- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:13 pm to LSUTygerFan
quote:
don henley-glen frey
GREAT answer.
And serious. The Carpenters?????
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:14 pm to dukke v
Donald Fagen and Walter Becker were maestros
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:20 pm to Dandy Lion
I'd like to see the proper breakdown on the Lennon-McCartney thang.
Most were penned solo (probably ALL in the late years), and then slapped with the Lennon/McCartney tag.
One need only listen to know who the real author was.
two examples:
Come Together- yeah, a ton of McCartney in there
Helter Skelter- rife with Lennon input (not!)
Most were penned solo (probably ALL in the late years), and then slapped with the Lennon/McCartney tag.
One need only listen to know who the real author was.
two examples:
Come Together- yeah, a ton of McCartney in there
Helter Skelter- rife with Lennon input (not!)
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:21 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
Donald Fagen and Walter Becker were maestros
AGREED!!! AJA is a truly fine album.
"Do it again" is there best work IMO.
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:22 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
I'd like to see the proper breakdown on the Lennon-McCartney thang.
Most were penned solo (probably ALL in the late years), and then slapped with the Lennon/McCartney tag.
One need only listen to know who the real author was.
two examples:
Come Together- yeah, a ton of McCartney in there
Helter Skelter- rife with Lennon input (not!)
Well for the time in history they were at their peak there were NONE better.FACT.
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:26 pm to dukke v
quote:
Well for the time in history they were at their peak there were NONE better.FACT.
Correct.
As a kid, I thought McCartney was important. As a teen and later, I knew the Beatles were 90% Lennon, 5% Harrison, and you decide how Ringie and Paul carve up the remainder.
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:27 pm to Dandy Lion
Yesterday
Lennon-McCartney
all McCartney (and a great song)
Lennon-McCartney
all McCartney (and a great song)
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:29 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
Yesterday
Lennon-McCartney
all McCartney (and a great song)
Paul has written some great songs. But Lennon was much better IMO.
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:40 pm to dukke v
Let It Be
Oh, and 'Maybe I'm Amazed' wuz da shizen and came right out of the blue.
Oh, and 'Maybe I'm Amazed' wuz da shizen and came right out of the blue.
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:46 pm to Dandy Lion
Just had to put Maybe I'm Amazed on from el utubo, this comment cracked me up:
quote:
If you play Maybe I'm Amazed backward you will hear a really ripping recipe of lintel soup!!! True? story
Posted on 4/4/12 at 4:49 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
Oh, and 'Maybe I'm Amazed'
Wings over America was a great live album.
Posted on 4/4/12 at 5:00 pm to dukke v
quote:
Paul has written some great songs. But Lennon was much better IMO.
was always thought that Paul was jealous of John's lyrical skills and John was jealous of paul's melodious 'catchy' style
Posted on 4/4/12 at 5:04 pm to dexy82
I always thought the writing credits for john and Paul were roughly equal.
Posted on 4/4/12 at 5:05 pm to dexy82
quote:
was always thought that Paul was jealous of John's lyrical skills and John was jealous of paul's melodious 'catchy' style
There is a reason it is remembered as LENNON-Macartney
Posted on 4/4/12 at 5:08 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Loggins and Messina
Not bad but not near the best.
Posted on 4/4/12 at 5:08 pm to dexy82
I can't say that lennon was so much greater than Paul.
Paul never took himself quite as serious as John. John was always the dark brooding one. (not that George wasn't)
I just don't think you could have one without the other and have anyhting close to the success the Beatles had as a unit.
I also think there's a place in the world for light hearted music as well as deep thinking music. It's all about the mood your in, but it is interesting to think that people (or music afficianados) feel that only deep thought provoking songs have higher merit in regards to music status and abilities
that's just not true
Paul never took himself quite as serious as John. John was always the dark brooding one. (not that George wasn't)
I just don't think you could have one without the other and have anyhting close to the success the Beatles had as a unit.
I also think there's a place in the world for light hearted music as well as deep thinking music. It's all about the mood your in, but it is interesting to think that people (or music afficianados) feel that only deep thought provoking songs have higher merit in regards to music status and abilities
that's just not true
This post was edited on 4/4/12 at 5:09 pm
Popular
Back to top


0





