Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Tyson on Netflix - Oct 13th

Posted on 9/23/26 at 11:11 pm
Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
3658 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 11:11 pm
Posted by Ohana
Member since Aug 2026
227 posts
Posted on 9/23/26 at 11:17 pm to
Netflix documentaries have been below average. They care more about amount of content than good content.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
13700 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 3:00 am to
There isn’t anything they can cover that nobody doesn’t know at this point. It’s all regurgitated stories.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
35419 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 6:42 am to
How many damn Tyson docs there gonna be?

Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
74350 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 7:02 am to
Of course this is interesting but I’m starting to wonder if the fascination with Tyson at this point is because we never get straight or comprehensive answers to everything and whatever new doc we get on him is just another tease? There’s never been a definitive, all perspective and honest recounting of his life and career.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
157585 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 7:27 am to
quote:

There’s never been a definitive, all perspective and honest recounting of his life and career.

The Tyson (2008) doc was pretty damn good.

I am sure this one will offer nothing new about him, but I will likely watch just because that dude is so fricking fascinating.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
74350 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:10 am to
He is interesting I just hope before everyone is gone we get an all angles perspective on his career. The story always seems to change and is never seamlessly told like the careers of most athletes. I was a big Tyson fan in the early days and I’ve seen just about every piece of media on him and he’s unique in that his story is so disjointed, either because from his perspective it changes because his mindset changes so drastically or key people are left out. Most people of his stature have definitive stories on their careers but he doesn’t.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
22179 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 8:20 am to
Oh good, more blowing smoke up our asses about a rapist and career thug that was a good boxer.

...can't wait!
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43930 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:17 am to
Tyson is about the last person that needs another documentary about him.

The Undisputed Truth, Tyson, Tyson: The Knockout, and now this. There will be very little new information. I'll probably watch because I'm a Tyson fan but it will just be regurgitated info.

Great boxer, but easily the most overrated boxer of all time by casual fans.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
22179 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Great boxer, but easily the most overrated boxer of all time by casual fans.


I'm not claiming who was better, Ali or Tyson, but Ali is far and away the most overrated boxer of all time.

Not only isn't he "the greatest boxer of all time", but he's not even the greatest heavyweight of all time.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43930 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:58 am to
quote:

I'm not claiming who was better, Ali or Tyson, but Ali is far and away the most overrated boxer of all time.



Well that one is not even debatable. Ali is better than Tyson. By a lot.

quote:

Not only isn't he "the greatest boxer of all time", but he's not even the greatest heavyweight of all time.


Ali is arguably my all time favorite athlete. But there is certainly a case to be made for Joe Louis as the greatest heavyweight of all time. I won't deny that.

But the difference is both of those guys, Ali and Louis have a case for the greatest pound for pound of all time. Although Sugar Ray really takes that title.

Tyson is MAYBE, maybe, a top 10 heavyweight. I would probably have him around 10 but that's because I like him, he could easily be ranked outside of the top 10. Much less pound for pound across all boxer. He's probably top 75. But you have a loud, large, generation of men that watched 3 years of boxing ever and they will claim that Tyson is the greatest boxer/heavyweight of all time. Which is ludicrous.

You may think Ali is overrated, but he isn't even close to being as overrated as Tyson is. Alit is in the discussion for what most people rank him as, Tyson is not even in the discussion.

Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
22179 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Well that one is not even debatable. Ali is better than Tyson. By a lot.


If he's better, (and I probably agree with you), it's not by "a lot". Tyson was undersized and like Frazier would have had the same problems with him.

As cloddish and as uncoordinated as he is, a fighter like Usyk would have beaten Ali down.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
43930 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:34 am to
quote:

If he's better, (and I probably agree with you), it's not by "a lot". Tyson was undersized and like Frazier would have had the same problems with him.



By a lot or clearly better, however you want to put it. There is zero case to be made that Tyson is better than Ali. Ali fought 5x as hard of competition than Tyson did and every truly good fighter Tyson fought (which wasn't many), either beat him or gave him hell.

Most of Tyson's greatness is what if. He could have went down as an all timer but the fact is he had a relatively short career and didn't beat many great boxers.

quote:

As cloddish and as uncoordinated as he is, a fighter like Usyk would have beaten Ali down


Well, this is crazy Usyk is great and a hall of famer. But the guy has like 6 career heavyweight fights. He's been impressive in them but spent the majority of his career in a lower division. He's a better all time cruiserweight than he is heavyweight (cruiserweight/heavyweight weights have a factor in the discussion too). To say he would "beat down" Ali you'd have to say that simply because he beat Fury, Doubois, and Joshua. Three guys Ali would have destroyed. Usyk vs Holyfield would probably be the better match.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
22179 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:53 am to
Ali couldn't have have dealt with his size. ....however it would have been a boring fight. ...and Holyfield was obviously better than Tyson but also couldn't have contended with Usyk's size.

Regardless I'm in agreement with you that Tyson is a scumbag. ...but so was Ali.
Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
3658 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Tyson is a scumbag. ...


Mike Tyson may be the greatest living American.

Started at the very bottom. Went to the top. Went back to the bottom. Did his time. Ran the gauntlet and came out on the other side.

A short list of people that compete with the story of Tyson.

Listen to him every-time he goes on a long-form podcast and came to the conclusion he may well be one the wisest public figures in America.

Got the kind of wisdom you can only get from fricking up bad and having the perseverance to recover.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram