Started By
Message

Baby on famous album cover grows up and sues band for child pornography

Posted on 8/25/21 at 11:46 am
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
92440 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 11:46 am
“Defendants intentionally commercially marketed Spencer’s child pornography and leveraged the shocking nature of his image to promote themselves and their music at his expense,” the lawsuit reads.

The man whose baby photo is the iconic cover of the Nirvana “Nevermind” album is now suing the band, saying the image is child pornography.

Spencer Elden, the then 4-month-old pictured swimming naked underwater toward a dollar on a fishhook, filed the lawsuit on Tuesday arguing the image constitutes child pornography. Elden, now 30, further claims that he and his parents never had the ability to authorize the use of his image or his likeness and that he has suffered due to it.

“Defendants intentionally commercially marketed Spencer’s child pornography and leveraged the shocking nature of his image to promote themselves and their music at his expense,” the lawsuit reads. “Defendants used child pornography depicting Spencer as an essential element of a record promotion scheme commonly utilized in the music industry to get attention, wherein album covers posed children in a sexually provocative manner to gain notoriety, drive sales, and garner media attention, and critical reviews.”

The suit names the defendants as living band members Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic; original Nirvana drummer Chad Channing; executor of Kurt Cobain’s estate, Courtney Love; managers of Cobain’s estate, Guy Oseary and Heather Parry; Kirk Weddle, the photographer; Robert Fisher, the art director; and numerous record companies. LINK

Elden has “Nevermind” tattooed across his chest and has recreated the image on numerous album anniversaries. Though he has communicated mixed feelings regarding being the subject of the famous photo in a number of interviews, the lawsuit is the first time he ever referred to it as child pornography.

“The anniversary means something to me. It’s strange that I did this for five minutes when I was 4 months old and it became this really iconic image,” Elden told the New York Post in 2016, adding, “It’s cool but weird to be part of something so important that I don’t even remember.”


This post was edited on 8/25/21 at 11:47 am
Posted by Chappy
G-Town
Member since Jul 2007
3459 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 11:50 am to
arse clown
This post was edited on 8/25/21 at 11:51 am
Posted by LanierSpots
Gulf of America / Sarasota FL
Member since Sep 2010
71805 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Elden has “Nevermind” tattooed across his chest and has recreated the image on numerous album anniversaries. Though he has communicated mixed feelings regarding being the subject of the famous photo in a number of interviews, the lawsuit is the first time he ever referred to it as child pornography.

“The anniversary means something to me. It’s strange that I did this for five minutes when I was 4 months old and it became this really iconic image,” Elden told the New York Post in 2016, adding, “It’s cool but weird to be part of something so important that I don’t even remember.”



LOL. What a dumbass money seeking hypocrite.

The problem is, he will get money when he should be told to immediately kick rocks and frick off


Im really starting to hate everyone.
Posted by Hoodie
Donaldsonville, LA
Member since Dec 2019
3839 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 1:13 pm to
I was strongly considering Elden's case UNTIL I read about his tattoo. Dude should frick-off.
Posted by Treacherous Cretin
Columbus, OH
Member since Jan 2016
1503 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 2:24 pm to
Look out, Blind Faith.
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
26296 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 2:29 pm to
I'll take "deadbeat entitled loser who needs money for $1,000."
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10881 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 4:49 pm to
I'm sure this impacts his life negatively in a lot of ways. He probably gets recognized on the street all the time. "Hey, you're that baby from the Nirvana album!" Tough to deal with that kind of fame being forced upon you.
Posted by Treacherous Cretin
Columbus, OH
Member since Jan 2016
1503 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 5:00 pm to
Hey, you still have a tiny organ!
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7864 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

LOL. What a dumbass money seeking hypocrite.



I mean, is it not pretty fricking weird they put a naked baby on their album cover?
Posted by Stagliano
Member since Dec 2020
1661 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 6:23 pm to
quote:


I mean, is it not pretty fricking weird they put a naked baby on their album cover


This your first time hearing about artistry?
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7864 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

This your first time hearing about artistry?


Pictures of naked babies = artistry? No fricking thanks
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 8:59 pm to
Strange heel turn

Like he never got laid or tried to get laid by this fact alone.

frick him, hope he drowns
This post was edited on 8/25/21 at 9:00 pm
Posted by ReedRothchild
South MS
Member since Jul 2019
1692 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

Pictures of naked babies = artistry? No fricking thanks


It’s not something I would have chosen, but let’s not act like this is some kind of child pornography either. Naked baby pics have been socially accepted since the dawn of time. Ever seen a family scrapbook? There is usually a naked baby in there.
Posted by rtr1985
Member since Jul 2011
738 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 11:41 pm to
A naked baby shouldn't offend anyone. Unless you know, you've got issues. Porn is intended to provoke arousal - the baby on the cover of the Nevermind album is in no way provocative. Only people with a serious problem would view that as "pornographic". Do you find cherubs to be offensive? They are very artistically depicted - and widely accepted. Never heard them called pornographic.

And anyone with a user name based off Salad Fingers has no business critiquing art.
Posted by Treacherous Cretin
Columbus, OH
Member since Jan 2016
1503 posts
Posted on 8/26/21 at 12:36 am to
Does this mean I should get rid of my copy of Led Zeppelin’s Houses of the Holy?
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
14736 posts
Posted on 8/26/21 at 2:30 am to
If it's
quote:

Spencer’s child pornography
why'd he market it in the first place?

And why are we not putting him behind bars?
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
7221 posts
Posted on 8/26/21 at 6:00 am to
quote:

I mean, is it not pretty fricking weird they put a naked baby on their album cover?


Not as weird as the sadist youtube cartoon parked under your screen name.
Posted by Easye921
Mobile
Member since Jan 2013
3336 posts
Posted on 8/26/21 at 6:17 am to
This jackass literally did a recreation of the album cover a few years ago, as an adult. He's after money, plain and simple.
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7864 posts
Posted on 8/26/21 at 8:35 am to
quote:

A naked baby shouldn't offend anyone. Unless you know, you've got issues. Porn is intended to provoke arousal - the baby on the cover of the Nevermind album is in no way provocative. Only people with a serious problem would view that as "pornographic". Do you find cherubs to be offensive? They are very artistically depicted - and widely accepted. Never heard them called pornographic.

And anyone with a user name based off Salad Fingers has no business critiquing art.



Really strange the people from Alabama in the thread defending explicit pictures of children being used as “art”
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7864 posts
Posted on 8/26/21 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Ever seen a family scrapbook? There is usually a naked baby in there


How many people are in your family? How many people saw the “Nevermind” album cover?

I just think it’s really weird to use an explicit image of a child in a way that would be disseminated to the world to see, considering there are lots of pedo creeps who probably get off to shite like that. Is that really a hard concept to understand? Didn’t the sheriff of ascension parish just get arrested for feeding children cum filled muffins? People are sick as frick
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram