- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hornets 24/7 "Rumor" regarding 10th pick
Posted on 6/19/12 at 7:43 pm to supe12sta12z
Posted on 6/19/12 at 7:43 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:
No. You sheeps are just dumb.
What sheep? The 3rd post in the thread sources the rumor to nbadraft.net forums.
quote:
Interesting they say Milsap when someone at HR posted a 2nd handed rumor about millsap burkes and #47 for #10 and someone else to balance it out possibly okafor or Ariza.
LINK
If you don't like us discussing potential trades, whether they are in the works or not, then maybe you should go read another board.
0
Posted on 6/19/12 at 7:49 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
did they really rip it from there?
Since when does something being in two places on the internet imply that it is either false or that one `copied' the other?
I can't convince someone who does not want to be convinced, but plenty of people appreciate what Hornets247 does. Not everyone there is under the same `agenda' or brings the same things to the table. Different people have different ways of gathering information, but a track record speaks for itself.
Talking about deals that may or may not happen makes the issue blurry, but I can come back to that if you want, but here are some glaring entries in the track record:
LINK
Sullinger dropping down the boards due to medical concerns, one leg shorter than then other by a significant amount, posted 3 months ago.
LINK
TV to Fox, 4.5 months ago.
Find out where that was ripped. You can pick on my style, sure, but covering sources so you can continue to share information is more important than bragging about your rolodex.
Let me know if you want more. And let me know if you can find a string of major errors that puts me or the twitter guy in the category of "people who just repeat rumors," as if that method could produce a track record of success.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 7:58 pm to rondo
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:05 pm to Maximus
THUNDER UP
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:26 pm to tehchampion140
Nah he's right. This trade makes little sense IMO.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:40 pm to 42
quote:
Since when does something being in two places on the internet imply that it is either false or that one `copied' the other?
I can't convince someone who does not want to be convinced, but plenty of people appreciate what Hornets247 does. Not everyone there is under the same `agenda' or brings the same things to the table. Different people have different ways of gathering information, but a track record speaks for itself.
Talking about deals that may or may not happen makes the issue blurry, but I can come back to that if you want, but here are some glaring entries in the track record:
LINK /
Sullinger dropping down the boards due to medical concerns, one leg shorter than then other by a significant amount, posted 3 months ago.
LINK /
TV to Fox, 4.5 months ago.
Find out where that was ripped. You can pick on my style, sure, but covering sources so you can continue to share information is more important than bragging about your rolodex.
Let me know if you want more. And let me know if you can find a string of major errors that puts me or the twitter guy in the category of "people who just repeat rumors," as if that method could produce a track record of success.
Are you serious with the BS?!
1st: The leg thing was never confirmed and is still 100% speculation.
2nd: There were only 2 places that listed the Sullinger leg being shorter than the other. One was during the NCAA tournament via commentator and swishscout.
The only track record 247 has is throwing 100 BS rumor out and hitting on 1 and claiming it as gospel. GTFO of here with this ish.
You keep digging that hole 247.
This post was edited on 6/19/12 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:43 pm to supe12sta12z
Say what you want, there is no hole digging.
And you didn't address the TV piece.
Again, can't please everyone. Feel free to follow whatever it is you follow and disregard one of many good information sources out there.
You prefer . . . what? Or are you just complaining? Maybe you got your feelings hurt somewhere? A little booboo? A wittle wittle baby boodoo?
awwwww. . . . .
And you didn't address the TV piece.
Again, can't please everyone. Feel free to follow whatever it is you follow and disregard one of many good information sources out there.
You prefer . . . what? Or are you just complaining? Maybe you got your feelings hurt somewhere? A little booboo? A wittle wittle baby boodoo?
awwwww. . . . .
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:45 pm to supe12sta12z
Name a few that were said that were shown false.
Should be easy with so many out there.
And thanks for editing to add that I nailed it.
You are welcome.
Should be easy with so many out there.
And thanks for editing to add that I nailed it.
You are welcome.
This post was edited on 6/19/12 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:46 pm to 42
quote:
Say what you want, there is no hole digging.
And you didn't address the TV piece.
Again, can't please everyone. Feel free to follow whatever it is you follow and disregard one of many good information sources out there.
You prefer . . . what? Or are you just complaining? Maybe you got your feelings hurt somewhere? A little booboo? A wittle wittle baby boodoo?
awwwww. . . . .
You go off the tangent because you have nothing to add.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:48 pm to 42
quote:
Maybe you got your feelings hurt somewhere? A little booboo? A wittle wittle baby boodoo?
awwwww. . . . .
Honestly, you are being really defensive, as well. Man up and let that shite roll off.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:50 pm to Jester
You guys are making me look good. Be careful.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:50 pm to Jester
If it was me he was talking about, it would be being defensive.
But fine. If outchildishing the childmind isn't the way to go, I'll just await proof.
Again, there is a track record for anyone to evaluate and I'm open to questions.
But fine. If outchildishing the childmind isn't the way to go, I'll just await proof.
Again, there is a track record for anyone to evaluate and I'm open to questions.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:53 pm to 42
And yet, you are doing exactly what I said earlier in the post. you hit on 1 piece of information and harp on it like you're all of a sudden credible. You and your cronies made plenty of outlandish claims and most amounted to nothing. And usually almost always claim that only 1% of stuff discussed go through and yet you're extremely quick to defend the 1 piece of info you hit on.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:53 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:
You go off the tangent because you have nothing to add.
Waiting on a couple of those 100. It's you that have nothing to add and I'm bored.
And your post about 247 was a tangent . . . this was about the information, not the messenger.
This post was edited on 6/19/12 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:55 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:
And yet, you are doing exactly what I said earlier in the post. you hit on 1 piece of information and harp on it like you're all of a sudden credible. You and your cronies made plenty of outlandish claims and most amounted to nothing. And usually almost always claim that only 1% of stuff discussed go through and yet you're extremely quick to defend the 1 piece of info you hit on.
And you can't do what you claim . . . provide examples.
Waiting. Counting the exampleless posts.
One more, and I'm done with you, and I hope others will be too. There's only so many times you can cry wolf.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:57 pm to 42
LOL. You're seriously diluted. As with cp3 and 11 others. A bunch of fruad no better than Fletch Mackel. 
Posted on 6/19/12 at 8:59 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:
LOL. You're seriously diluted. As with cp3 and 11 others. A bunch of fruad no better than Fletch Mackel.
You mean deluded. And you are misusing that. Still no examples.
Let me know when you have something credible to say. And some examples to back up your claims.
I brought mine and I can bring more, but I already ponied up.
Have a day.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 9:01 pm to 42
No, I absolutely meant diluted. Maybe you can take all of your degrees and try to comprehend what people are saying rather than what you want them to say.
Posted on 6/19/12 at 9:02 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:
No, I absolutely meant diluted. Maybe you can take all of your degrees and try to comprehend what people are saying rather than what you want them to say.
A fan.
See? I had it called. It's easy to spot.
Another call!
Aaaand still no counterexample. How many times can you fail to deliver? How many times has that been asked?
Posted on 6/19/12 at 9:04 pm to 42
Well the reason I stopped reading you guys a couple of years ago is because you were so eager to get "inside access" that you were completely unobjective at how shitty Shinn / Bower were.
JEFF frickING BOWER WAS OUR COACH and your writers were doing yoga in order to see who could fellate that fat no talent frick the hardest.
JEFF frickING BOWER WAS OUR COACH and your writers were doing yoga in order to see who could fellate that fat no talent frick the hardest.
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News