Started By
Message

Brian Windhorst - Pels may be BUYING, not selling at deadline

Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:48 am
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30543 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:48 am
quote:

"Right now, my feel on the Pelicans is that they're actually looking to acquire another veteran as opposed to selling off a veteran. If anything, the Pelicans have seen what a big difference it made to get Derrick Favors back and they think if they could get another veteran into their rotation, that it may even help them more." "I sense from the Pelicans they may be buyers."

From Brian Windhorst’s podcast
LINK

I’m not a fan of Windhorst but he makes a good point, the organization has not given us any indication that they will tank, and we know Gayle wants us to compete
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30543 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:49 am to
It’s my opinion that Griffin should be buying talent, not veterans. This team is not ready to win big. I don’t want more Dell Demps mediocrity by continually acquiring players without a real chance of winning big. We need to think long term, not short term. The only reason I’d think short term is if you’re scared you’ll lose the fan base by not competing. But with Zion you’ve bought yourself a couple years of not competing IMO
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30083 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:52 am to
I mean there are a few vets who could make a difference and do both.

Miller+Williams+2 2nds
for
Covington

for example
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9932 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:54 am to
I think it’s more of a belief in “raising the kids” in a good environment. It’s a fine line to walk because if you trade away all vets and lose too much, then you end up affecting the young guys. You want to win with them, not “win now” sacrificing the future type moves, but more like moving Melli or Miller and a second or two or another vet big who can help with the growth of Zion/Hayes.

We already have a ton of youth plus Didi and lots of future seconds. Adding another vet to replace Jah, Miller, Melli, Frank doesn’t compromise the future. We shouldn’t and won’t be tanking considering this weak draft and the strength of our young core.
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 12:00 pm
Posted by BarroldBonds
Member since Feb 2018
103 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:55 am to
quote:


It’s my opinion that Griffin should be buying talent, not veterans.

I think this is taking Windhorst a little bit too literally. Acquiring a guy like RoCo can lead to success both in the short term and the long term
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30543 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:58 am to
A couple of y’all have said RoCo but he’s gonna get a high price, something we probably can’t afford. Sixers def want him and probably Lakers too, among other teams. He’s one of the best available vets right now
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:00 pm to
Buy?

At what price?

This idea suggests pels mgmt is scared jrue is going to be a while.

Im sure a solid vet would improve bench. Naw/hayes both lacking key elements of game.

I guess mgmt wants zion to join a solid situation.

I just hope the price makes sense.

The pels are not making playoffs.
Ill stop posting in pels board for a year if pels make playoffs.


This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 12:10 pm
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30543 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:29 pm to
I agree. We should not be looking at high price vets to compete. If it’s low price vets to teach younger players, sure go ahead. But it’s gotta make sense with our long term plan
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25444 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Miller+Williams+2 2nds
for
Covington


That's not enough for him. He's probably the most sought after trade target right now that everyone knows is available.

If we are going to add someone, it'll be someone we can get sending out Miller+ expirings and our Cleveland or Washinton 2nds, i would think, and it would be for someone who can backup Zion at the 4.

Miller to Miami straight up for Olynyk or Leonard gets Miami out the tax.

Miller/Melli and a 2nd for Marcus Morris, who as i alluded to a few weeks ago is shooting 47% from 3 on almost 6 attempts a game. Probably need to throw a 2nd or two at them for him.

Derrick Rose is still playing well. Makes the same as Miller. I'm sure Clevelands 2 2nds would be enough. Detroit isn't looking to win anymore. Griffin is probably done for the year and they been looking to move Drummond.


Gallinari is probably still available. Miller/Moore/Melli would work, although i'm sure they want Clevelands picks at a minimum. OKC is just barely in the tax, so they will do something.

John Henson in Cleveland makes Miller money.
Posted by Silverfoxx
Member since Mar 2016
880 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:43 pm to
Man gtfoh with this lmaoooo. I know this was a example but can it be more realistic? I'm sure they would at least want one of our future first for Roco
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110661 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

A couple of y’all have said RoCo but he’s gonna get a high price, something we probably can’t afford. Sixers def want him and probably Lakers too, among other teams. He’s one of the best available vets right now

PRetty sure the Lakers and 76ers will be over the cap and won't be able to offer him much.
Posted by roguepelican
Member since Jan 2019
1507 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:52 pm to
Hmm this sounds more like wed looking at someone like iguadola which I'd be down with
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14157 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:53 pm to
Neither of those 2 really have any assets to send out..

Minnesota will want draft picks
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30543 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:56 pm to
Sixers can move salary to make it work. The issue is they’d probably have to include picks to maintain the roster pieces they want, and their picks are gonna be late and not worth much. I’m just saying a lot of contenders will be in the market for RoCo, and we’ll have to outbid them. We shouldn’t
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30543 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:57 pm to
Everyone will want RoCo. There’s gonna be a bidding war, and we should not be in a bidding war for a veteran
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14157 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:59 pm to
Miller, Frank our 2nd, Milwaukee 2nd, and our lottery protected 1st would be a better bid than most could put, amd it's not giving up too much for him, especially on his deal
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 1:00 pm
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63440 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 1:10 pm to
My first thought was the Dell Demps syndrome, but I have to believe that Griff, based on his rep and track record, has more foresight than that.

Right???
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11852 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 1:16 pm to
If the Kings are dumping, something like Miller and a 2nd for Ariza could fortify the bench.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30083 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 1:16 pm to
It's just an example, obviously. But regardless of Lakers or Philly what assets do they have? Kuzma?

High 2nds have more value than late 1sts, we see it all the time when it comes down to penny pinching as well.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30543 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 1:18 pm to
That’s not much value

A Sixers trade would include Matisse Thybulle probably
The Warriors could trade Deangelo Russell for RoCo and some picks
Lakers could include Kuzma
Then there’s other teams that are actively trying to get him but would have to work 3 team deals like the Rockets
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram