaiah Jack, Kai, DMitch, Kispert, Bouknight, Wagner, Mann, Jalen Johnson, Rife, ZWill. There's some really good depth to that second tier. For example, I view Kai Jones as similar draft prospect as Jax and there's a pretty good chance that Kai goes outside of the lottery.
Just looking at guys I've seen discussed in the lottery tier: Cade, Mobley, Suggs, Green /// Kuminga, Barnes, Keon, Springer, Giddey, Garuba, Moody, Isaiah Jack, Kai, DMitch, Kispert, Bouknight, Wagner, Mann, Jalen Johnson, Rife, ZWill. There's some really good depth to that second tier. For example, I view Kai Jones as similar draft prospect as Jax and there's a pretty good chance that Kai goes outside of the lottery.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:48 pm to TeddyPadillac
I really like Moses Moody or Korey Kispert with our 1st round pick. Also, I like Jared Butler or Chris Duarte (although he may slip to us in the 2nd) if we can somehow sneak into the backend of the 1st. I’m not sure if we can draft a starter in this draft but I would consider two solid shooters off the bench a win.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 12:53 pm to Mad Scientist26
I really like Duarte and like him better than Kispert as he's a better defender and is the better athlete. It's unfortunate that he's turning 24 when the draft rolls around.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 1:15 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
I could see the argument, I'm not in love with Keon Johnson or Jalen Johnson for instance
When I watch Keon Johnson I really like what he does defensively, and I think a guy that takes the approach that he does to the defensive end of the court is exacly what this team needs.
But then you look at the offensive game, and there's just nothing there for me. Sure he's got potential, but you can only rely on potential for so long. Somebody in this thread said "even Austin Rivers figured out how to shoot." Rivers shot 37% from three at Duke. Keon is a 27% guy. He's not a threat, and I know we all want to sit here and say that he will get better, but how often does someone that bad even become average?
I went back and looked at the guys selected in the lottery of the last 10 drafts and the list of guys who were sub 30% shooters in college and became even average in the NBA is pretty short. Kawhi, Otto Porter, Jaylen Brown, and Donovan Mitchell. Obviously there's a theme with 3/4 of those guys, but the list of guys who were bad in college and stayed bad in the NBA is much much longer.
Johnson is intriguing, but kind of weird to me at the same time. If you just look at a picture of him you would think he's this 6'9" super athletic wing, but I don't think he has the lateral quickness to defend on the perimeter in the NBA. And he lacks a first step and shot creation offensively to play on the wing. He's just a weird prospect in general.
Posted on 5/19/21 at 1:44 pm to CP3forMVP
quote:
But then you look at the offensive game, and there's just nothing there for me. Sure he's got potential, but you can only rely on potential for so long. Somebody in this thread said "even Austin Rivers figured out how to shoot." Rivers shot 37% from three at Duke. Keon is a 27% guy. He's not a threat, and I know we all want to sit here and say that he will get better, but how often does someone that bad even become average?
How fricking dare you
Posted on 5/20/21 at 11:14 am to Bronc
quote:
70% is almost 10% below NBA league average
its 77%
if a prospect is below avg ft he better do something at a premier level for me to take him.
This post was edited on 5/20/21 at 11:20 am
Posted on 5/20/21 at 8:01 pm to Mad Scientist26
I think Moses Moody and Davion Mitchell are the two prospects that would make the most sense for us, in our projected range.
Moody has the higher upside for sure. Dude has an insane ceiling as a defender, with his 6'6 height and 7'0 wingspan. He is a menace on the wing and can effectively guard 1-4. His movement off-ball and his willingness to take big shots is exactly what we need offensively. Think of all how well JJ fit with Zion year one, before he became a shell of himself, their two man game really worked well. That was primarily because of the constant motion from JJ stretching the defense and Zion being able to capitalize or dish for the three. We need someone who brings that to the starting unit. I think Moody is the perfect 2-3 for us. He brings shooting and defense. Y'all want a true 3&D wing, this is the guy. He will turn 19 right before the draft, so they sky is the limit with Moody.
On the other hand, you have Davion Mitchell. Griff says he wants toughness, BBIQ and shooting. Meet Davion Mitchell, the definition of those three qualities in a national champion prospect, who comes into the league ready to contribute from day one (something Griff and co. will probably prefer at this point). He can catch and shoot or shoot of the dribble, something only BI offers right now in the starting five. Mitchell is tenacious at the point of attack defensively and would set the tone for the entire team defensively. We always talk about wanting an alpha dog type that gives 100% all the time, I think Mitchell is that guy. He is also a decent secondary creator, great leader and teammate and overall winner. He has a champions mindset. You could see it on display in the NCG. I try not to go overboard with evaluating prospects just from their March madness performances, but Mitchell's was so good, it's impossible to ignore.
I think if we stay in the 8-10 range, these are the two guys who fit us the best. I also like Garuba and wish we could get another mid first to grab him.
Moody has the higher upside for sure. Dude has an insane ceiling as a defender, with his 6'6 height and 7'0 wingspan. He is a menace on the wing and can effectively guard 1-4. His movement off-ball and his willingness to take big shots is exactly what we need offensively. Think of all how well JJ fit with Zion year one, before he became a shell of himself, their two man game really worked well. That was primarily because of the constant motion from JJ stretching the defense and Zion being able to capitalize or dish for the three. We need someone who brings that to the starting unit. I think Moody is the perfect 2-3 for us. He brings shooting and defense. Y'all want a true 3&D wing, this is the guy. He will turn 19 right before the draft, so they sky is the limit with Moody.
On the other hand, you have Davion Mitchell. Griff says he wants toughness, BBIQ and shooting. Meet Davion Mitchell, the definition of those three qualities in a national champion prospect, who comes into the league ready to contribute from day one (something Griff and co. will probably prefer at this point). He can catch and shoot or shoot of the dribble, something only BI offers right now in the starting five. Mitchell is tenacious at the point of attack defensively and would set the tone for the entire team defensively. We always talk about wanting an alpha dog type that gives 100% all the time, I think Mitchell is that guy. He is also a decent secondary creator, great leader and teammate and overall winner. He has a champions mindset. You could see it on display in the NCG. I try not to go overboard with evaluating prospects just from their March madness performances, but Mitchell's was so good, it's impossible to ignore.
I think if we stay in the 8-10 range, these are the two guys who fit us the best. I also like Garuba and wish we could get another mid first to grab him.
This post was edited on 5/20/21 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 5/20/21 at 8:43 pm to RUFshreve
Agreed with this entire post.
Mitchell is basically Marcus Smart with a better jump shot.
Moody is the definition of a 3 & D wing.
Mitchell is basically Marcus Smart with a better jump shot.
Moody is the definition of a 3 & D wing.
Posted on 5/20/21 at 9:54 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Mitchell is basically Marcus Smart with a better jump shot.
this would a good one to throw in a couple of 2nds to move up 2 spots and snag him.
Posted on 5/21/21 at 8:41 am to RUFshreve
quote:
I think Moses Moody and Davion Mitchell are the two prospects that would make the most sense for us, in our projected range.
Depending on where we pick (13-20ish) I'm all in for Moody. I think defense is our biggest need and this guy can defend the entire floor... and he takes pride in doing so. The fact that he can score as well is the cherry on top. He's a mature kid and I believe this team could use someone with his type of personality and business like mentality.
Popular
Back to top


3



