Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

WB to unceremoniously dump Eastwood's "Juror No. 2" with limited theaters, no marketing

Posted on 10/11/24 at 8:06 pm
Posted by Kinderman
Member since Oct 2023
1520 posts
Posted on 10/11/24 at 8:06 pm
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41049 posts
Posted on 10/11/24 at 8:23 pm to
Was it in opposition to the Message?
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
15140 posts
Posted on 10/11/24 at 8:28 pm to
His movie about the rooster was awful... Maybe this isn't much better
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104096 posts
Posted on 10/11/24 at 8:57 pm to
Zaitzev continuing to be penny wise pound foolish.

He killed, or tried to kill, Clint’s long term deal with WB because he hasn’t had a huge hit lately despite having a good track record with the studio creatively, box office wise, and consistently bringing in pictures on time and on budget.



I bet Lady Gaga’s wardrobe in Joker 2 cost as much as this one.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6131 posts
Posted on 10/11/24 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

What the frick are they doing?


Nothing, it looks like. Your tweet is the only source I can find with any mention of dumping and no marketing. Is the well-received trailer not marketing?

Every Google search result i see for this movie is stuff from past few days, profiles of cast and characters, a Clint Eastwood piece. In other words, marketing.

The film is closing the AFI fest (more exposure, a form of marketing), then opening in theaters a few days later, 11/1. Not having plans to expand from a limited release yet makes sense, because those plans are dictated by how much money the film makes in those limited theaters. This is called the platform strategy. They slow roll or expand quickly based on how the film is doing.

Feels like a pundit with Box Office in his name would know this. I wonder if he's using alarmist language to get more engagement...
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
37808 posts
Posted on 10/11/24 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

His movie about the rooster was awful... Maybe this isn't much better


He made Richard Jewell which is one of thread most underrated and important films of the last decade.



Should be required viewing
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
80399 posts
Posted on 10/11/24 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

Zaitzev continuing to be penny wise pound foolish.

He killed, or tried to kill, Clint’s long term deal with WB because he hasn’t had a huge hit lately despite having a good track record with the studio creatively, box office wise, and consistently bringing in pictures on time and on budget.

To be fair, getting out of business with someone in their mid 90s probably won't come back to bite you in the arse.
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
38455 posts
Posted on 10/11/24 at 10:23 pm to
It’s probably not good
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram