- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Star Trek: Discovery
Posted on 4/4/20 at 7:49 am
Posted on 4/4/20 at 7:49 am
I am a lifelong Trekker, but never subscribed to CBS All-Access because I suspected that this show would be sub-standard.
Thanks to Covid-19 and the free month, I took the plunge and invested some time watching Discovery’s first season.
Does ANYONE like this shitshow?
Will this crapfest be treated as Star Trek canon?
Is Picard as bad as Discovery?
Thanks to Covid-19 and the free month, I took the plunge and invested some time watching Discovery’s first season.
Does ANYONE like this shitshow?
Will this crapfest be treated as Star Trek canon?
Is Picard as bad as Discovery?
Posted on 4/4/20 at 7:56 am to AggieHank86
I thought Discovery was fantastic.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 8:22 am to TigerLunatik
Discovery is a pile of rotting horseshite.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 8:47 am to Athos
Star Trek
Deep Space 9
Enterprise very underrated
Voyager
Next Generation
Discovery the worst ever and never should have made it to the screen.
Have not seen Picard yet.
Deep Space 9
Enterprise very underrated
Voyager
Next Generation
Discovery the worst ever and never should have made it to the screen.
Have not seen Picard yet.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 8:54 am to Athos
Discovery looks like something out of the Abramsverse, rather than real Star Trek.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 9:05 am to AggieHank86
JJ Trek was passably good and Justin Lin made a fun last film.
Discovery takes all the dumb JJ shite, though, but ramps it up by a million. I’ve only seen clips and watched The Critical Drinker hammer this show... but that was enough to figure out Michael is the worst fricking Trek character in history.
Discovery takes all the dumb JJ shite, though, but ramps it up by a million. I’ve only seen clips and watched The Critical Drinker hammer this show... but that was enough to figure out Michael is the worst fricking Trek character in history.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 9:14 am to AggieHank86
It's pretty good.
Def better than Picard
Def better than Picard
Posted on 4/4/20 at 9:22 am to AggieHank86
The only real problem with Discovery's first season is that it's story-telling is vastly different than previous Trek series.
In previous series you had the Captain as the main character but the supporting crew and their stories were maybe a half-step behind in importance. While Trek took on social issues, it did so at a very high level without brutally and blatantly beating the viewer over the head with SJW-ism.
Discovery departs from that mold. Instead we have the main character not being the Captain but rather being a subordinate and outsider while having a supporting cast of characters who rank both above and below her whom the viewer feels little to no connection with. No one watches Star Trek for a sense of isolation. Not only that but it seems like she cries in almost every fricking episode.
The stories of the supporting characters aren't all that endearing either and the series gets waaaaaaay too far into their personal lives and emotional issues far too quickly. I could do without Tilly's constant blathering as well as the ship's doctor's gay relationship. No one watches Star Trek for the romance nor love issues, whether gay or straight, so leave that shite out (or at least just touch on it briefly and then move on).
With all that said, Discovery's first season is a great Trek story but it was told in a non-Trek way. It's a little slow in the beginning but by about mid-season it really starts cooking and has some great swerves. By the end of the first season you realize why at least some of the story-telling was done the way it was but not all of it.
I didn't care for the 2nd season, primarily because of relying on TOS characters too much. How they ended it though with why Discovery (and it's incredibly drive tech) has never been heard of was a smart turn. I did, however, prefer the old lesbian engineer chick to the guy. While a bit flat on personality her IDGAF-ness is a MUCH-needed counter-balance to the over-emotionality of damned near every other character.
As to Picard...
As someone said in another thread, Picard should be renamed to Picardians of the Galaxy because it felt far more like that than a Star Trek series. The biggest issue here is that they are taking Rodenberry's bright, shiny, hopeful and optimistic Starfleet and turning it into a fricking Jason Bourne story.
This Bourne-ing could also be said of Discovery but I see that as a lesser issue due to it being a prequel series during the re-ignition of Federation/Klingon animosities and because they could be using that as a platform to "clean up" Starfleet by the time the TOS was supposed to start. Granted, it's probably not going to go that way but in the theme of Rodenberry I am being optimistic about the future.
Don't get me wrong, a darker tone isn't always bad. I actually liked the darker tone of DS9 and the darker tone of the Changelings infiltrating Starfleet storyline, but the Changelings were a finite story where Starfleet was still good but just naive. Where we're at now is with Starfleet being far more grey and that ultimately conflicts with the vision Rodenberry had of a future where humanity had learned its lessons and was well above what we saw in Picard (and this doesn't even begin to get into the whole complete about-face that had to happen within the Federation to get them to that point).
In previous series you had the Captain as the main character but the supporting crew and their stories were maybe a half-step behind in importance. While Trek took on social issues, it did so at a very high level without brutally and blatantly beating the viewer over the head with SJW-ism.
Discovery departs from that mold. Instead we have the main character not being the Captain but rather being a subordinate and outsider while having a supporting cast of characters who rank both above and below her whom the viewer feels little to no connection with. No one watches Star Trek for a sense of isolation. Not only that but it seems like she cries in almost every fricking episode.
The stories of the supporting characters aren't all that endearing either and the series gets waaaaaaay too far into their personal lives and emotional issues far too quickly. I could do without Tilly's constant blathering as well as the ship's doctor's gay relationship. No one watches Star Trek for the romance nor love issues, whether gay or straight, so leave that shite out (or at least just touch on it briefly and then move on).
With all that said, Discovery's first season is a great Trek story but it was told in a non-Trek way. It's a little slow in the beginning but by about mid-season it really starts cooking and has some great swerves. By the end of the first season you realize why at least some of the story-telling was done the way it was but not all of it.
I didn't care for the 2nd season, primarily because of relying on TOS characters too much. How they ended it though with why Discovery (and it's incredibly drive tech) has never been heard of was a smart turn. I did, however, prefer the old lesbian engineer chick to the guy. While a bit flat on personality her IDGAF-ness is a MUCH-needed counter-balance to the over-emotionality of damned near every other character.
As to Picard...
As someone said in another thread, Picard should be renamed to Picardians of the Galaxy because it felt far more like that than a Star Trek series. The biggest issue here is that they are taking Rodenberry's bright, shiny, hopeful and optimistic Starfleet and turning it into a fricking Jason Bourne story.
This Bourne-ing could also be said of Discovery but I see that as a lesser issue due to it being a prequel series during the re-ignition of Federation/Klingon animosities and because they could be using that as a platform to "clean up" Starfleet by the time the TOS was supposed to start. Granted, it's probably not going to go that way but in the theme of Rodenberry I am being optimistic about the future.
Don't get me wrong, a darker tone isn't always bad. I actually liked the darker tone of DS9 and the darker tone of the Changelings infiltrating Starfleet storyline, but the Changelings were a finite story where Starfleet was still good but just naive. Where we're at now is with Starfleet being far more grey and that ultimately conflicts with the vision Rodenberry had of a future where humanity had learned its lessons and was well above what we saw in Picard (and this doesn't even begin to get into the whole complete about-face that had to happen within the Federation to get them to that point).
This post was edited on 4/4/20 at 9:49 am
Posted on 4/4/20 at 9:42 am to AggieHank86
Discovery is awesome. To this point, it's probably the 2nd best series behind TNG
Posted on 4/4/20 at 12:56 pm to BowlJackson
No way is Discovery better than DS9
Posted on 4/4/20 at 1:16 pm to AggieHank86
You should do yourself a favor and check out RLM's treatment of Discovery and Picard.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 1:30 pm to sportsaddit68
quote:
No way is Discovery better than DS9
Yeah, I enjoy Discovery quite a bit, but it is not even close to DS9.
The first season of Discovery takes a little bit to get going but is a really good storyline. How they fixed the historical/timeline issues in the second season was well done as well.
I can see hardcore Star Trek fans not liking it though, as it's more like the reboot trek than the old stuff. It's at least a solid series taken on it's own though.
Picard is just straight garbage, I stopped watching that after 5 episodes.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 1:35 pm to Bard
When to establish Lorca as the bad guy they had him say “make the empire great again” I had enough. That’s just lazy, hammy writing.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 1:58 pm to AggieHank86
I like anything Star Trek. Not the best series but I enjoyed it and would watch it again.
Production is top notch
Production is top notch
Posted on 4/4/20 at 2:06 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Is Picard as bad as Discovery?
No.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 2:30 pm to AggieHank86
Discovery is supposed to be very good. It’s all I’ve ever heard from those who watched it, and only a couple were trekkies.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 2:38 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
quote:
RLM's treatment
???
Red
Letter
Media
Posted on 4/4/20 at 2:44 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Does ANYONE like this shitshow?
quote:
Is Picard as bad as Discovery?
If that's your reaction to Discovery, you should stop now and avoid anything else Star Trek on CBS All Access.
Posted on 4/4/20 at 3:12 pm to udtiger
quote:TYVM
Red
Letter
Media
Edit:
RLM seems to hate this Abramsesque treatment even more than I.
This post was edited on 4/4/20 at 3:18 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News