- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is your opinion on movies inspired from video games?
Posted on 5/7/13 at 7:44 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 5/7/13 at 7:44 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I think the superhero bubble is about to burst
This was said after the success of The Dark Knight. I don't think they're going away any time soon. I never thought that Iron Man 3 would break box office records, especially given some of the fatigue caused by The Avengers and Downy Jr.
These movies aren't high art, some are just marginally wittier popcorn entertainment but they still attract more talent than a video game property does/will. It's simple - they have well-known, widely recognizable archetypes. Most stories in games have been told ad nauseum and it's usually the gameplay and interactivity that elevates it; I think that's a reason a solid filmmaker sees it futile to adapt a video game. The results of adapting a game along with its mechanics are clear, and studios see them as nothing more than a recognizable name that could be turned into a movie for a quick buck, i, e., Resident Evil. Universal killed Verbinski's BioShock adaptation because of the failure of Watchmen - a big budget piece of fiction that flopped at the box office. The very small community of studios still don't trust the medium as a real conduit for telling quality stories by respected filmmakers.
This post was edited on 5/7/13 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 5/7/13 at 7:49 pm to JombieZombie
quote:
This was said after the success of The Dark Knight.
Who said this? It had barely just started. Really the suoerhero phenomena started around 2004 or so, and most these fads only last for around a decade. I see a time soon when people get sick of the superheroes, just like everything else.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 7:57 pm to OMLandshark
It's been said before TDK, when the fad started. Mostly by snarky, pseudo intellectual snobs that look down at comics as a medium. I don't think many saw it as the phenomena that it is now and continues to be.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 8:03 pm to JombieZombie
quote:
It's been said before TDK, when the fad started. Mostly by snarky, pseudo intellectual snobs that look down at comics as a medium. I don't think many saw it as the phenomena that it is now and continues to be.
I like them, but I'll tell you what's going to kill the superhero films (with the possible exception of Batman): reboots. They'll continue to make trilogies, and they'll give us the same shite we've had before. People will get sick of it after a while and will know everything walking into it. The only superhero who I think can overcome this is Batman since I think they're going to take that franchise in the direction of the Bond movies.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 8:04 pm to JombieZombie
(Double Post)
This post was edited on 5/7/13 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 5/7/13 at 9:35 pm to OMLandshark
What is the point of giving everything a sequel, or even stretching movies out into trilogies.
I liked Thor, and I thought it worked well into setting up The Avengers. However, what is the point of making another Thor movie if they are going to also make another Avengers?
Furthermore, what was the point of making a third Iron Man? I know it ultimately comes down to making more money, but I just don't understand where it fits into the overall story of the world they built. Perhaps I'll have to watch the new Iron Man to understand, but for some reason I kind of doubt it.
I liked Thor, and I thought it worked well into setting up The Avengers. However, what is the point of making another Thor movie if they are going to also make another Avengers?
Furthermore, what was the point of making a third Iron Man? I know it ultimately comes down to making more money, but I just don't understand where it fits into the overall story of the world they built. Perhaps I'll have to watch the new Iron Man to understand, but for some reason I kind of doubt it.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 9:39 pm to Bmath
Spiderman, the Fantastic Four, Superman, Batman, Green Lantern, and Daredevil, they're already implementing their reboots. Once this Avengers franchise is done in say 7 years, expect it with them as well.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 9:55 pm to OMLandshark
quote:My prediction is that the superhero killer will actually be Avengers 2. Too many characters since they are adding a couple more. Its gonna cost a shitload to make. I just don't see it playing out well.
I'll tell you what's going to kill the superhero films (with the possible exception of Batman): reboots.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 9:59 pm to OMLandshark
I really don't understand the reboots of the very recent movies. They remade the hulk to add the cut scene about shield at the end, but then they had a third actor play Dr. Banner in the Avengers. Sure the second movie was better, but it seemed unnecessary. I honestly didn't think they really needed to try and make an obvious tie in.
The Tobey Maguire Spider Man, while a bit weak, still did really well at the box office. While I like the newest one, it just seems a bit silly to remake them so closely together.
On the other hand, I like what Nolan did with the Batman franchise. The Tim Burton movies were campy, and sort of played homage to the Adam West version. Nolan grounded the movie in something that felt real, and it brought a darkness to the they psyche of Bruce Wayne.
Once again, I know it is obviously about money, but I feel like they could ultimately play out these characters by bringing the movies back so quickly.
The Tobey Maguire Spider Man, while a bit weak, still did really well at the box office. While I like the newest one, it just seems a bit silly to remake them so closely together.
On the other hand, I like what Nolan did with the Batman franchise. The Tim Burton movies were campy, and sort of played homage to the Adam West version. Nolan grounded the movie in something that felt real, and it brought a darkness to the they psyche of Bruce Wayne.
Once again, I know it is obviously about money, but I feel like they could ultimately play out these characters by bringing the movies back so quickly.
Posted on 5/7/13 at 10:56 pm to Bmath
In terms of video game movies, the movie that has a chance to start the domino effect for studios (both game and movie) greenlighting the games that we most want to see made into movies is 2015's Warcraft directed by Sam Raimi.
Imagine for a second these films:
Metal Gear...directed by Christopher Nolan
Starcraft...directed by James Cameron
Assassin's Creed...directed by Gore Verbinski
Uncharted...directed by Joss Whedon
Diablo...directed by Peter Jackson
Mortal Kombat...directed by Kevin Tancharoen (this one is actually happening)
Mass Effect...directed by anyone but Michael Bay
Imagine for a second these films:
Metal Gear...directed by Christopher Nolan
Starcraft...directed by James Cameron
Assassin's Creed...directed by Gore Verbinski
Uncharted...directed by Joss Whedon
Diablo...directed by Peter Jackson
Mortal Kombat...directed by Kevin Tancharoen (this one is actually happening)
Mass Effect...directed by anyone but Michael Bay
Posted on 5/8/13 at 12:03 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
I think Halo could be made into great movies...as we saw of course in the Forward Unto Dawn episodes.
Watching this right now. It isn't terrible, but I wouldn't really call it a true Halo movie.
Posted on 5/8/13 at 12:07 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:Possibly, but MGS is the video gaming definition of jumping the MFing shark.
Metal Gear...directed by Christopher Nolan
quote:Unless it was done via animation, I don't see it working out too well.
Starcraft...directed by James Cameron
quote:That game was already pretty much a movie.
Uncharted...directed by Joss Whedon
quote:Same as Starcraft.
Diablo...directed by Peter Jackson
quote:I hope this one is more gritty than the original movies. The source info is really good.
Mortal Kombat...directed by Kevin Tancharoen (this one is actually happening)
quote:Maybe, but who would be willing to make a movie when you know the audience is going to want to lynch you at the end of the trilogy?
Mass Effect...directed by anyone but Michael Bay
Posted on 5/8/13 at 1:06 am to dawgdayafternoon
Mortal Kombat was great (for the genre). Thats about the only watchable video game based movie I can think of
This post was edited on 5/8/13 at 1:07 am
Posted on 5/8/13 at 1:12 am to Monsters and Men
quote:
There hasn't been a single good video game movie.
False. The first Mortal Kombat movie and Prince of Persia were both legit. Doom sucked as whole, but that scene where they went First Person Mode was awesome.
For me, the only games that have the story to become great movies are ones that are great themselves. However, if the story is great in the game, it's usually a long one and trying to condense it down to ~120 minutes with a bare bones story just doesn't seem worth it.
I wouldn't mind a God of War movie that filled in some of the blanks of Kratos's life, but it seems the studio is doing that via their games.
Posted on 5/8/13 at 6:39 am to Scruffy
quote:
I hope this one is more gritty than the original movies. The source info is really good.
Watch "rebirth" and "legacy" for Tancharoen's take on Mortal Kombat.
Posted on 5/10/13 at 2:16 am to CGSC Lobotomy
God of War if done by an Awesome Director could be great.
This post was edited on 5/10/13 at 2:19 am
Posted on 5/10/13 at 2:31 am to Soul Gleaux
wing commander
house of the dead
alone in the dark
silent hill
DOA
Hitman
max payne
upcoming
assassins creed
need for speed
warcraft
splinter cell
god of war
half life
devil may cry
resident evil 6
LINK go to the bottom of the linked page.
Sony Sets a Release Date for Resident Evil 6
Are you ready for another Resident Evil film? If you saw Resident Evil: Retribution - the fifth chapter in the series, which grossed $221 million worldwide - you know they've left the door open to at least one more chapter in the series.
When we spoke to director Paul W.S. Anderson prior to the start of Resident Evil: Afterlife (part four) he told us he had mapped out a story for a new trilogy which would carry the franchise into a sixth film, so you know he's ready. While we don't have a title for that sixth film, there is a confirmed release date...
ShockTillYouDrop.com has learned Sony/Screen Gems has set a debut date for September 12, 2014 which means Anderson and star Milla Jovovich will likely begin shooting the new film this fall.
Story-wise, no details have been released, but when we last saw Jovovich's Alice, she was at the White House and facing a rather large threat with Wesker by her side.
We'll have more details as they come in!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This post was edited on 5/10/13 at 2:45 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News