Started By
Message

re: The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story series long thread

Posted on 4/6/16 at 8:44 pm to
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
17551 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 8:44 pm to
I think the show still treated him like a footnote.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 8:47 pm to
Kim was on Oprah's "Where are they Now?" on the trial over the weekend. I don't think they like anything that gives "the murderer" any attention. Her father didn't appear on the show. In fact, I don't remember her talking much about her Dad now that I think about it.

Long interview with the Goldman's on the upcoming show. The quote below confirms a lot about Ito.

quote:

They found the cameras in the courtroom difficult to deal with - with Fred recalling one incident where a court official ordered him to move a packet of tissues from the railing in front of him because the judge said 'it didn't look good on camera'.


LINK
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 8:56 pm
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:03 pm to
I saw some click-bait title on some website saying you won't believe the "surprise twist-ending". Was it the Marcia Clark rape reveal? Also, next season should have been about Casey Anthony instead of Katrina.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 9:13 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

They found the cameras in the courtroom difficult to deal with - with Fred recalling one incident where a court official ordered him to move a packet of tissues from the railing in front of him because the judge said 'it didn't look good on camera'.


This tells you everything you need to know about Judge Ito, "frick you, your family, and your deceased kid. His murder trial isn't about him. This is about getting ratings in the television event of the decade."

How did Ito have the balls to go on to sit on for another 20 years in the court? He should have been disbarred and shunned.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 9:24 pm
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:28 pm to
quote:


This tells you everything you need to know about Judge Ito, "frick you, your family, and your deceased kid. His murder trial isn't about him. This is about getting ratings in the television event of the decade."


Dude, you need help. Ito was horrible and his wife too but come on with the family and deceased kid fricking...
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:35 pm to
You really need to get a grip. Lawyers/judges don't get disbarred for that kind of stuff. Geez.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Dude, you need help. Ito was horrible and his wife too but come on with the family and deceased kid fricking...


No, I stand by that statement. The trial was about the murder of Ron Goldman. Ito did not see it that way. He saw it as a media event to get himself famous and deliver the television event of the century. Grieving families and bringing justice to the victims was the last thing on Ito's mind.

If he tells them to remove tissues, then he's telling them that the cameras are more important than the families. So as a Judge, Ito may as well tell them all to go frick themselves. If your son was brutally murdered and the judge told you to move tissues to a better place to engage the audience at home, you'd perceive it the same way.

But do want to apologize for calling you an idiot last night. Had too much to drink and you've been mostly civil. I highly disagree with you, but at least yours is the only slightly other plausible theory, not to the point of reasonable doubt though when the evidence is all stacked up. But I'm sorry.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 9:41 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

really need to get a grip. Lawyers/judges don't get disbarred for that kind of stuff. Geez.



Ito put his own personal fame over delivering justice. If that's not bar for disbarring a judge, it should be. You can't deliver justice when you make it about yourself as a judge. That makes you totally unqualified to deliver justice.

Not to mention the fact that his wife lied about her association with Furhman in order for her husband to handle the case.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 9:47 pm
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:54 pm to
His wife lied. He didn't. He was a very poor judge. He did his job, but very badly though not to the level of required removal. I'd bet he got some "private advice" after the trial, though. Interestingly, so far, I'm not sure what the "fame" got for him other than a lot of criticism and ridicule.

I think your emotions about this case are so high and venomous that your are way more reactive than reasonable, sometimes.

Ito stunk, but he is not the reason this case went South. He was a part of it in some ways, but there were plenty of other factors and people contributing.

By the way, what's your theory on how OJ left the scene within the timeline without having a slew of blood in the Bronco and at Rockingham? There just wasn't near an amount anywhere around him which one would expect from a scene as bloody as this one was.
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:02 pm to
What did Nathan Lane get disbarred for? I watched the real trial on Esquire and that guy came off as a huge prick.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

His wife lied. He didn't.


I agree. I never accused him of making his wife lie about Furhman. I hope Ito would have had enough sense to stay away from the trial in case Furhman's connection to his wife was made public. I just think his wife didn't want to ruin his dream of judging the trial of the century and getting the fame he always wanted. I don't think there was any maliciousness in this part of the case.

quote:

Interestingly, so far, I'm not sure what the "fame" got for him other than a lot of criticism and ridicule.



I agree with this whole heartedly, and if I were Ryan Murphy, I would have a scene of Ito with his wife downing some shots after realizing what his pursuit of fame actually did to his life, how he ruined the trial by letting a murderer walk free, and (as a wink) how he ruined the media at large. He would realize he should have never taken the trial, let cameras in the court room, and then vow to live a more humble life.

quote:

I think your emotions about this case are so high and venomous that your are way more reactive than reasonable, sometimes.



...maybe

quote:

Ito stunk, but he is not the reason this case went South. He was a part of it in some ways, but there were plenty of other factors and people contributing.


Well, maybe not THE reason, but certainly the biggest. If Garcetti had had the trial in Santa Monica, OJ probably would have gone to jail. If Clark hadn't put Furhman on the stand, there's a good chance OJ would have been convicted. There are individual players that if they hadn't made one frick up, OJ probably would have gone to prison.

But no one fricked up more consistently than Ito. It was almost every day. He turned it into a kangaroo court and allowed the defense to escalate it to its highest possible level when he should have stopped them.

quote:

By the way, what's your theory on how OJ left the scene within the timeline without having a slew of blood in the Bronco and at Rockingham? There just wasn't near an amount anywhere around him which one would expect from a scene as bloody as this one was.


I'll look into the specifics a bit more later, but I don't think murdering someone is as dirty as Quentin Tarantino would have you to believe. They had plenty of time to bleed out, and OJ slit some throat and would have only gotten blood on his front. I think it's plausible it would only have a few drops in the Bronco while his front has blood on it.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 10:16 pm
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:13 pm to
F Lee Bailey got into some trouble while representing another client.

LINK

In spite of misappropriating funds, he blames it on the OJ trial.
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

The trial was about the murder of Ron Goldman. Ito did not see it that way. He saw it as a media event to get himself famous and deliver the television event of the century. Grieving families and bringing justice to the victims was the last thing on Ito's mind


This is all true.

quote:


If he tells them to remove tissues, then he's telling them that the cameras are more important than the families. So as a Judge, Ito may as well tell them all to go frick themselves. If your son was brutally murdered and the judge told you to move tissues to a better place to engage the audience at home, you'd perceive it the same way. 


I do perceive it the same way and I probably would have gone to jail for telling Ito to GFH on national TV.

All I'm saying is you are going too far saying eff his whole family and deceased child, etc...

Eff judge Ito, and his lying wife, ando whomever is in charge of judicial review/discipline in that state.

quote:


But do want to apologize for calling you an idiot last night. Had too much to drink and you've been mostly civil


Apology accepted, no worries.

This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 10:19 pm
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:17 pm to
The victms' families had to exercise a whole lot of control during that trial. A whole lot. Not sure how they did it, honestly.
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

The victms' families had to exercise a whole lot of control during that trial. A whole lot. Not sure how they did it, honestly.




And to be honest, there was a time that I wanted FG to stop crying on my TV, after reliving this and getting a little behind the scenes insight into it I feel like an arse. He can cry, cuss or scream his head off.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

All I'm saying is you are going too far saying eff his whole family and deceased child, etc...


It is a bit exaggerated, but the truth is there. It's clear Ito doesn't really care about the families and only cares about people watching and how they'll perceive it. He doesn't really give a shite, and as you agree, he's really telling the family that Ron's memory is not important in this and need to frick off. It is utterly deplorable to me that that thought would even cross Ito's mind. I don't even think the defense would have the balls to say anything close to that.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 10:26 pm
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:24 pm to
I like how they act like representing Eva Longoria is a big resume booster for Shapiro.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

It is utterly deplorable to me that that thought would even cross Ito's mind.


I agree. The last thing on my mind would have been how tissue looked to a camera.

quote:

I don't even think the defense would have the balls to say anything close to that.


The thought would never have crossed their minds. They had bigger fish to fry than to worry about tissue out of place. They were defending their client and these were smart lawyers. They were certainly concerned about their messages being delivered to the public by way of the trial, but not the look. Quick way to piss off a jury is to attack a victim or a victim's family especially when there's no reason to do so.

Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 10:13 pm to
OJ's daughter. Those are running back thighs alright.



Look how different everyone looks here.

This post was edited on 4/7/16 at 10:20 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 4/7/16 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

OJ's daughter. Those are running back thighs alright.



I honestly feel really bad for their kids. Could you imagine not only your father murdering your mother, but it being the most famous spousal murder in history? Those kids should have life long therapy for this, and they deserve our sympathy.
first pageprev pagePage 45 of 47Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram