Started By
Message

re: Star Trek Strange new Worlds Season 2

Posted on 7/3/23 at 9:04 am to
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36058 posts
Posted on 7/3/23 at 9:04 am to
Nice episode. Once again I was reminded of City on the Edge of Forever, but instead of having to allow a good person to die to secure the future, we had the opposite.

I was concerned that this Kirk was built without the raging libido of the original, but it kicked in during this episode. Only Kirk could turn a security clearance query into a future booty call.

BTW, this was an excellent lesson in not having your series lead available and turning lemons into lemonade. I was so caught up in Kirk and time travel and Romulans that I didn't see this as a filler episode until the show was completely over.
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
15005 posts
Posted on 7/3/23 at 10:04 am to
Captain Kirk has me almost feeling sorry for Khan. First he intercepts his vessel, eventually gets the better of him and exiles him to a doomed planet. Then a decade and a half later he tangles with him again and winds up killing him in a nebula. And now he's fricking his great great great granddaughter or niece or whatever she is.

Dayum, that's pretty hardcore dude
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30889 posts
Posted on 7/3/23 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

I was already sold on La’an (liked actress in limited appearances on Line of Duty, Dr Who, and some others before this show) and liked her in this episode up until the crying at the end. That crying face and the crying was kind of bad. I thought she was a better #1 than #1 and would be a better #1 full time on the show, but that crying makes think maybe it’s time for Spock.


I think they're trying to humanize her, and when you consider she never had anything close to a romantic partner due to all the things involved in her childhood and then her tenure at the academy, to get a fleeting moment of it only for the person to die in your arms?

As far as the acting of the crying, I guess I didn't see a problem with it? I've seen the way a lot of people have cried at things like funerals and the like - some people just look like that when they do.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30889 posts
Posted on 7/3/23 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

Last two episodes of the season have been a huge turnaround from the first, and gotten this show back as the best new ST property on years.


It's this, Season 3 of Picard, and Lower Decks is admittedly a guilty pleasure.

I didn't MIND Prodigy, I just accepted it as a show for kids (though a bit darker - so older kids, obviously).

I still say Discovery had some interesting ideas in those first two seasons and then failed on the delivery - but I think the higher-ups misread what was wrong and changed the IDEAS instead of changing the EXECUTION - that and the over emphasis on a single character. Even Classic Trek didn't focus on Kirk as much as that show focused on Burnham (and I think Saru was the best character on that version personally).
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7510 posts
Posted on 7/6/23 at 11:44 am to
Ep 4 dropped.

For those that know TOS well, you'll recall a flashback in "The Menagerie (Also know as The Cage) where the OG Capt. Pike experienced the time when he was engaged in mortal combat at Rigel 7. Here's that scene:

Pike @ Rigel 7

This episode has Pike revisiting this planet and the whole backstory of his first visit and why he's not thrilled to return.

Another good story. All of the cast gets some good screen time.
This post was edited on 7/6/23 at 12:45 pm
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
6445 posts
Posted on 7/6/23 at 8:24 pm to
Quality episode, if episode 4 doesn’t do it for you then I don’t know what will. It reminded me of the original, I don’t know if it’s going to have anything to do with the story arc of this season but I enjoyed it.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25869 posts
Posted on 7/7/23 at 5:51 pm to
It’s early in the season but I also would like to point out about those bitching on the first couple of pages about there not being enough Pike and SNW no longer being episodic were incorrect. At least so far.

Another solid episode.
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4578 posts
Posted on 7/13/23 at 9:19 am to
This weeks episode was great until the last two minutes. Absolutely great.

Maybe they’ll come up with some contrivance to explain it away :/ like he wasn’t completely healed.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7510 posts
Posted on 7/13/23 at 9:51 am to
quote:

This weeks episode was great until the last two minutes. Absolutely great.

Maybe they’ll come up with some contrivance to explain it away :/ like he wasn’t completely healed.



While this episode was very entertaining, they really went off the rails with the Canon. Let's get those out of the way:

If you remember "Amok Time" in TOS, Spock only saw T'Pring when she was a child before seeing her as an adult while serving under Kirk. In SNW, he's interacting with an adult T'pring 10 years or so before Kirk takes command.

Second is Spock's relationship with Chapel has no previous history aside from Chapel being a lovesick puppy chasing a man that doesn't have the same feelings.

The only way to clean that up someday is to have an event that retcon's Spock and Chapel..

With that said, the episode was fun and entertaining
This post was edited on 7/14/23 at 11:12 am
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4578 posts
Posted on 7/13/23 at 3:21 pm to
Thank you for better expressing my poorly worded point.

I can understand the slight retcon regarding T’Pring which was mainly a single episode in TOS, but the Chapel story and more importantly the character of Spock were pretty well set throughout.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36058 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 9:26 am to
quote:

If you remember "Amok Time" in TOS, Spock only saw T'Pring when she was a child before seeing her as an adult while serving under Kirk. In SNW, he's interacting with an adult T'pring 10 years are so before Kirk takes comma
From Amok Time:

KIRK: Marriage party? You said T'Pring was your wife.
SPOCK: By our parents' arrangement. A ceremony while we were but seven years of age. Less than a marriage but more than a betrothal. One touches the other in order to feel each other's thoughts. In this way our minds were locked together, so that at the proper time, we would both be drawn to Koon-ut-kal-if-fee.

• He says they were betrothed at seven. Did they ever say that hadn't seen each other since then?

quote:

Second is Spock's relationship with Chapel has no previous history aside from Chapel being a lovesick puppy chasing a man that doesn't have the same feelings.

The only way to clean that up someday is to have an event that retcon's Spock and Chapel..
As long as Spock and Chapel break up and decide to have an ongoing, strictly professional relationship, Chapel's pining for a Spock that was once human enough to care about her would make sense.

• Edited to add: The biggest "mistake" is the Enterprise crew not knowing who T'Pring is in Amok Time, after a few of them had her on board in SNW.
This post was edited on 7/14/23 at 9:54 am
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7510 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 11:16 am to
quote:

• He says they were betrothed at seven. Did they ever say that hadn't seen each other since then?

quote:
Second is Spock's relationship with Chapel has no previous history aside from Chapel being a lovesick puppy chasing a man that doesn't have the same feelings.

The only way to clean that up someday is to have an event that retcon's Spock and Chapel..
As long as Spock and Chapel break up and decide to have an ongoing, strictly professional relationship, Chapel's pining for a Spock that was once human enough to care about her would make sense.

• Edited to add: The biggest "mistake" is the Enterprise crew not knowing who T'Pring is in Amok Time, after a few of them had her on board in SNW.




I'm going to have to go back and check on T'pring. One other Easter Egg was dropped with Chapel. Did you notice the reference to Dr. Corby? Very clever. He was from the "What are little girls made of?" TOS Episode where Chapel mentioned she was once engaged to him and we discovered he was dead and replaced by an android body.


Update:

FK, I just went back to "Amok Time" and Spock didn't mention only seeing T'Pring as a child. We're led to believe that because we see Spock looking at her when she was a child and Spock talking about their betrothal at age 7 but that's it. Kind of like "Play it again Sam" was never spoken in Casablanca..
This post was edited on 7/14/23 at 12:05 pm
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9265 posts
Posted on 7/14/23 at 12:33 pm to
I’m okay with SNW just canning the original series canon and doing their own thing. I think they should use the original series as a guide, but not twist themselves into knots to have their timeline match exactly with TOS.

Nothing SNW does invalidates anything TOS did in any of its episodes or movies. TOS was the single most influential science fiction series of all time.

And precisely for that reason they should just tell everyone they are breaking free from it and doing something different. Because there will always be inevitable canon conflicts. If they don’t just announce that’s what they are doing, I expect it to happen story-wise soon enough.
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4578 posts
Posted on 7/16/23 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

FK, I just went back to "Amok Time" and Spock didn't mention only seeing T'Pring as a child. We're led to believe that because we see Spock looking at her when she was a child and Spock talking about their betrothal at age 7 but that's it.


I watched Amok Time today myself. I think you may be correct about the not saying he hadn’t seen her since 7. However, there was a scene on the bridge where she comes on screen and he is asked “who is that” and answers “my wife”. Uhura seems particularly surprised. Chapel is also on the bridge.


ETA

quote:

Despite appearing in both "Spock Amok" and "Charades," T'Pring and Uhura never meet each other. When Spock and T'Pring hilariously swap bodies in "Spock Amok," Uhura is on Starbase 1 helping Captain Pike and Admiral Robert April (Adrian Holmes) in their negotiations with the R'ongovians. In "Charades," Uhura goes with Nurse Christine Chapel (Jess Bush) and Lt. Erica Ortegas (Melissa Navia) on a shuttle mission to help Spock. In both episodes, Uhura is not even on the Enterprise at the same time as T'Pring, making the chances of them running into each other impossible.



LINK

This post was edited on 7/17/23 at 1:33 am
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4578 posts
Posted on 7/16/23 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

I’m okay with SNW just canning the original series canon and doing their own thing. I think they should use the original series as a guide, but not twist themselves into knots to have their timeline match exactly with TOS.


The problem with that is the entire point of “Strange New Worlds” is to serve as the prequel/origin story of TOS. It’s not simply another show set in the Star Trek universe, but it’s specifically tied to the characters and events.

quote:

And precisely for that reason they should just tell everyone they are breaking free from it and doing something different. Because there will always be inevitable canon conflicts. If they don’t just announce that’s what they are doing, I expect it to happen story-wise soon enough.


They have obviously done that with the Kelvin timeline and that’s fine. They made
it readily abundant to fans in the opening scene of that movie. It’s the correct way to do it if that what they want to do.

However, in this iteration of Star Trek, they made the decision to state they are in the prime timeline. As such, they need to respect the canon as much as possible. Taking advantage of some gray areas surrounding trivial details is fine. Completely changing an established character is not.

Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7510 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 6:40 am to
quote:

I watched Amok Time today myself. I think you may be correct about the not saying he hadn’t seen her since 7. However, there was a scene on the bridge where she comes on screen and he is asked “who is that” and answers “my wife”. Uhura seems particularly surprised. Chapel is also on the bridge.




This is where things go a little sideways. Based on SNW, Uhura and Chapel should not be surprised to see T'pring nor her status with Spock as was seen in "Time Amok" since in SWN they've seen adult T'pring a multiple occasions.
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4578 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

This is where things go a little sideways. Based on SNW, Uhura and Chapel should not be surprised to see T'pring nor her status with Spock as was seen in "Time Amok" since in SWN they've seen adult T'pring a multiple occasions.


I edited my post with a quote and a link regarding this issue. It stated that while Uhura was in the SNW episodes, they made sure to not include her in any scenes where she saw T’Pring and in fact had her off ship.

I’ll add in that whole rewatching a few TOS
episode over the weekend, I also happened to come across “This side of paradise”, where a spore-induced Spock hooks up with Jill Ireland. She mentions in the episode that she had loved him on Earth years before but he could not reciprocate. Obviously TOS does show that Chapel had a thing for Spock, but it also had her engaged to a scientist-turned-android in the episode What little girls are made of.
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
4578 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 12:47 am to
Episode 6 out. Sorta in line with one of the TOS “meh” episodes, though they through in a lot of fan service type stuff. The first “official” meetings for Kirk with “fleet captain” Pike, Spock and Uhura. Some Jim & Sam Kirk time….a little Kirk and Le-ann time….they actually went sly with those…and a brief update on the Spock-Chapel thing.

Despite the overall episode being, as I said what I’d consider a Tos throw-away style episode they seemed to put a lot of connections in.
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
6445 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 1:55 am to
quote:

The first “official” meetings for Kirk with “fleet captain” Pike, Spock and Uhura.


I’m not anywhere near being as knowledgeable as a few posters that post in these threads about the Star Trek universe, I just realized yesterday while watching the new episode that Uhura was from the original. I liked the episode but I can understand if a lot of people don’t care for it. With only 4 episodes left this season things should definitely pick up over the next month. I have a few questions about Pike and Spock’s love interests but I don’t want to spoil it for myself.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7510 posts
Posted on 7/21/23 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Episode 6 out. Sorta in line with one of the TOS “meh” episodes, though they through in a lot of fan service type stuff. The first “official” meetings for Kirk with “fleet captain” Pike, Spock and Uhura. Some Jim & Sam Kirk time….a little Kirk and Le-ann time….they actually went sly with those…and a brief update on the Spock-Chapel thing.

Despite the overall episode being, as I said what I’d consider a Tos throw-away style episode they seemed to put a lot of connections in.



Agreed. This was certainly the weakest episode of season 2. While it was still entertaining, it suffered from a weak script that could have been elevated better.

One thing I did really like in this episode was establishing a little back story of the Kirk brothers. I was please they retconned the prer-mature death of their father George Kirk by establishing he lived past the Kelvin and was part of their upbringing

Here are a few of my "pedantic thoughts":

1. Using TNG's Ten Forward as a template for a social bar/club, the one on SNW's Enterprise is too big and glitzy for a smaller ship from nearly 100 earlier than the Enterprise-D

2. The Federation must have money to burn. Blowing up that array with no physical evidence and just the word of an ensign fresh out of the Academy was a stretch. This is bad writing. The Science Team or the Medical staff should have established physical proof with Uhura's help.

3. Why do writers continually want to put Spock in a relationship? The JJ Trek tragedies had him hooking up with Uhura and SNW has him in a relationship Chapel.

The TOS Spock was the pure scientist. He was the rationale side of Kirk that created a great balance. I don't like these over-emotional Spock's that we're getting.

Next episode is going to be a crossover with "Lower Decks". 2 Live versions of those animated characters will be visiting the Enterprise.





This post was edited on 7/21/23 at 4:34 pm
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram