- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story series long thread
Posted on 4/6/16 at 8:44 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 4/6/16 at 8:44 pm to OMLandshark
I think the show still treated him like a footnote.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 8:47 pm to Jorts R Us
Kim was on Oprah's "Where are they Now?" on the trial over the weekend. I don't think they like anything that gives "the murderer" any attention. Her father didn't appear on the show. In fact, I don't remember her talking much about her Dad now that I think about it.
Long interview with the Goldman's on the upcoming show. The quote below confirms a lot about Ito.
LINK
Long interview with the Goldman's on the upcoming show. The quote below confirms a lot about Ito.
quote:
They found the cameras in the courtroom difficult to deal with - with Fred recalling one incident where a court official ordered him to move a packet of tissues from the railing in front of him because the judge said 'it didn't look good on camera'.
LINK
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:03 pm to Gris Gris
I saw some click-bait title on some website saying you won't believe the "surprise twist-ending". Was it the Marcia Clark rape reveal? Also, next season should have been about Casey Anthony instead of Katrina.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:13 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
They found the cameras in the courtroom difficult to deal with - with Fred recalling one incident where a court official ordered him to move a packet of tissues from the railing in front of him because the judge said 'it didn't look good on camera'.
This tells you everything you need to know about Judge Ito, "frick you, your family, and your deceased kid. His murder trial isn't about him. This is about getting ratings in the television event of the decade."
How did Ito have the balls to go on to sit on for another 20 years in the court? He should have been disbarred and shunned.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 9:24 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:28 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
This tells you everything you need to know about Judge Ito, "frick you, your family, and your deceased kid. His murder trial isn't about him. This is about getting ratings in the television event of the decade."
Dude, you need help. Ito was horrible and his wife too but come on with the family and deceased kid fricking...
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:35 pm to OMLandshark
You really need to get a grip. Lawyers/judges don't get disbarred for that kind of stuff. Geez.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:39 pm to More&Les
quote:
Dude, you need help. Ito was horrible and his wife too but come on with the family and deceased kid fricking...
No, I stand by that statement. The trial was about the murder of Ron Goldman. Ito did not see it that way. He saw it as a media event to get himself famous and deliver the television event of the century. Grieving families and bringing justice to the victims was the last thing on Ito's mind.
If he tells them to remove tissues, then he's telling them that the cameras are more important than the families. So as a Judge, Ito may as well tell them all to go frick themselves. If your son was brutally murdered and the judge told you to move tissues to a better place to engage the audience at home, you'd perceive it the same way.
But do want to apologize for calling you an idiot last night. Had too much to drink and you've been mostly civil. I highly disagree with you, but at least yours is the only slightly other plausible theory, not to the point of reasonable doubt though when the evidence is all stacked up. But I'm sorry.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:46 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
really need to get a grip. Lawyers/judges don't get disbarred for that kind of stuff. Geez.
Ito put his own personal fame over delivering justice. If that's not bar for disbarring a judge, it should be. You can't deliver justice when you make it about yourself as a judge. That makes you totally unqualified to deliver justice.
Not to mention the fact that his wife lied about her association with Furhman in order for her husband to handle the case.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 9:47 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 9:54 pm to OMLandshark
His wife lied. He didn't. He was a very poor judge. He did his job, but very badly though not to the level of required removal. I'd bet he got some "private advice" after the trial, though. Interestingly, so far, I'm not sure what the "fame" got for him other than a lot of criticism and ridicule.
I think your emotions about this case are so high and venomous that your are way more reactive than reasonable, sometimes.
Ito stunk, but he is not the reason this case went South. He was a part of it in some ways, but there were plenty of other factors and people contributing.
By the way, what's your theory on how OJ left the scene within the timeline without having a slew of blood in the Bronco and at Rockingham? There just wasn't near an amount anywhere around him which one would expect from a scene as bloody as this one was.
I think your emotions about this case are so high and venomous that your are way more reactive than reasonable, sometimes.
Ito stunk, but he is not the reason this case went South. He was a part of it in some ways, but there were plenty of other factors and people contributing.
By the way, what's your theory on how OJ left the scene within the timeline without having a slew of blood in the Bronco and at Rockingham? There just wasn't near an amount anywhere around him which one would expect from a scene as bloody as this one was.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:02 pm to OMLandshark
What did Nathan Lane get disbarred for? I watched the real trial on Esquire and that guy came off as a huge prick.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:10 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
His wife lied. He didn't.
I agree. I never accused him of making his wife lie about Furhman. I hope Ito would have had enough sense to stay away from the trial in case Furhman's connection to his wife was made public. I just think his wife didn't want to ruin his dream of judging the trial of the century and getting the fame he always wanted. I don't think there was any maliciousness in this part of the case.
quote:
Interestingly, so far, I'm not sure what the "fame" got for him other than a lot of criticism and ridicule.
I agree with this whole heartedly, and if I were Ryan Murphy, I would have a scene of Ito with his wife downing some shots after realizing what his pursuit of fame actually did to his life, how he ruined the trial by letting a murderer walk free, and (as a wink) how he ruined the media at large. He would realize he should have never taken the trial, let cameras in the court room, and then vow to live a more humble life.
quote:
I think your emotions about this case are so high and venomous that your are way more reactive than reasonable, sometimes.
...maybe
quote:
Ito stunk, but he is not the reason this case went South. He was a part of it in some ways, but there were plenty of other factors and people contributing.
Well, maybe not THE reason, but certainly the biggest. If Garcetti had had the trial in Santa Monica, OJ probably would have gone to jail. If Clark hadn't put Furhman on the stand, there's a good chance OJ would have been convicted. There are individual players that if they hadn't made one frick up, OJ probably would have gone to prison.
But no one fricked up more consistently than Ito. It was almost every day. He turned it into a kangaroo court and allowed the defense to escalate it to its highest possible level when he should have stopped them.
quote:
By the way, what's your theory on how OJ left the scene within the timeline without having a slew of blood in the Bronco and at Rockingham? There just wasn't near an amount anywhere around him which one would expect from a scene as bloody as this one was.
I'll look into the specifics a bit more later, but I don't think murdering someone is as dirty as Quentin Tarantino would have you to believe. They had plenty of time to bleed out, and OJ slit some throat and would have only gotten blood on his front. I think it's plausible it would only have a few drops in the Bronco while his front has blood on it.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:13 pm to JabarkusRussell
F Lee Bailey got into some trouble while representing another client.
LINK
In spite of misappropriating funds, he blames it on the OJ trial.
LINK
In spite of misappropriating funds, he blames it on the OJ trial.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:14 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
The trial was about the murder of Ron Goldman. Ito did not see it that way. He saw it as a media event to get himself famous and deliver the television event of the century. Grieving families and bringing justice to the victims was the last thing on Ito's mind
This is all true.
quote:
If he tells them to remove tissues, then he's telling them that the cameras are more important than the families. So as a Judge, Ito may as well tell them all to go frick themselves. If your son was brutally murdered and the judge told you to move tissues to a better place to engage the audience at home, you'd perceive it the same way.
I do perceive it the same way and I probably would have gone to jail for telling Ito to GFH on national TV.
All I'm saying is you are going too far saying eff his whole family and deceased child, etc...
Eff judge Ito, and his lying wife, ando whomever is in charge of judicial review/discipline in that state.
quote:
But do want to apologize for calling you an idiot last night. Had too much to drink and you've been mostly civil
Apology accepted, no worries.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:17 pm to More&Les
The victms' families had to exercise a whole lot of control during that trial. A whole lot. Not sure how they did it, honestly.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:21 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
The victms' families had to exercise a whole lot of control during that trial. A whole lot. Not sure how they did it, honestly.
And to be honest, there was a time that I wanted FG to stop crying on my TV, after reliving this and getting a little behind the scenes insight into it I feel like an arse. He can cry, cuss or scream his head off.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:22 pm to More&Les
quote:
All I'm saying is you are going too far saying eff his whole family and deceased child, etc...
It is a bit exaggerated, but the truth is there. It's clear Ito doesn't really care about the families and only cares about people watching and how they'll perceive it. He doesn't really give a shite, and as you agree, he's really telling the family that Ron's memory is not important in this and need to frick off. It is utterly deplorable to me that that thought would even cross Ito's mind. I don't even think the defense would have the balls to say anything close to that.
This post was edited on 4/6/16 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:24 pm to OMLandshark
I like how they act like representing Eva Longoria is a big resume booster for Shapiro.
Posted on 4/6/16 at 10:37 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
It is utterly deplorable to me that that thought would even cross Ito's mind.
I agree. The last thing on my mind would have been how tissue looked to a camera.
quote:
I don't even think the defense would have the balls to say anything close to that.
The thought would never have crossed their minds. They had bigger fish to fry than to worry about tissue out of place. They were defending their client and these were smart lawyers. They were certainly concerned about their messages being delivered to the public by way of the trial, but not the look. Quick way to piss off a jury is to attack a victim or a victim's family especially when there's no reason to do so.
Posted on 4/7/16 at 10:13 pm to Gris Gris
OJ's daughter.
Those are running back thighs alright.
Look how different everyone looks here.

Look how different everyone looks here.

This post was edited on 4/7/16 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 4/7/16 at 10:20 pm to JabarkusRussell
quote:
OJ's daughter. Those are running back thighs alright.
I honestly feel really bad for their kids. Could you imagine not only your father murdering your mother, but it being the most famous spousal murder in history? Those kids should have life long therapy for this, and they deserve our sympathy.
Popular
Back to top


1



