Started By
Message

What's the board's opinion of "The Kingdom of Heaven"?

Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:19 am
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
40958 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:19 am
The movie has started popping up on my YouTube feed lately. Caught this video and I think it's about time I watched it.

Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
26278 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:22 am to
I see memes of it on insta a lot. I've been meaning to watch it too
Posted by tigersgeauxballzdeep
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
33 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:26 am to
Directors cut is the only way to watch.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
22655 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:29 am to
I liked it a lot and have rewatched it several times. If you watch it, make sure you watch the director's cut, which is 40-50 minutes longer than the theatrical release. I've never seen the original release but I've read the director's cut is a much more complete film.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
72445 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:39 am to
A great film but very historically inaccurate.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
488023 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 7:40 am to
I left the theater saying "it seems like they cut a lot out of that movie and it feels like another movie is in there"

Then the director's cut was released, and it all made sense
Posted by tWildcat
Verona, KY
Member since Oct 2014
20309 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:22 am to
Love it
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
110322 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:27 am to
Gotta watch it as the Director’s Cut though. It feels thin without it.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
51152 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 8:28 am to
I remember seeing a few fans decked out in cosplay standing outside a theater when it came out.

It definitely has a following.
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
28411 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 10:26 am to
Director's Cut is fantastic

Very rewatchable for me
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
72445 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 10:29 am to
I don't understand the hate for my OP. It is a very historically inaccurate movie that goes out of its way to make Christians look terrible. Were there atrocities committed by Christians during the Crusades? Absolutely. But the way they portrayed some of the Christians in this movie - such as the Patriarch and Reynald of Chatillon - was straight up character assassination. The latter's death was so much more bad arse historically than how he went out in the film.

Saladin accused Reynald of many crimes (most of which were false) and demanded he convert to Islam or die. He refused to convert to Islam and so Saladin had him beheaded. Most of what we know of Reynald's life comes from hostile Arab sources from the period.
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 10:38 am
Posted by Cleathecat
Houston
Member since Feb 2021
2227 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:03 am to
My history could be off cause it's been years but wasn't Guy a good guy dude just an awful King?

Oh and fuk islam
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
71561 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:20 am to
I saw it and was underwhelmed given the hype
Posted by GoShoughYourself
Member since May 2026
584 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:23 am to
Long and boring AF

Definitely a movie only worth a single viewing at the most
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
18112 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:34 am to
quote:

I don't understand the hate for my OP. It is a very historically inaccurate movie that goes out of its way to make Christians look terrible.

The director's cut might be the last really good epic film, but you're correct.

I don't know if anyone listens to Julian Dorey's podcast, but he had on a guest recently to talk about the Knights Templar and the Crusades, and they briefly discussed Kingdom Of Heaven. The guest said he had only seen the theatrical cut, but was still able to point out the lack of historicity.

I mean, it's Ridley Scott. He's known for taking artistic license in his historical dramas, and then getting pissy and defensive when it gets called out.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
33170 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:47 am to
I think it's pretty epic.
Posted by Cleathecat
Houston
Member since Feb 2021
2227 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 12:05 pm to
I would totally murder Guy and be the new King if it meant sexy time with Eva Green. Anyone who wouldn't is a liar.........or a perfect knight.
Posted by Jebadeb
Member since Oct 2017
6076 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 12:58 pm to
Good movie, but I agree that artisic license is used to paint the muslims in a more favorable light, probably holywood response to anti-islamic sentiment after 9/11.

ETA:

From wiki

quote:

Jonathan Riley-Smith, quoted by The Daily Telegraph, described the film as "dangerous to Arab relations", calling the film "Osama bin Laden's version of history", which would "fuel the Islamic fundamentalists".[33]

John Harlow of The Times wrote that Christianity is portrayed in an unfavourable light and the value of Christian belief is diminished, especially in the portrayal of Patriarch Heraclius of Jerusalem.[34]
This post was edited on 11/12/26 at 1:02 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
72445 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

My history could be off cause it's been years but wasn't Guy a good guy dude just an awful King?



He definitely wasn't a good ruler but we have little to go on regarding his actual conduct as a human being. One thing we do know, however, is that he wasn't trying to start a holy war against Saladin as is portrayed in the film. He was trying to do the opposite in fact.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
72445 posts
Posted on 11/12/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Patriarch Heraclius of Jerusalem


He sure got boned by Ridley Scott's portrayal of him in Kingdom of Heaven. Firstly, it was Heraclius who convinced Balian to defend Jerusalem against Saladin's forces. Secondly, it was Heraclius who was able to convince those same defenders not to make a suicidal final charge that would have led to the deaths of not only Crusaders, but of countless women and children. Finally, Heraclius helped pay the ransom of as many Christians in Jerusalem as possible after the city's fall so as to save them from slavery.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram