- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Goran Dragic Point/Counter-Point
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:20 pm to corndeaux
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:20 pm to corndeaux
quote:
What is so hard for you to comprehend here:
Every one of your thoughts is a contradiction. They are very vague & not well thought out.. Maybe that is why Im having trouble comprehending?
I don't think they should pay him 10 million a year either. Ive said that at least 3 times. So you have your own comprehension issues.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 2:23 pm to drake20
quote:
if he starts again next year and puts up near 16 and 6, he's gonna get paid...too much imo
I'm not so sure. Playoff teams would likely see him as a backup and can't offer him more than $5 million. Is he really going to want to go to a worse situation for an extra few million a year? I know that sounds like a stupid question at first, but at his age, maybe he'd prefer getting paid $5 - $6 million to be an up and coming Hornets 6th man than getting paid $7-$8 million to start for a rebuilding team.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 3:01 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Every one of your thoughts is a contradiction.
You would be the expert on contradictions. You claim that Dragic's stats are irrelevant except when they prove your point.
Posted on 5/16/12 at 3:43 pm to corndeaux
Again, you can't read. I never said they were irrelevant.
But playing 17MPG coming off the bench, playing sporadically isn't exactly a great way to judge a player.
The NBA is full of guys that blossom once they get minutes. Whether they were stuck behind a better player(Dragic in this case) , or just immature.
The NBA revolves around projecting players.
But playing 17MPG coming off the bench, playing sporadically isn't exactly a great way to judge a player.
The NBA is full of guys that blossom once they get minutes. Whether they were stuck behind a better player(Dragic in this case) , or just immature.
The NBA revolves around projecting players.
This post was edited on 5/16/12 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 5/17/12 at 8:24 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Lester Earl
quote:
Again, you can't read. I never said they were irrelevant.
quote:
But it's not very relevant considering he was stuck behind a HOF Poing guard.
It's a lot more important that when given the chance to start, he has shined.
Posted on 5/19/12 at 6:30 pm to corndeaux
JJ was our whole team which forced HIM to HAVE to score. Now with EG he can be more of a passing guard PLUS we know now that he can score and lead the team if needed
Popular
Back to top

1





