Started By
Message

re: The Cabin in the Woods. TulaneLSU's 2011-12 movie review thread

Posted on 1/4/12 at 5:09 pm to
Posted by BigAppleTiger
New York City
Member since Dec 2008
11046 posts
Posted on 1/4/12 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

Amen please ban this self righteous blowhard
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
49028 posts
Posted on 1/4/12 at 5:12 pm to
Your vocabulary, while reflective of intelligence, is rather heavy handed for a movie review
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 1/4/12 at 6:34 pm to
I now know how Evagrius was - but still have little clue about We Bought A Zoo.

More talky about movie.
Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 1/4/12 at 6:46 pm to
I'm 90% sure TulaneLSU has some form of autism. A light version, maybe something related to Asbergers, maybe something not yet quantifiable by science.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 1/5/12 at 4:41 am to
i appreciate this!

i disagree with bad teacher tho.

i thought it was worthy of a rating.
This post was edited on 1/5/12 at 5:06 am
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13638 posts
Posted on 1/5/12 at 4:43 pm to
I can never thank you enough for your recommendation of The Tree of Life.
Posted by iAmBatman
The Batcave
Member since Mar 2011
12382 posts
Posted on 1/5/12 at 4:47 pm to
dear baby jesus,

please make it stop...PLEASE
Posted by bddwolfpack
NYC
Member since Sep 2010
9407 posts
Posted on 1/6/12 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

iAmBatman


Nice thread on the Help Board. Tulane has spent a great amount of his time on this review thread of his, and it's been one of the most informative threads the Arts Board has ever seen.

Tulane
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13638 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:20 am to
War Horse I do not often write jeremiads, warning that this generation's wickedness is so great, surely God's wrath will fall upon it. I do not romanticize the past, saying that the morality of ages past is superior to the wanton ways of contemporary nations. Caliginous, Cimmerian perspectives of the present ignore the evils of the past. They assume that somehow people are different today from what their ancestors were. At the same time, I am not drunk with the possibilities of progress and revolution. As Weil said, "Religion is not the opiate of the masses. Revolution is the opiate of the masses." One aspect of human nature, or decreated nature, if you believe in the Christian view of a good creation, that it seems we just cannot shake is that of violence. There is nothing as inhumane as the violence perpetuated in war. One could argue that the WYHI threads are just as bad, but with such thought, there is the possibility of metanoia and redemption. The violence and death associated with war make that possibility impossible for so many who are killed too soon. The past is littered with human inhumanity to other humans in war. Cynically, I do not see much change possible, as we continue to find new and more efficient ways to kill others. To be human is to be at war. But to be human is also to be religious. Some will claim that the two -- religion and war -- are so inextricably linked to blame one on the other. I see it differently. That these two fundamental aspects of the human experience are at odds with each other, but because they are so much a part of the being of humans that they are confused. Religion, I believe, saves us from war.

To be of two natures at once, completely, this is what in Christianity has salvific power. Jesus is fully human and fully divine. It is in Jesus's divinity that we can be saved. It is in Jesus' humanity than we are saved, for as Gregory as Nazianzus wrote, "That which was not assumed is not healed; but that which is united to God is saved." Salvific incarnation has permeated philosophy and Western culture for two millennia that many of our most beloved figures in literature and, now, in film, are characters who have two natures, and use those two natures to show humans the greatness we have been given ["You have made him a little lower than God, And You crown him with glory and majesty" (Psalm 8)] and the pure workings of a creation that is set to follow the established beautiful laws of creation.

I suggest that War Horse uses its main character, a horse, to bridge the gap between humans and the creation. The horse, Jimmy or whatever his name was, opens a new realm to people by being one of them -- having the excellences we value: courage, love, purity, honor, devotion. But he does not discard his creaturely being. He does not try to make himself into a god. He does not build a Tower of Babel. He does not build a golden calf. He does not start war to increase his kingdom. He does not build weapons to kill for profit and power. It is his acceptance of his creaturely nature, something humans reject each time we go to war, as life is only God's to take, that makes him a Jesus-like figure. Being subject to the natural law placed on creation, none more important than to see ourselves as servants to a higher thing, i.e., the physical laws for animals, or a higher Being, i.e., God for humans, which in natural theology are essentially one, allows the horse to bridge the divide and to bring peace to warring sides. His atonement is not easily missed by the observant viewer. His blood drips from a crown of barbed wired thorns. His blood shows the nations that violence destroys and has no good use.

While I do not believe the writers intentionally made the horse a Messiah figure, he undoubtedly becomes one. And it works beautifully. In one of the best scenes of 2012, as the horse makes a mad dash away from the inhumanity of mechanical war only to be brought down by it, we see the power of sacrifice and of love. And we see later how humans have the capacity to rise above it, if we would just claim our God-given inheritance of love and treating others as our brothers and sisters instead of our enemies. The beginning is slow, and I was not impressed by the relationship the young boy has with the horse. It was uninteresting and boring. But the being of the horse itself redeems this movie and makes it good. 8/10
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:24 am to
You're review makes me feel like Tebowing.
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29897 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 11:19 am to
quote:

I had never seen The Muppets before this movie. I had heard of them, but only as a cultural reference. I knew there was a frog and a pig and some other things, quite uninteresting things, I must say.


Who the F has never seen the Muppets?!?

Why would I read a movie review by someone that is that out of the American cultural lexicon? Why am I still typing?
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 12:32 pm to
God hates your religious propaganda TulaneLSU. I will see you in Hell.
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13638 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:08 pm to
One should write his or her thoughts about a movie shortly after seeing that movie. These are my thoughts.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Why would I read a movie review by someone that is that out of the American cultural lexicon?


It's like learning about the backgrounds of serial killers or the Unabomber.
Posted by glaucon
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2008
5292 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 2:18 pm to
Your review of The Muppetts is really bad. Seriously, you completely missed the boat on that movie.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
97023 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

I'm 90% sure TulaneLSU has some form of autism. A light version, maybe something related to Asbergers, maybe something not yet quantifiable by science.


yeah i'd say thats very possible.
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 6:31 pm to
As "smart" as TulaneLSU thinks he is, I bet he couldn't pass English 1001. The first half of his review has NOTHING to do with the movie. I could BS a daily journal entry that is way better structured and pertinent than his "movie reviews" uh, I mean, his sermons.
This post was edited on 1/11/12 at 6:32 pm
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13638 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 9:47 pm to
The difference between people like you and me is that when you enter a forest and you see a rock, you see nothing more than the material rock. I see its composition and a poem, a flood of ideas of wonder.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

The difference between people like you and me is that when you enter a forest and you see a rock, you see nothing more than the material rock. I see its composition and a poem, a flood of ideas of wonder.



You are such a fricking douche.
Posted by Supravol22
Member since Jan 2011
14514 posts
Posted on 1/11/12 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

You are such a fricking douche
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram