- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Star Wars fans - anyone discussed the 4K projects?? they are SPECTACULAR
Posted on 8/6/24 at 1:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 8/6/24 at 1:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
slo: the despecialized project literally which was BY DEFINITION to update the 2006 release of SW DVDs is the same as the guys restoring the vintage 1977-83 films even though the 2006 release was completely different than the originals.
also slo: I WON THE THREAD
also slo: I WON THE THREAD
Posted on 8/6/24 at 1:36 pm to JoeHackett
I do see the difference in coloring, but is it really THAT different to warrant all this effort?
Posted on 8/6/24 at 1:40 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
but is it really THAT different to warrant all this effort?
I'm probably not upgrading from the bluray versions I have.
If there was ever an actual restoration from the real prints by ILM (or a comparable outfit), I may consider it, but Disney/Lucas will probably never let that happen.
Posted on 8/6/24 at 1:41 pm to BlacknGold
quote:its not just the colors; its removing the CGI crap Lucas added over the years, the Greedo-shot-first bullshite and essentially using only the source film from 1977 to make star wars...star wars again.
I do see the difference in coloring, but is it really THAT different to warrant all this effort?
if you read that link i posted, it will help make sense of things. for those of us who dont like shite like the rifles being erased from the police in ET and all the other meddling and want to truly enjoy the moment from our childhood in its most authentic form, then yes; it does warrant all that work.
Posted on 8/6/24 at 1:54 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
I do see the difference in coloring, but is it really THAT different to warrant all this effort?
It's already been said but it has more to do with taking out the stuff George Lucas added and stuff Disney has added.
(skip to 10:15 if the video doesn't start there)
Posted on 8/6/24 at 2:00 pm to JoeHackett
Yeah the Despecialized version takes out all that stuff and looks the best. That's why I really don't think I'm going to spend the money on a 4k upgrade that will likely looks worse. Now, if an official one gets released, like I said earlier, probably all in on that one.
Posted on 8/6/24 at 3:06 pm to CAD703X
I'm "ride or die" with Harmy until he says the 4K77/4k80 project is better (he has been complimentary).
It is a loyalty and appreciation thing, for me. However, I'm all for the 4k77/4k80 guys continuing work (they are also big fans of Harmy).
I consider the projects complimentary and not competitive. The alternatives that Lucas himself has tried to force on us are straight trash.
The closest to the original as we can get is best.
It is a loyalty and appreciation thing, for me. However, I'm all for the 4k77/4k80 guys continuing work (they are also big fans of Harmy).
I consider the projects complimentary and not competitive. The alternatives that Lucas himself has tried to force on us are straight trash.
The closest to the original as we can get is best.
This post was edited on 8/6/24 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 8/6/24 at 3:16 pm to CAD703X
The only drawback is that things that look smooth and shiny at the original resolution look rougher the higher the resolution.

Posted on 8/6/24 at 3:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's why I really don't think I'm going to spend the money
Posted on 8/6/24 at 4:35 pm to CAD703X
I own these on 4k already.
What am I missing?
What am I missing?
Posted on 8/6/24 at 6:31 pm to CAD703X
Slo is wrong and contrarian-for-the-sake-of-it many times.
But you are splitting imaginary hairs here.
But you are splitting imaginary hairs here.
Posted on 8/6/24 at 7:42 pm to JoeHackett
I can slap reshade onto a new AAA video game and make it look 50x better, crisper and sharper than what it normally does.
This doesnt look higher res. It looks reprinted with different filters.
This doesnt look higher res. It looks reprinted with different filters.
Posted on 8/6/24 at 9:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
I agree, I have the 720p despecialized that I think look better than the Lucasfilm released 4k versions available now.
I only watch the despecialized now, but I will download the new 70 mm 4k if I can find to sample.
I only watch the despecialized now, but I will download the new 70 mm 4k if I can find to sample.
Posted on 8/6/24 at 10:07 pm to BeepBopBoop
Daisy Ridley in not 4K


This post was edited on 8/6/24 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 8/7/24 at 10:16 am to Gusoline
quote:
I can slap reshade onto a new AAA video game and make it look 50x better, crisper and sharper than what it normally does.
This doesnt look higher res. It looks reprinted with different filters.
That is because they're restoring film prints for theaters and not the shooting negatives.
The point of the project in OP is to replicate the theater experience of the time, which will not be high res. No clue why you'd do a 4K of that, but, whatever.
This post was edited on 8/7/24 at 10:20 am
Posted on 8/7/24 at 12:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
What in the frick are you nerds talking about in this thread?
Posted on 8/7/24 at 2:55 pm to NolaLovingClemsonFan
Restoration of the 1977 Star wars theater experience
Posted on 8/7/24 at 2:56 pm to NolaLovingClemsonFan
quote:
What in the frick are you nerds talking about in this thread?
Palpatine's arse
Posted on 8/7/24 at 3:52 pm to dgnx6
quote:I have 4K77 downloaded, and it's phenomenally different than the commercial 4k discs or streams.
I own these on 4k already.
What am I missing?
Short answer: it is actual Star Wars as it was released in the theaters, at the bestest quality you could imagine. It blows the official stuff away.
Longer answer-
Star Wars was filmed (on film, not digitally). The originals suffered and some were lost, or got damaged, etc. Then there were digital conversions, that didn't get things right (bad color balance, etc). And then there were some efforts at upscaling, as well as Lucasfilm inserting stuff and otherwise altering the originals, and at times not handling color balance correctly either).
Star Wars was NOT Episode 5: A New Hope. It was Star Wars. That was the phenomenon that got everything started. It didn't have Han shooting at the same time, or even first, in the cantina; Han is the only one to shoot. It didn't have random digital critters obscuring the scenes in Mos Eisley... just like Jaws doesn't have a digital octopus onscreen. It JUST WASN'T THERE.
So fans with technical knowledge, skill and understanding have gathered together basically the complete movie(s), in 35mm slide format, frame by frame. They have painstakingly cleaned these slides to get the best possible image, then scanned them in at 4k resolution frame by frame, in the original aspect, taking time to get the best color palette and balance, so that people don't look pink or yellow at times (as you can see when you watch the commercial versions). They then did the audio soundtracks, including 5.1 Dolby from the laserdisc versions.
I had posted a thread awhile back... if you saw Star Wars as a kid, your mind knows. The font and color of the opening text crawl has been redone a bunch of times, but you will recognize "original" when you see it, if you had once seen it in that form.
The blue "A Long Time Ago In A Galaxy Far, Far Away"... it's right. It's what I saw in 1977. Tatooine is correct, Leia is correct, everything is correct. The aspect is correct, you get every bit of detail onscreen (it's not chopped to letterbox or anything like that).
it's just so much ... cleaner. Star Wars has been modified and converted so much, it's kinda like comparing a couple classic cars. One (the commercial version) has been waxed, but hadn't been detailed beforehand, so you can see all sorts of blemishes and stuff, sun fading, etc. The other has been completely restored to as-new condition.
Posted on 8/7/24 at 4:50 pm to Corinthians420
It moved. Like seriously, I zoomed in on that pic and my weiner actually moved.
Popular
Back to top



0








