- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Odyssey Trailer #2
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:03 am to molsusports
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:03 am to molsusports
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:40 am to molsusports
quote:
I think we might have gotten to the stage where Nolan is too full of his own bullshite to accept the criticism necessary to make this kind of complicated movie.
There's too many things wrong with the casting and language to bother discussing. An epic is meant to be epic, not sound like dialogue from Lassie. Say what you want about the flaws but Troy nails a lot of things Nolan appears to have whiffed on badly.
Correct.
And I have to stress, this has nothing to do with his casting choices.
His whole design of this movie (certainly won't be a film) seems bad/off.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:44 am to Proximo
quote:
Good explanation here
I get the kneejerk reaction people have that modernizing the language could lose some of the heart of the story, but the writer responsible for the adaptation went through grueling lengths to preserve the feel of the story.
Wilson faced an almost impossible task to keep the same number of verses as in Homer’s epic and transpose the Greek’s dactylic hexameters into the traditional (Shakespearian) iambic pentameter and succeeded.
Noone would go through all that effort without great respect for the original version.
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 7:46 am
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:58 am to Proximo
Using Gladiator wasn't a good choice. While a great movie, the production and characters were very "Hollywood". Also, it's much easier to do imperial Rome historically accurate.
Focusing on race is kind of stupid. Historical accuracy went out the window when they moved it from a Bronze Age conflict to armor/weapons of 400-500 years after the time period when the conflict in Troy likely happened. Accuracy went out the window when they chose steel. There's no rational reason to call for racial purity while ignoring that. The past was already "colonised" with steel.
The reason Gladiator succeeded and this movie will likely fail is because its overall design was done better. Now, this is much easier to accomplish with Imperial Rome, but Ridley Scott had a keen eye for the production as a whole. He was able to mix a very "Hollywood" story into a historical setting with minimal gravitas mixed in. To retcon Gladiator as some elevated act of poetry is completely dishonest. And it even had "race mixing" with one of the major side characters, which destroys the larger point attempted by that X post.
quote:
To impose that diversity retroactively is to colonize (and come on lefties...you HATE colonisation so...) the past with the present’s demographics. It is the aesthetic equivalent of making King Arthur Black or Cleopatra Korean: it can be done as fan-fiction or satire, but when presented as the definitive version, it treats the audience like children who cannot handle a story that doesn’t mirror a 2026 college campus.
Focusing on race is kind of stupid. Historical accuracy went out the window when they moved it from a Bronze Age conflict to armor/weapons of 400-500 years after the time period when the conflict in Troy likely happened. Accuracy went out the window when they chose steel. There's no rational reason to call for racial purity while ignoring that. The past was already "colonised" with steel.
The reason Gladiator succeeded and this movie will likely fail is because its overall design was done better. Now, this is much easier to accomplish with Imperial Rome, but Ridley Scott had a keen eye for the production as a whole. He was able to mix a very "Hollywood" story into a historical setting with minimal gravitas mixed in. To retcon Gladiator as some elevated act of poetry is completely dishonest. And it even had "race mixing" with one of the major side characters, which destroys the larger point attempted by that X post.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:11 am to SlowFlowPro
The emperor wasn’t black in Gladiator, it’s a good comparison.
Verisimilitude by Rob there, in one word, explains the entire problem
Verisimilitude by Rob there, in one word, explains the entire problem
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:41 am to Proximo
quote:
The emperor wasn’t black in Gladiator,
Menelaus, Agamemnon, Odysseus, etc. are white in this movie.
Again, The Odyssey threw out historical accuracy when it chose to use technology, arms, weapons, etc. from 400-ish years later. That's more important than the race of actors.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nolan appears to have whiffed on badly.
quote:
His whole design of this movie (certainly won't be a film) seems bad/off.
What day did yall watch it? I guess I missed the early release. I was only able to watch the 2 minute trailer, not the 3 hour run time.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:12 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
What day did yall watch it? I guess I missed the early release. I was only able to watch the 2 minute trailer, not the 3 hour run time.
Can't believe I'm about to defend SFP of all people, but here we are. Do the words "appears" and "seems" not register with you?
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:15 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Can't believe I'm about to defend SFP of all people, but here we are. Do the words "appears" and "seems" not register with you?
Seems and appears but somehow Nolan whiffed on ALL the things Ridley Scott nailed and the WHOLE design of this movie is off.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:18 am to iwyLSUiwy
Why wait for the movie to come out when we can jump to conclusions now? Haha that seems to be the mindset of the people that keep starting new threads about this movie.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:19 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Nolan whiffed on ALL the things Ridley Scott nailed
Wait what?
quote:
and the WHOLE design of this movie is off

This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 9:20 am
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:19 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Seems and appears but somehow Nolan whiffed on ALL the things Ridley Scott nailed and the WHOLE design of this movie is off.
You could have just said no, the words didn't register for you
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:23 am to LNCHBOX
The entire point of that post was missed, apparently. I'm not even the one who first brought up Gladiator, and I specifically said using Gladiator as a comparison (for the argument made by the X content creator, not my own) was bad. I even said Scott had an easier time being set in the time of Imperial Rome.
To read that post and come away with "Ridley Scott did everything right and Nolan did everything wrong" is just...weird.
To read that post and come away with "Ridley Scott did everything right and Nolan did everything wrong" is just...weird.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:23 am to LNCHBOX
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Top comment is spot on though:
quote:
an orchestra being where he draws the line in historical accuracy is funny haha
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 9:24 am
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:24 am to Kinderman
quote:
It’s not like the orchestra existed back then.
And steel did?
Every day it appears more that this is Nolan's white whale that he fricked up entirely by not having people tell him "no" or "that's retarded"
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 9:26 am
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Wait what?
That was a previous poster right before you.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:28 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You could have just said no, the words didn't register for you
Or, that maybe in like 5 different threads now and even in those particular comments, though someone says "seems like", they have already pre-judge the entire movie.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:28 am to Kinderman
He never mentioned anything about historical accuracy
He just said it didn't exist back then so it didn't matter
It is extremely clear that he is not giving us some straightforward historical telling like Troy was
This is substantially more of a fantasy story. Odysseus telling a story as an unreliable narrator
He just said it didn't exist back then so it didn't matter
It is extremely clear that he is not giving us some straightforward historical telling like Troy was
This is substantially more of a fantasy story. Odysseus telling a story as an unreliable narrator
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:28 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
That was a previous poster right before you.
Quote the post that says
"Nolan whiffed on ALL the things Ridley Scott nailed"
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:29 am to sgallo3
quote:
Why wait for the movie to come out when we can jump to conclusions now?
Popular
Back to top



2






